Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells for acute lymphoid leukemia

Stephan A Grupp, Michael Kalos, David Barrett, Richard Aplenc, David L Porter, Susan R Rheingold, David T Teachey, Anne Chew, Bernd Hauck, J Fraser Wright, Michael C Milone, Bruce L Levine, Carl H June, Stephan A Grupp, Michael Kalos, David Barrett, Richard Aplenc, David L Porter, Susan R Rheingold, David T Teachey, Anne Chew, Bernd Hauck, J Fraser Wright, Michael C Milone, Bruce L Levine, Carl H June

Abstract

Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells with specificity for CD19 have shown promise in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). It remains to be established whether chimeric antigen receptor T cells have clinical activity in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Two children with relapsed and refractory pre-B-cell ALL received infusions of T cells transduced with anti-CD19 antibody and a T-cell signaling molecule (CTL019 chimeric antigen receptor T cells), at a dose of 1.4×10(6) to 1.2×10(7) CTL019 cells per kilogram of body weight. In both patients, CTL019 T cells expanded to a level that was more than 1000 times as high as the initial engraftment level, and the cells were identified in bone marrow. In addition, the chimeric antigen receptor T cells were observed in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), where they persisted at high levels for at least 6 months. Eight grade 3 or 4 adverse events were noted. The cytokine-release syndrome and B-cell aplasia developed in both patients. In one child, the cytokine-release syndrome was severe; cytokine blockade with etanercept and tocilizumab was effective in reversing the syndrome and did not prevent expansion of chimeric antigen receptor T cells or reduce antileukemic efficacy. Complete remission was observed in both patients and is ongoing in one patient at 11 months after treatment. The other patient had a relapse, with blast cells that no longer expressed CD19, approximately 2 months after treatment. Chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells are capable of killing even aggressive, treatment-refractory acute leukemia cells in vivo. The emergence of tumor cells that no longer express the target indicates a need to target other molecules in addition to CD19 in some patients with ALL.

Figures

Figure 1. Clinical Responses to CTL019 Infusion…
Figure 1. Clinical Responses to CTL019 Infusion in Two Children with Relapsed, Chemotherapy-Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL)
The two children, both of whom had CD19+ B-cell– precursor ALL, received infusions of CTL019 cells on day 0. Panel A shows changes in serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and body temperature after CTL019 infusion, with the maximum temperature per 24-hour period indicated by the circles. Patient 1 was given methylprednisolone starting on day 5 at a dose of 2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day, tapered to 0 by day 12. On the morning of day 7, etanercept was given at a dose of 0.8 mg per kilogram. At 6 p.m. on day 7, tocilizumab was given at a dose of 8 mg per kilogram. A transient improvement in pyrexia occurred after the administration of glucocorticoids on day 5, with complete resolution of fevers occurring after the administration of cytokine-directed therapy. Panel B shows serum levels of cytokines and inflammatory markers measured at the indicated time points after CTL019 infusion. Cytokine values are shown with the use of a semilogarithmic plot indicating change from baseline. Baseline values (on day 0 before infusion) in Patient 1 and Patient 2, respectively, were as follows: interleukin-1β, 0.9 and 0.2 pg per milliliter; interleukin-6, 4.3 and 1.9 pg per milliliter; interferon-γ, 0.08 and 0.23 pg per milliliter; tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α), 1.5 and 0.4 pg per milliliter; interleukin-2 receptor α, 418.8 and 205.7 pg per milliliter; interleukin-2, 0.7 and 0.4 pg per milliliter; interleukin-10, 9.9 and 2.3 pg per milliliter; and interleukin-1 receptor α, 43.9 and 27.9 pg per milliliter. Pronounced elevations in a number of cytokines and cytokine receptors developed in both patients, including soluble interleukin-1 receptor α; interleukin-2 receptor; interleukin-2, 6, and 10; TNF-α; and inter fer on-γ. Panel C shows changes in the circulating absolute neutrophil count (ANC), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC), and white-cell count. The increase in the ALC was primarily from activated CTL019 T lymphocytes.
Figure 2. Expansion and Visualization of CTL019…
Figure 2. Expansion and Visualization of CTL019 Cells in Peripheral Blood, Bone Marrow, and Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF)
Panel A shows the results of flow-cytometric analysis of peripheral blood stained with antibodies to detect CD3 and the anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor. Both the x and y axes are log10 scales. Depicted is the percentage of CD3 cells expressing the chimeric antigen receptor in Patients 1 and 2. Panel B shows the presence of CTL019 T cells in peripheral blood, bone marrow, and CSF as assessed by means of a quantitative real-time polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) assay. Genomic DNA was isolated from samples of whole blood, bone marrow aspirate, and CSF collected at serial time points before and after CTL019 infusion. The 1% marking line represents the number of detected transgene copies that would be expected if 1% of the total cells in the sample contained a single integration of the chimeric antigen receptor transgene. Panel C shows flow-cyto-metric detection of CTL019 cells in CSF from Patients 1 and 2. FMO denotes fluorescence minus one. Both the x and y axes are log10 scales. Panel D shows activated large granular lymphocytes in Wright-stained smears of the peripheral blood and cytospin preparations of CSF from Patient 2.
Figure 3. CD19 Expression at Baseline and…
Figure 3. CD19 Expression at Baseline and at the Time of Relapse in Patient 2
Bone marrow samples were obtained from Patient 2 before CTL019 infusion and at the time of relapse, 2 months later. Mononuclear cells isolated from marrow samples were stained for CD45, CD34, and CD19 and analyzed on an Accuri C6 flow cytometer. After a gating on live cells, the blast gate (CD45+ side scatter [SSC] low) was subgated on CD34+ cells, and histograms were generated for CD19 expression. The vertical line in each graph represents the threshold for the same gating on isotype controls. Pretherapy blasts (Panel A) have a range of distribution of CD19, with a small population of very dim-staining cells seen as the tail at the left of the histogram at 102 on the x axis. The numbers on the x axis are arbitrary fluorescence intensity units. The sample obtained at the time of relapse (Panel B) does not have any CD19+ blasts. Analysis of CD19 expression on the pretreatment blast population revealed a small population of CD19+dim or CD19– cells. The mean fluorescence intensity of this small population of cells was 187 units, which is similar to that of the anti-CD19–stained blast cells at relapse, 201 units. The pretherapy marrow sample was hypocellular, with 10% blasts, and the marrow sample at relapse was normocellular, with 68% blasts, accounting for differences in the number of events (cells) available for acquisition.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅