The frequency of diagnostic errors in outpatient care: estimations from three large observational studies involving US adult populations

Hardeep Singh, Ashley N D Meyer, Eric J Thomas, Hardeep Singh, Ashley N D Meyer, Eric J Thomas

Abstract

Background: The frequency of outpatient diagnostic errors is challenging to determine due to varying error definitions and the need to review data across multiple providers and care settings over time. We estimated the frequency of diagnostic errors in the US adult population by synthesising data from three previous studies of clinic-based populations that used conceptually similar definitions of diagnostic error.

Methods: Data sources included two previous studies that used electronic triggers, or algorithms, to detect unusual patterns of return visits after an initial primary care visit or lack of follow-up of abnormal clinical findings related to colorectal cancer, both suggestive of diagnostic errors. A third study examined consecutive cases of lung cancer. In all three studies, diagnostic errors were confirmed through chart review and defined as missed opportunities to make a timely or correct diagnosis based on available evidence. We extrapolated the frequency of diagnostic error obtained from our studies to the US adult population, using the primary care study to estimate rates of diagnostic error for acute conditions (and exacerbations of existing conditions) and the two cancer studies to conservatively estimate rates of missed diagnosis of colorectal and lung cancer (as proxies for other serious chronic conditions).

Results: Combining estimates from the three studies yielded a rate of outpatient diagnostic errors of 5.08%, or approximately 12 million US adults every year. Based upon previous work, we estimate that about half of these errors could potentially be harmful.

Conclusions: Our population-based estimate suggests that diagnostic errors affect at least 1 in 20 US adults. This foundational evidence should encourage policymakers, healthcare organisations and researchers to start measuring and reducing diagnostic errors.

Keywords: Chart Review Methodologies; Diagnostic Errors; Medical Error, Measurement/Epidemiology; Patient Safety; Trigger Tools.

Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Schematic of synthesis of diagnostic error frequency data from three studies.

References

    1. Singh H, Thomas E, Khan MM, et al. Identifying diagnostic errors in primary care using an electronic screening algorithm. Arch Intern Med 2007;167:302–8
    1. Singh H, Weingart SN. Diagnostic errors in ambulatory care: dimensions and preventive strategies. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract 2009;14(Suppl 1):57–61
    1. Graber ML. The incidence of diagnostic error in medicine. BMJ Qual Saf 2013;22(Suppl 2):ii21–7
    1. Murphy DR, Laxmisan A, Reis BA, et al. Electronic health record-based triggers to detect potential delays in cancer diagnosis. BMJ Qual Saf 2014;23:8–16
    1. Singh H, Hirani K, Kadiyala H, et al. Characteristics and predictors of missed opportunities in lung cancer diagnosis: an electronic health record-based study. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:3307–15
    1. Singh H, Giardina TD, Forjuoh SN, et al. Electronic health record-based surveillance of diagnostic errors in primary care. BMJ Qual Saf 2012;21:93–100
    1. Schiff GD, Hasan O, Kim S, et al. Diagnostic error in medicine: analysis of 583 physician-reported errors. Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1881–7
    1. Singh H, Kadiyala H, Bhagwath G, et al. Using a multifaceted approach to improve the follow-up of positive fecal occult blood test results. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:942–52
    1. Singh H, Thomas EJ, Mani S, et al. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med 2009;169:1578–86
    1. Singh H, Daci K, Petersen L, et al. Missed opportunities to initiate endoscopic evaluation for colorectal cancer diagnosis. Am J Gastroenterol 2009;104:2543–54
    1. Gandhi TK, Kachalia A, Thomas EJ, et al. Missed and delayed diagnoses in the ambulatory setting: a study of closed malpractice claims. Ann Intern Med 2006;145:488–96
    1. Schiff GD, Puopolo AL, Huben-Kearney A, et al. Primary care closed claims experience of Massachusetts malpractice insurers. JAMA Intern Med 2013;173:2063–8
    1. Jones R, Latinovic R, Charlton J, et al. Alarm symptoms in early diagnosis of cancer in primary care: cohort study using General Practice Research Database. BMJ 2007;334:1040.
    1. Annual Estimates of the Resident Population by Sex, Age, Race, and Hispanic Origin for the United States and States: 1 April 2010 to 1 July 2012. US Census Bureau, Population Division [serial online] 2013; (accessed 18 Feb 2014). .
    1. Schiller JS, Lucas JW, Ward BW, et al. Summary health statistics for U.S. adults: National Health Interview Survey, 2010. Vital Health Stat 2012;10:1–207
    1. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2012. Ref Type: Report
    1. Singh H, Giardina TD, Meyer AN, et al. Types and origins of diagnostic errors in primary care settings. JAMA Intern Med 2013:1–8
    1. Weingart SN, Saadeh MG, Simchowitz B, et al. Process of care failures in breast cancer diagnosis. J Gen Intern Med 2009;24:702–9
    1. Patient Experience March 2009. Consumer Reports National Research Center [serial online] 2013; (accessed 28 Oct 2013).
    1. Singh H, Thomas EJ, Wilson L, et al. Errors of diagnosis in pediatric practice: a multisite survey. Pediatrics 2010;126:70–9
    1. Elstein AS. Clinical reasoning in medicine. In: Higgs J, Jones MA. eds Clinical reasoning in the health professions. Woburn, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1995:49–59
    1. Shojania KG, Burton EC. The vanishing nonforensic autopsy. N Engl J Med 2009;358:873–5
    1. Thomas EJ, Petersen LA. Measuring errors and adverse events in health care. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:61–7
    1. McAbee GN, Donn SM, Mendelson RA, et al. Medical diagnoses commonly associated with pediatric malpractice lawsuits in the United States. Pediatrics 2008;122:e1282–6
    1. Phillips R, Jr, Bartholomew LA, Dovey SM, et al. Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:121–6
    1. Thomas EJ, Studdert DM, Burstin HR, et al. Incidence and types of adverse events and negligent care in Utah and Colorado in 1992. Med Care 2000;38:261–71
    1. Kostopoulou O, Delaney BC, Munro CW. Diagnostic difficulty and error in primary care—a systematic review. Fam Pract 2008;25:400–13
    1. Jones RCM, Price D, Ryan D, et al. Opportunities to diagnose chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in routine care in the UK: a retrospective study of a clinical cohort. Lancet Respir Med 2014; Early Online Publication. 13 Feb 2014. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(14)70008-6H

Source: PubMed

赞助者和合作者

医疗条件

药物干预

3
订阅