Osimertinib in advanced EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma with asymptomatic brain metastases: an open-label, 3-arm, phase II pilot study

Nir Peled, Waleed Kian, Edna Inbar, Iris M Goldstein, Melanie Zemel, Ofer Rotem, Anna B Rozenblum, Hovav Nechushtan, Elizabeth Dudnik, Daniel Levin, Alona Zer, Shoshana Keren-Rosenberg, Shlomit Yust-Katz, Vered Fuchs, Areen A Remilah, Ilan Shelef, Laila C Roisman, Nir Peled, Waleed Kian, Edna Inbar, Iris M Goldstein, Melanie Zemel, Ofer Rotem, Anna B Rozenblum, Hovav Nechushtan, Elizabeth Dudnik, Daniel Levin, Alona Zer, Shoshana Keren-Rosenberg, Shlomit Yust-Katz, Vered Fuchs, Areen A Remilah, Ilan Shelef, Laila C Roisman

Abstract

Background: Osimertinib is selective for both epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) sensitizing and Thr790Met mutations. While intracranial activity of osimertinib is documented in larger trials, a prospective study focusing exclusively on patients with asymptomatic brain metastases has not been reported.

Methods: In this nonrandomized, phase II, open-label, 3-arm prospective proof-of-concept pilot study, 48 patients with metastatic EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) received osimertinib 80 mg daily. Patients were either treatment naive (arm A = 20) or previously treated with an EGFR-TKI and Thr790Met positive (arm B = 18) or negative (arm C = 10). In cases of isolated intracranial progression, osimertinib dose was escalated (160 mg). The primary endpoints were intracranial objective response rate (iORR) and intracranial disease control rate (iDCR). The secondary endpoint was intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). This study is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02736513.

Results: The iORRs were 84.2%, 66.7%, and 50% and the iDCRs were 94.7%, 94.4%, and 80% in arms A, B, and C, respectively. The median iPFS was 11.8 months (95% CI 7.7 to NA), 7.6 months (95% CI 5.3 to NA), and 6.3 months (95% CI 3.9 to NA) in arms A, B, and C, respectively. Following dose escalation, pooled iORR was 54% (arm A = 5, arm B = 4, arm C = 2). Adverse events were similar to those in previously published literature.

Conclusion: Osimertinib demonstrated high efficacy on brain metastases. All trial arms displayed a significant decrease in the number and diameter of target lesions. These findings indicate that osimertinib is effective for Thr790Met-positive and -negative LUAD patients with asymptomatic brain metastases. Therefore, osimertinib should be considered a viable option for EGFR-mutant patients with brain involvement regardless of their Thr790Met mutation status.

Keywords: EGFR; LUAD; Thr790Met; brain metastases; osimertinib.

© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Efficacy of osimertinib in all treatment arms. (A) Illustrates the intracranial and systemic efficacy of osimertinib in each arm of the trial. The percent of patients that reached ORR in each study arm is represented by each bar. 95% CIs for intracranial ORR and DCR are included in blocked parentheses. aAnalysis was done on 19 patients with 1 participant being excluded following molecular profiling. CR, complete response; DCR, disease control rate; ORR, objective response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease. (B) Waterfall plot of each arm demonstrates the best percentage change in intracranial target lesions from baseline. Complete response (n = 18), partial response (n = 15), stable disease (n = 10), and progressive disease (n = 4).
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) The Kaplan–Meier plot of intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS) by study arm (P = .11), the dashed line indicates 50% (median iPFS). (B) The Kaplan–Meier plot of overall survival (OS) by study arm (P = .37), the dashed line indicates 50% (median OS).
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Illustrates the changes in diameter of target brain lesions from the time of enrollment to the time of best intracranial response. A significant decrease in the median diameter of target brain lesions is seen throughout all arms. The number and diameter of target lesions, and their corresponding P values, at each time point, are proved in the table.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Spider chart illustrating the median change in diameter from baseline for each arm. Dashed vertical lines represent the median time on trial to dose escalation for arm A = 61.33 weeks (blue), arm B = 28.5 weeks (orange), and arm C = 60 weeks (green).

References

    1. Wang S, Cang S, Liu D. Third-generation inhibitors targeting EGFR T790M mutation in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. J Hematol Oncol. 2016;9(1):9–34. doi:10.1186/s13045-016-0268-z
    1. Mazza V, Cappuzzo F. Treating EGFR mutation resistance in non-small cell lung cancer—role of osimertinib. Appl Clin Genet. 2017;10:49–56. doi:10.2147/TACG.S103471. PMID:28794650; PMCID:PMC5536882.
    1. Westover D, Zugazagoitia J, Cho BC, Lovly CM, Paz-Ares L. Mechanisms of acquired resistance to first- and second-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Ann Oncol. 2018;29:i10–i19. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx703. PMID:29462254; PMCID:PMC6454547.
    1. Fuchs V, Roisman L, Kian W, et al. . The impact of osimertinib’ line on clonal evolution in EGFRm NSCLC through NGS-based liquid biopsy and overcoming strategies for resistance. Lung Cancer. 2021;29(3):687–693. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.12.039
    1. Cross DA, Ashton SE, Ghiorghiu S, et al. . AZD9291, an irreversible EGFR TKI, overcomes T790M-mediated resistance to EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2014;4(9):1046–1061.
    1. Mok TS, Wu YL, Ahn MJ, et al. . Osimertinib or platinum-pemetrexed in EGFR T790M-positive lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):629–640.
    1. Takeda M, Nakagawa K. First-and second-generation EGFR-TKIs are all replaced to osimertinib in chemo-naive EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer? Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(1):1–20. doi:10.3390/ijms20010146
    1. Ramalingam SS, Vansteenkiste J, Planchard D, et al. . Overall survival with osimertinib in untreated, EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC. N Engl J Med. 2020;382(1):41–50.
    1. Omuro AMP, Kris MG, Miller VA, et al. . High incidence of disease recurrence in the brain and leptomeninges in patients with nonsmall cell lung carcinoma after response to gefitinib. Cancer. 2005;103(11):2344–2348.
    1. Bhatt VR, D’Souza SP, Smith LM, et al. . Epidermal growth factor receptor mutational status and brain metastases in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Glob Oncol. 2017;3(3):208–217.
    1. Tan CS, Cho BC, Soo RA. Treatment options for EGFR mutant NSCLC with CNS involvement—can patients BLOOM with the use of next generation EGFR TKIs? Lung Cancer. 2017;108:29–37. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.02.012. Epub 2017 Feb 22. PMID:28625644.
    1. Jackman DM, Holmes AJ, Lindeman N, et al. . Response and resistance in a non-small-cell lung cancer patient with an epidermal growth factor receptor mutation and leptomeningeal metastases treated with high-dose gefitinib. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24(27):4517–4520.
    1. Hata A, Katakami N, Yoshioka H, et al. . Rebiopsy of non-small cell lung cancer patients with acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Cancer. 2013;119(24):4325–4332.
    1. Attia A, Page BR, Lesser GJ, Chan M. Treatment of radiation-induced cognitive decline. Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2014;15(4):539–550.
    1. Ballard P, Yates JWT, Yang Z, et al. . Preclinical comparison of osimertinib with other EGFR-TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC brain metastases models, and early evidence of clinical brain metastases activity. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(20):5130–5140.
    1. Costa DB, Schumer ST, Tenen DG, Kobayashi S. Differential responses to erlotinib in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated lung cancers with acquired resistance to gefitinib carrying the L747S or T790M secondary mutations. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(7):1182–1184; author reply 1184.
    1. Li D, Ambrogio L, Shimamura T, et al. . BIBW2992, an irreversible EGFR/HER2 inhibitor highly effective in preclinical lung cancer models. Oncogene. 2008;27(34):4702–4711.
    1. Goss G, Tsai CM, Shepherd FA, et al. . CNS response to osimertinib in patients with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC: pooled data from two Phase II trials. Ann Oncol. 2017;29(3):687–693. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdx820
    1. Mok T, Ahn MJ, Han JY, et al. . CNS response to osimertinib in patients (pts) with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC: data from a randomized phase III trial (AURA3). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(15 suppl):9005–9005. doi:10.1200/JCO.2017.35.15_suppl.9005
    1. Soria JC, Ohe Y, Vansteenkiste J, et al. . Osimertinib in untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2017;378(2):113–125. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1713137
    1. How J, Mann J, Laczniak AN, Baggstrom MQ. Pulsatile erlotinib in EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer patients with leptomeningeal and brain metastases: review of the literature. Clin Lung Cancer. 2017;18(4):354–363.
    1. Peled N, Zach L, Liran O, Ilouze M, Bunn PA, Hirsch FR. Effective crizotinib schedule for brain metastases in ALK rearrangement metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8(12):112–113. doi:10.1097/JTO.0000000000000038
    1. Cordova C, Chi AS, Chachoua A, et al. . Osimertinib dose escalation induces regression of progressive EGFR T790M-mutant leptomeningeal lung adenocarcinoma. J Thorac Oncol. 2017;12(11):e188–e190.
    1. Piper-Vallillo A, Rotow JK, Aredo JV, et al. . High-dose osimertinib for CNS progression in EGFR+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a multi-institutional experience. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15 suppl):9586. doi:10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9586
    1. Eide IJZ, Helland Å, Ekman S, et al. . Osimertinib in T790M-positive and -negative patients with EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (the TREM-study). Lung Cancer. 2020;143:27–35. doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.03.009. Epub 2020 Mar 12. PMID:32200138.
    1. Erickson AW, Brastianos PK, Das S. Assessment of effectiveness and safety of osimertinib for patients with intracranial metastatic disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(3):e201617.
    1. Lin NU, Lee EQ, Aoyama H, et al. ; Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) group . Response assessment criteria for brain metastases: proposal from the RANO group. Lancet Oncol. 2015;16(6):e270–e278.
    1. Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, et al. . New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–247.
    1. Goldstein IM, Roisman LC, Keren-Rosenberg S, et al. . Dose escalation of osimertinib for intracranial progression in EGFR mutated non-small-cell lung cancer with brain metastases. Neurooncol Adv. 2020;2(1):vdaa125.
    1. Kelly WJ, Shah NJ, Subramaniam DS. Management of brain metastases in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant non-small-cell lung cancer. Front Oncol. 2018;8:208. doi:10.3389/fonc.2018.00208. PMID:30018881; PMCID:PMC6037690.
    1. Reungwetwattana T, Nakagawa K, Cho BC, et al. . CNS response to osimertinib versus standard epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:3290–3297. doi:10.1200/JCO.2018.78.3118. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 30153097.
    1. Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, Shuto T, et al. . Stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901): a multi-institutional prospective observational study. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(4):387–395.
    1. Li L, Luo S, Lin H, et al. . Correlation between EGFR mutation status and the incidence of brain metastases in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Dis. 2017;9(8):2510–2520.
    1. Shin DY, Na II, Kim CH, Park S, Baek H, Yang SH. EGFR mutation and brain metastasis in pulmonary adenocarcinomas. J Thorac Oncol. 2014;9(2):195–199.
    1. Yamamoto M, Serizawa T, Higuchi Y, et al. . A multi-institutional prospective observational study of stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with multiple brain metastases (JLGK0901 Study Update): irradiation-related complications and long-term maintenance of mini-mental state examination scores. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2017;99(1):31–40.
    1. Sequist LV, Bell DW, Lynch TJ, Haber DA. Molecular predictors of response to epidermal growth factor receptor antagonists in non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25(5):587–595.
    1. Yang JCH, Kim DW, Kim SW, et al. . Osimertinib activity in patients (pts) with leptomeningeal (LM) disease from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): updated results from BLOOM, a phase I study. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34(15 suppl):9002. doi:10.1200/JCO.2016.34.15_suppl.9002
    1. Arulananda S, Do H, Rivalland G, et al. . Standard dose osimertinib for erlotinib refractory T790M-negative EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal disease. J Thorac Dis. 2019;11(5):1756–1764.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅