Diagnosis and treatment of musculoskeletal chest pain: design of a multi-purpose trial

Mette J Stochkendahl, Henrik W Christensen, Werner Vach, Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen, Torben Haghfelt, Jan Hartvigsen, Mette J Stochkendahl, Henrik W Christensen, Werner Vach, Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen, Torben Haghfelt, Jan Hartvigsen

Abstract

Background: Acute chest pain is a major health problem all over the western world. Active approaches are directed towards diagnosis and treatment of potentially life threatening conditions, especially acute coronary syndrome/ischemic heart disease. However, according to the literature, chest pain may also be due to a variety of extra-cardiac disorders including dysfunction of muscles and joints of the chest wall or the cervical and thoracic part of the spine. The diagnostic approaches and treatment options for this group of patients are scarce and formal clinical studies addressing the effect of various treatments are lacking.

Methods/design: We present an ongoing trial on the potential usefulness of chiropractic diagnosis and treatment in patients dismissed from an acute chest pain clinic without a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome. The aims are to determine the proportion of patients in whom chest pain may be of musculoskeletal rather than cardiac origin and to investigate the decision process of a chiropractor in diagnosing these patients; further, to examine whether chiropractic treatment can reduce pain and improve physical function when compared to advice directed towards promoting self-management, and, finally, to estimate the cost-effectiveness of these procedures. This study will include 300 patients discharged from a university hospital acute chest pain clinic without a diagnosis of acute coronary syndrome or any other obvious cardiac or non-cardiac disease. After completion of the clinic's standard cardiovascular diagnostic procedures, trial patients will be examined according to a standardized protocol including a) a self-report questionnaire; b) a semi-structured interview; c) a general health examination; and d) a specific manual examination of the muscles and joints of the neck, thoracic spine, and thorax in order to determine whether the pain is likely to be of musculoskeletal origin. To describe the patients status with regards to ischemic heart disease, and to compare and indirectly validate the musculoskeletal diagnosis, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy is performed in all patients 2-4 weeks following discharge. Descriptive statistics including parametric and non-parametric methods will be applied in order to compare patients with and without musculoskeletal chest pain in relation to their scintigraphic findings. The decision making process of the chiropractor will be elucidated and reconstructed using the CART method. Out of the 300 patients 120 intended patients with suspected musculoskeletal chest pain will be randomized into one of two groups: a) a course of chiropractic treatment (therapy group) of up to ten treatment sessions focusing on high velocity, low amplitude manipulation of the cervical and thoracic spine, mobilisation, and soft tissue techniques. b) Advice promoting self-management and individual instructions focusing on posture and muscle stretch (advice group). Outcome measures are pain, physical function, overall health, self-perceived treatment effect, and cost-effectiveness.

Discussion: This study may potentially demonstrate that a chiropractor is able to identify a subset of patients suffering from chest pain predominantly of musculoskeletal origin among patients discharged from an acute chest pain clinic with no apparent cardiac condition. Furthermore knowledge about the benefits of manual treatment of patients with musculoskeletal chest pain will inform clinical decision and policy development in relation to clinical practice.

Trial registration: NCT00462241 and NCT00373828.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evaluation, intervention and follow up. (Adapted from Perera et al. 2007).

References

    1. Bechgaard P. [Segmentally thoracic pain in patients admitted to a coronary care unit] Ugeskr Laeger. 1982;144:13–15.
    1. Videbæk J, Madsen M. [Heart statistics 2004.] Hjerteforeningen i samarbejde med Statens Institut for Folkesundhed 3-8-2007.
    1. McCaig L, Nawar EW. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2004 Emergency Department Summary. Advance Data From Vital and Health Statistics. 2006.
    1. Chambers J, Bass C, Mayou R. Non-cardiac chest pain: assessment and management. Heart. 1999;82:656–657.
    1. Eslick GD, Jones MP, Talley NJ. Acute chest pain and health care seeking behaviour: role of reflux symptoms [abstract] J Gastroenterology and Hepatology. 2001;16:A106. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1746.2001.2421a.x.
    1. Panju A, Farkouh ME, Sackett DL, Waterfall W, Hunt R, Fallen E, Somers S, Stevenson G, Walther S. Outcome of patients discharged from a coronary care unit with a diagnosis of " chest pain not yet diagnosed". Can Med Assoc J. 1996;155:541–546.
    1. Galassi AR, Azzarelli S, Tomaselli A, Giosofatto R, Ragusa A, Musumeci S, Tamburino C, Giuffrida G. Incremental prognostic value of technetium-99m-tetrofosmin exercise myocardial perfusion imaging for predicting outcomes in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:101–106. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9149(01)01601-0.
    1. Klocke FJ, Baird MG, Lorell BH, Bateman TM, Messer JV, Berman DS, O'Gara PT, Carabello BA, Russell RO, Jr, Cerqueira MD, St.John Sutton MG, DeMaria AN, Udelson JE, Kennedy JW, Verani MS, Williams KA, Antman EM, Smith SC, Jr, Alpert JS, Gregoratos G, Anderson JL, Hiratzka LF, Faxon DP, Hunt SA, Fuster V, Jacobs AK, Gibbons RJ, Russell RO. ACC/AHA/ASNC guidelines for the clinical use of cardiac radionuclide imaging–executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/ASNC Committee to Revise the 1995 Guidelines for the Clinical Use of Cardiac Radionuclide Imaging) Circulation. 2003;108:1404–1418. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000080946.42225.4D.
    1. Hachamovitch R, Berman DS. The use of nuclear cardiology in clinical decision making. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35:62–72. doi: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2004.09.005.
    1. Ockene IS, Shay MJ, Alpert JS, Weiner BH, Dalen JE. Unexplained chest pain in patients with normal coronary arteriograms: a follow-up study of functional status. N Engl J Med. 1980;303:1249–1252.
    1. Wielgosz AT, Fletcher RH, McCants CB, McKinnis RA, Haney TL, Williams RB. Unimproved chest pain in patients with minimal or no coronary disease: a behavioral phenomenon. Am Heart J. 1984;108:67–72. doi: 10.1016/0002-8703(84)90546-5.
    1. Tew R, Guthrie EA, Creed FH, Cotter L, Kisely S, Tomenson B. A long-term follow-up study of patients with ischaemic heart disease versus patients with nonspecific chest pain. J Psychosom Res. 1995;39:977–985. doi: 10.1016/0022-3999(95)00065-8.
    1. Launbjerg J, Fruergaard P, Hesse B, Jorgensen F, Elsborg L, Petri A. [The long-term prognosis of patients with acute chest pain of various origins] Ugeskr Laeger. 1997;159:175–179.
    1. Achem SR, DeVault KR. Recent developments in chest pain of undetermined origin. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2000;2:201–209. doi: 10.1007/s11894-000-0062-4.
    1. Eslick GD, Coulshed DS. Rapid assessment of chest pain. Chest pain clinics may be one step forward, two steps back. BMJ. 2002;324:422. doi: 10.1136/bmj.324.7334.422.
    1. Spalding L, Reay E, Kelly C. Cause and outcome of atypical chest pain in patients admitted to hospital. J R Soc Med. 2003;96:122–125. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.96.3.122.
    1. Fruergaard P, Launbjerg J, Hesse B, Jorgensen F, Petri A, Eiken P, Aggestrup S, Elsborg L, Mellemgaard K. The diagnoses of patients admitted with acute chest pain but without myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J. 1996;17:1028–1034.
    1. Knockaert DC, Buntinx F, Stoens N, Bruyninckx R, Delooz H. Chest pain in the emergency department: the broad spectrum of causes. Eur J Emerg Med. 2002;9:25–30. doi: 10.1097/00063110-200203000-00007.
    1. Haghfelt T, Alstrup P, Grande P, Madsen JK, Rasmussen K, Thiis J. Consensus report Danish Society for Cardiology and Danish Society for Thoracic Surgery. Copenhagen, Own publisher; 1996. [Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of patients with stable angina pectoris] pp. 1–40.
    1. Erhardt L, Herlitz J, Bossaert L, Halinen M, Keltai M, Koster R, Marcassa C, Quinn T, van Weert H. Task force on the management of chest pain. Eur Heart J. 2002;23:1153–1176. doi: 10.1053/euhj.2002.3194.
    1. Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PK, Douglas JS, Ferguson TB, Fihn SD, Fraker TD, Gardin JM, O'Rourke RA, Pasternak RC, Williams SV. ACC/AHA 2002 Guideline update for management of patients with chronic stable angina 17-11-2002. 17-10-2007.
    1. Fox K, Garcia MA, Ardissino D, Buszman P, Camici PG, Crea F, Daly C, de Backer G, Hjemdahl P, Lopez-Sendon J, Marco J, Morais J, Pepper J, Sechtem U, Simoons M, Thygesen K, Priori SG, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Camm J, Dean V, Deckers J, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Tamargo J, Zamorano JL. Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: executive summary: the Task Force on the Management of Stable Angina Pectoris of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2006;27:1341–1381. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl001.
    1. Eslick GD, Fass R. Noncardiac chest pain: evaluation and treatment. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2003;32:531–552. doi: 10.1016/S0889-8553(03)00029-3.
    1. Fleet RP, Dupuis G, Marchand A, Burelle D, Beitman BD. Panic disorder, chest pain and coronary artery disease: literature review. Can J Cardiol. 1994;10:827–834.
    1. Zachariae R, Melchiorsen H, Frobert O, Bjerring P, Bagger JP. Experimental pain and psychologic status of patients with chest pain with normal coronary arteries or ischemic heart disease. Am Heart J. 2001;142:63–71. doi: 10.1067/mhj.2001.115794.
    1. Christensen HW, Vach W, Gichangi A, Manniche C, Haghfelt T, HOilund-Carlsen PF. Cervicothoracic angina identified by case history and palpation findings in patients with stable angina pectoris. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28:303–311. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.04.002.
    1. Christensen HW, Vach W, Gichangi A, Manniche C, Haghfelt T, Høilund-Carlsen PF. Manual therapy for patients with stable angina pectoris: a nonrandomized open prospective trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2005;28:654–661. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2005.09.018.
    1. Campeau L. Letter: Grading of angina pectoris. Circulation. 1976;54:522–523.
    1. The Criteria Committee of the New York Heart Association . Nomenclature and Criteria for Diagnosis of Diseases of the Heart and Great Vessels. 9. Boston MLB&C; 1994. pp. 253–256. 1994 Revisions to Classification of Functional Capacity and Objective Assessment of Patients With Diseases of the Heart. . 2007. 18-10-2007.
    1. Perera R, Heneghan C, Yudkin P. Graphical method for depicting randomised trials of complex interventions. BMJ. 2007;334:127–129. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39045.396817.68.
    1. Bjorner JB, Damsgaard MT, Watt T, Groenvold M. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability of the Danish SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1001–1011. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00092-4.
    1. Bjorner JB, Kreiner S, Ware JE, Damsgaard MT, Bech P. Differential item functioning in the Danish translation of the SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:1189–1202. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00111-5.
    1. Westaway M, Stratford PW, Binkley J. The patient specific funtional scale: Validation of its use in people with neck dysfunction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27:331–338.
    1. Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60:631–637. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2005.10.020.
    1. EuroQol-a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy. 1990;16:199–208. doi: 10.1016/0168-8510(90)90421-9.
    1. Brazier J, Deverill M, Green C. A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy. 1999;4:174–184.
    1. Breiman L, Friedman J, Olshen R, Stone C. Classification and regression trees. Belmont, California: Wadsworth; 1984.
    1. Stochkendahl MJ, Christensen HW, Hartvigsen J, Vach W, Haas M, Hestbaek L, Adams A, Bronfort G. Manual examination of the spine: a systematic critical literature review of reproducibility. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:475–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.06.011.
    1. Norman GR, Stratford P, Regehr G. Methodological problems in the retrospective computation of responsiveness to change: the lesson of Cronbach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:869–879. doi: 10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00097-8.
    1. Sorensen LP, Stochkendahl MJ, Hartvigsen J, Nilsson NG. Chiropractic patients in Denmark 2002: an expanded description and comparison with 1999 survey. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2006;29:419–424. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2006.06.001.
    1. Hesse B, Tagil K, Cuocolo A, Anagnostopoulos C, Bardies M, Bax J, Bengel F, Busemann Sokole, Davies G, Dondi M, Edenbrandt L, Franken P, Kjaer A, Knuuti J, Lassmann M, Ljungberg M, Marcassa C, Marie PY, McKiddie F, O'Connor M, Prvulovich E, Underwood R, van Eck-Smit B. EANM/ESC procedural guidelines for myocardial perfusion imaging in nuclear cardiology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2005;32:855–897. doi: 10.1007/s00259-005-1779-y.
    1. Germano G, Kavanagh PB, Berman DS. An automatic approach to the analysis, quantitation and review of perfusion and function from myocardial perfusion SPECT images. Int J Card Imaging. 1997;13:337–346. doi: 10.1023/A:1005815206195.
    1. Berman DS, Germano G, editor. Clinical Gated Cardiac SPECT New York. 1999. An approach to the Interpretation and Reporting of Gated Myocardial Perfusion SPECT; pp. 155–158.
    1. Johansen A, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Christensen HW, Vach W, Jorgensen HB, Veje A, Haghfelt T. Diagnostic accuracy of myocardial perfusion imaging in a study population without post-test referral bias. J Nucl Cardiol. 2005;12:530–537. doi: 10.1016/j.nuclcard.2005.04.012.

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅