Long-term clinical benefit of sirolimus-eluting stents in patients with in-stent restenosis results of the RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study
Fernando Alfonso, María-José Pérez-Vizcayno, Rosana Hernández, Armando Bethencourt, Vicens Martí, José R López-Mínguez, Juan Angel, Andrés Iñiguez, César Morís, Angel Cequier, Manel Sabaté, Javier Escaned, Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo, Camino Bañuelos, Alfonso Suárez, Carlos Macaya, RIBS-II Investigators, Fernando Alfonso, María-José Pérez-Vizcayno, Rosana Hernández, Armando Bethencourt, Vicens Martí, José R López-Mínguez, Juan Angel, Andrés Iñiguez, César Morís, Angel Cequier, Manel Sabaté, Javier Escaned, Pilar Jiménez-Quevedo, Camino Bañuelos, Alfonso Suárez, Carlos Macaya, RIBS-II Investigators
Abstract
Objectives: We sought to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients with in-stent restenosis (ISR).
Background: Treatment of patients with ISR remains a challenge. The long-term outcome of patients with ISR treated with SES remains unknown.
Methods: The RIBS-II (Restenosis Intra-stent: Balloon angioplasty vs. elective sirolimus-eluting Stenting) study was a randomized trial conducted in 150 patients with ISR (76 SES, 74 balloon angioplasty [BA]). The long-term (>1 year) clinical outcome and pre-specified subgroup analyses were pre-defined secondary study end points.
Results: At 1 year, the event-free survival (death, myocardial infarction, target vessel revascularization [TVR]) was better in the SES group (88% vs. 69%, p < 0.005). Additional long-term (>3 years) clinical follow-up was obtained in 97% of patients (median 3.3 years). After the first year, 3 patients died (1 SES, 2 BA), 5 suffered myocardial infarction (4 SES, 1 BA), and 7 required TVR (4 SES, 3 BA). At last follow-up, definitive/probable/possible stent thrombosis was similar in both groups (2/2/1 SES vs. 1/0/3 BA, p = NS). At 4 years, the event-free survival was 76% in the SES arm and 65% in the BA arm (p = 0.019). On multivariate analysis, SES implantation was an independent predictor of event-free survival. Subgroup analyses were consistent with the main outcome measure.
Conclusions: In patients with ISR, SES implantation remains effective and safe at very long-term clinical follow-up.
Source: PubMed