Assessing the effect of closed-loop insulin delivery from onset of type 1 diabetes in youth on residual beta-cell function compared to standard insulin therapy (CLOuD study): a randomised parallel study protocol

Charlotte Boughton, Janet M Allen, Martin Tauschmann, Sara Hartnell, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Gianluca Musolino, Carlo L Acerini, Professor David Dunger, Fiona Campbell, Atrayee Ghatak, Tabitha Randell, Rachel Besser, Nicola Trevelyan, Daniela Elleri, Elizabeth Northam, Korey Hood, Eleanor Scott, Julia Lawton, Stephane Roze, Judy Sibayan, Craig Kollman, Nate Cohen, John Todd, Roman Hovorka, CLOuD Consortium, Charlotte Boughton, Janet M Allen, Martin Tauschmann, Sara Hartnell, Malgorzata E Wilinska, Gianluca Musolino, Carlo L Acerini, Professor David Dunger, Fiona Campbell, Atrayee Ghatak, Tabitha Randell, Rachel Besser, Nicola Trevelyan, Daniela Elleri, Elizabeth Northam, Korey Hood, Eleanor Scott, Julia Lawton, Stephane Roze, Judy Sibayan, Craig Kollman, Nate Cohen, John Todd, Roman Hovorka, CLOuD Consortium

Abstract

Introduction: Management of newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes (T1D) in children and adolescents is challenging for patients, families and healthcare professionals. The objective of this study is to determine whether continued intensive metabolic control using hybrid closed-loop (CL) insulin delivery following diagnosis of T1D can preserve C-peptide secretion, a marker of residual beta-cell function, compared with standard multiple daily injections (MDI) therapy.

Methods and analysis: The study adopts an open-label, multicentre, randomised, parallel design, and aims to randomise 96 participants aged 10-16.9 years, recruited within 21 days of diagnosis with T1D. Following a baseline mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT), participants will be randomised to receive 24 months treatment with conventional MDI therapy or with CL insulin delivery. A further 24-month optional extension phase will be offered to all participants to continue with the allocated treatment. The primary outcome is the between group difference in area under the stimulated C-peptide curve (AUC) of the MMTT at 12 months post diagnosis. Analyses will be conducted on an intention-to-treat basis. Key secondary outcomes are between group differences in time spent in target glucose range (3.9-10 mmol/L), glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and time spent in hypoglycaemia (<3.9 mmol/L) at 12 months. Secondary efficacy outcomes include between group differences in stimulated C-peptide AUC at 24 months, time spent in target glucose range, glucose variability, hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia as recorded by periodically applied masked continuous glucose monitoring devices, total, basal and bolus insulin dose, and change in body weight. Cognitive, emotional and behavioural characteristics of participants and parents will be evaluated, and a cost-utility analysis performed to support adoption of CL as a standard treatment modality following diagnosis of T1D.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethics approval has been obtained from Cambridge East Research Ethics Committee. The results will be disseminated by peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

Trial registration number: NCT02871089; Pre-results.

Keywords: artificial pancreas; closed-loop; type 1 diabetes.

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: RH reports having received speaker honoraria from Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, serving on advisory panel for Eli Lilly and Novo Nordisk, receiving licence fees from BBraun and Medtronic. RH and MEW report patient patents and patent applications. MT has received speaker honoraria from Medtronic and Novo Nordisk. SH is a member of Sigma (Dexcom) advisory board and reports having received training honoraria from Medtronic and Sanofi. TLR has received speaker honoraria from Novo Nordisk and serves as a consultant for Abbott Diabetes Care. KH has received research support from Dexcom, Inc for an investigator-initiated project; he has received consultant fees from Lilly Innovation Center, Bigfoot Biomedical, and Insulet, Inc.

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow including extension phase. CGM, continuous glucose monitoring; HbA1c, glycated haemoglobin; MDI, multiple daily injection; MMTT, mixed meal tolerance test

References

    1. Atkinson MA, Eisenbarth GS, Michels AW. Type 1 diabetes. Lancet 2014;383:69–82. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60591-7
    1. The Feel4 Diabetes International diabetes Federation diabetes atlas. 8th edn Brussels, Belgium, 2017.
    1. Wood JR, Miller KM, Maahs DM, et al. . Most youth with type 1 diabetes in the T1D exchange clinic registry do not meet American diabetes association or International Society for pediatric and adolescent diabetes clinical guidelines. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2035–7. 10.2337/dc12-1959
    1. Johnson SR, Cooper MN, Davis EA, et al. . Hypoglycaemia, fear of hypoglycaemia and quality of life in children with type 1 diabetes and their parents. Diabet Med 2013;30:1126–31. 10.1111/dme.12247
    1. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group Effect of intensive therapy on residual beta-cell function in patients with type 1 diabetes in the diabetes control and complications trial. A randomized, controlled trial. The diabetes control and complications trial Research Group. Ann Intern Med 1998;128:517–23. 10.7326/0003-4819-128-7-199804010-00001
    1. Steffes MW, Sibley S, Jackson M, et al. . Beta-Cell function and the development of diabetes-related complications in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes Care 2003;26:832–6. 10.2337/diacare.26.3.832
    1. Lachin JM, McGee P, Palmer JP, et al. . Impact of C-peptide preservation on metabolic and clinical outcomes in the diabetes control and complications trial. Diabetes 2014;63:739–48. 10.2337/db13-0881
    1. Phillip M, Danne T, Shalitin S, et al. . Use of continuous glucose monitoring in children and adolescents (*). Pediatr Diabetes 2012;13:215–28. 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00849.x
    1. Kordonouri O, Pankowska E, Rami B, et al. . Sensor-Augmented pump therapy from the diagnosis of childhood type 1 diabetes: results of the paediatric onset study (onset) after 12 months of treatment. Diabetologia 2010;53:2487–95. 10.1007/s00125-010-1878-6
    1. Bergenstal RM, Klonoff DC, Garg SK, et al. . Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia. N Engl J Med 2013;369:224–32. 10.1056/NEJMoa1303576
    1. Ly TT, Nicholas JA, Retterath A, et al. . Effect of sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy and automated insulin suspension vs standard insulin pump therapy on hypoglycemia in patients with type 1 diabetes: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2013;310:1240–7. 10.1001/jama.2013.277818
    1. Bekiari E, Kitsios K, Thabit H, et al. . Artificial pancreas treatment for outpatients with type 1 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2018;361:k1310 10.1136/bmj.k1310
    1. Hovorka R, Allen JM, Elleri D, et al. . Manual closed-loop insulin delivery in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a phase 2 randomised crossover trial. Lancet 2010;375:743–51. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)61998-X
    1. Elleri D, Allen JM, Kumareswaran K, et al. . Closed-Loop basal insulin delivery over 36 hours in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2013;36:838–44. 10.2337/dc12-0816
    1. Nimri R, Danne T, Kordonouri O, et al. . The "Glucositter" overnight automated closed loop system for type 1 diabetes: a randomized crossover trial. Pediatr Diabetes 2013;14:159–67. 10.1111/pedi.12025
    1. Hovorka R, Elleri D, Thabit H, et al. . Overnight closed-loop insulin delivery in young people with type 1 diabetes: a free-living, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2014;37:1204–11. 10.2337/dc13-2644
    1. Thabit H, Tauschmann M, Allen JM, et al. . Home use of an artificial beta cell in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2129–40. 10.1056/NEJMoa1509351
    1. Nimri R, Muller I, Atlas E, et al. . Night glucose control with MD-Logic artificial pancreas in home setting: a single blind, randomized crossover trial-interim analysis. Pediatr Diabetes 2014;15:91–9. 10.1111/pedi.12071
    1. Tauschmann M, Allen JM, Wilinska ME, et al. . Day-and-Night hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: a free-living, randomized clinical trial. Diabetes Care 2016;39:1168–74. 10.2337/dc15-2078
    1. Tauschmann M, Thabit H, Bally L, et al. . Closed-Loop insulin delivery in suboptimally controlled type 1 diabetes: a multicentre, 12-week randomised trial. Lancet 2018;392:1321–9. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31947-0
    1. Barnard KD, Wysocki T, Allen JM, et al. . Closing the loop overnight at home setting: psychosocial impact for adolescents with type 1 diabetes and their parents. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2014;2:e000025 10.1136/bmjdrc-2014-000025
    1. Lange K, Swift P, Pańkowska E, et al. . ISPAD clinical practice consensus guidelines 2014. diabetes education in children and adolescents. Pediatr Diabetes 2014;15 Suppl 20:77–85. 10.1111/pedi.12187
    1. Maruff P, Thomas E, Cysique L, et al. . Validity of the CogState brief battery: relationship to standardized tests and sensitivity to cognitive impairment in mild traumatic brain injury, schizophrenia, and AIDS dementia complex. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2009;24:165–78. 10.1093/arclin/acp010
    1. McEwan P, Foos V, Palmer JL, et al. . Validation of the IMS core diabetes model. Value Health 2014;17:714–24. 10.1016/j.jval.2014.07.007
    1. Lachin JM, McGee PL, Greenbaum CJ, et al. . Sample size requirements for studies of treatment effects on beta-cell function in newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes. PLoS One 2011;6:e26471 10.1371/journal.pone.0026471

Source: PubMed

3
订阅