Usefulness of ultrasound examinations in the diagnostics of necrotizing enterocolitis

Joanna Staryszak, Joanna Stopa, Iwona Kucharska-Miąsik, Magdalena Osuchowska, Wiesław Guz, Witold Błaż, Joanna Staryszak, Joanna Stopa, Iwona Kucharska-Miąsik, Magdalena Osuchowska, Wiesław Guz, Witold Błaż

Abstract

Background: Necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) is one of the most serious disorders of gastrointestinal tract during neonatal period. Early diagnosis and adequate treatment are essential in the presence of clinical suspicion of NEC. Plain abdominal radiography is currently the modality of choice for initial evaluation of gastrointestinal tract in neonates. However, when the diagnosis is uncertain, abdominal ultrasound with bowel assessment might be an important complementary examination. The aim of the study was to evaluate usefulness of ultrasound in the diagnosis of NEC and its value for implementation of proper treatment.

Material/methods: The data of nine neonates diagnosed with NEC, hospitalized at the Provincial Hospital No. 2 in Rzeszow in the period from September 2009 to April 2013 was retrospectively analyzed. Apart from abdominal radiography, abdominal ultrasound with bowel assessment was performed in all nine cases. Imaging findings, epidemiological data, coexisting risk factors and disease course were assessed.

Results: Most children in the group were preterm neonates. Findings in plain abdominal radiography were normal or nonspecific. A wider spectrum of findings was demonstrated in all ultrasound examinations and intestinal pneumatosis, a pathognomonic sign for NEC, was more frequently noted than in plain abdominal x-ray. Most children were treated by surgical intervention with resection of necrotic bowel loops and in more than half of the cases location of changes identified during surgery was concordant with ultrasonographic findings.

Conclusions: Abdominal ultrasound examination might be helpful in the diagnosis of NEC, especially when plain abdominal radiography findings do not correlate with clinical symptoms. However, abdominal radiography is still considered the modality of choice. The range of morphological changes detectable on ultrasound examination is much wider than in plain abdominal radiography. Ultrasound examination allows for more accurate assessment of changes within intestines and adjacent tissues, which aids clinicians in making more accurate therapeutic decisions and implementing proper treatment.

Keywords: Diagnostic Imaging; Emergency Treatment; Neonatology.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Ultrasound image of intestinal pneumatosis of large intestine (arrows).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Plain x-ray performed in left lateral decubitus position: tiny air bubbles within intestinal wall (arrow).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Ultrasound image of portal venous gas (arrows).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Ultrasound image of subsplenic intraperitoneal free air (arrows).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Ultrasound image of thickened, hyperechogenic bowel wall (arrows).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Ultrasound image of echogenic subhepatic intraperitoneal free fluid (star).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Ultrasound image of tiny intraperitoneal calcifications (arrows).

References

    1. Lin PW, Stoll BJ. Necrotising enterocolitis. Lancet. 2006;368(9543):1271–83.
    1. Neu J, Walker WA. Necrotizing enterocolitis. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(3):255–64.
    1. Schnabl KL, Van Aerde JE, Thomson AB, et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis: a multifactorial disease with no cure. World J Gastroenterol. 2008;14(14):2142–61.
    1. Holman RC, Stoll BJ, Curns AT. Necrotising enterocolitis hospitalisations among neonates in the Unites States. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2006;20:498–506.
    1. Clark RZ, Gordon P, Walker WM, et al. Characteristics of patients who die of necrotizing enterocolitis. J Perinatol. 2012;32:199–204.
    1. Bohosiewicz J. Współczesne poglądy na etiopatogenezę obumierającego zapalenia jelit (NEC). Perinatalne i położnicze czynniki ryzyka. Surg. Child II Sympozjum Chirurgiczno-Neonatologiczne. 2004:56–61. [in Polish]
    1. Kasznia-Brown J, Chilarski A. Współczesne poglądy na etiopatogenezę martwiczego zapalenia jelit. Przegl Pediatr. 2000;30:109–13. [in Polish]
    1. Thompson AM, Bizzarro MJ. Necrotizingenterocolitis in newborns: pathogenesis, prevention and management. Drugs. 2008;68(9):1227–38.
    1. Epelman M, Daneman A, Navarro OM, et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis: review of state-of-the-art imaging findings with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2007;27:285–305.
    1. Luig M, Lui K. Epidemiology of necrotizing enterocolitis – Part II: Risks and susceptibility of premature infants during the surfactant era: a regional study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2005;41(4):174–79.
    1. Buonomo C. The radiology of necrotizing enterocolitis. Radiol Clin North Am. 1999;37:1187–98.
    1. Yost CC. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: diagnosis, management, and pathogenesis. Infus Nurs. 2005;28(2):130–34.
    1. McElhinney DB, Hedrick HL, Bush DM, et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates with congenital heart disease: risk factors and outcomes. Pediatrics. 2000;106:1080–87.
    1. Pinheiro JM, Clark DA, Benjamin KG. A critical analysis of the routine testing of newborn stools for occult blood and reducing substanes. Adv Neonatal Care. 2003;3:133–38.
    1. Silva CT, Danemann A, Navarro OM, et al. Correlation of sonographic findings and outcome in necrotizing enterocolitis. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:274–82.
    1. Bohnhorst B. Usefulness of abdominal ultrasound in diagnosing necrotising enterocolitis. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2013;98(5):445–50.
    1. Muchantef K, Epelman M, Darge K, et al. Sonographic and radiographic imaging features of the neonate with necrotizing enterocolitis: correlating findings with outcomes. Pediatr Radiol. 2013;43(11):1444–52.
    1. Bütter A, Flageole H, Laberge JM. The changing face of surgical indications for necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2002;37:496–99.
    1. Fanaroff A, Hack M, Walsh M. The NICHD neonatal research network: changes in practice and outcomes during the first 15 years. Semin Perinatol. 2003;27:281–87.
    1. Guner YS, Chokshi N, Petrosyan M, et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis – bench to bedside: novel and emerging strategies. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2008;17:255–65.
    1. Neu J. Neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis: an update. Acta Paediatr. 2005;94(Suppl 449):100–5.
    1. Faingold R, Daneman A, Tomlinson G, et al. Necrotizing enterocolitis: assessment of bowel viability with color Doppler US. Radiology. 2005;235:587–94.
    1. Neu J. Gastrointestinal development and meeting the nutritional needs of premature infants. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85(2):629S–34S.
    1. Holland AJ, Shun A, Martin HC, et al. Small bowel perforation in the premature neonate: congenital or acquired. Pediatr Surg Int. 2003;19(6):489–94.
    1. Calisti A, Perrelli L, Nanni L, et al. Surgical approach to neonatal intestinal perforation. An analysis on 85 cases (1991–2001) Minerva Pediatr. 2004;56(3):335–39.
    1. Cass DL, Brandt ML, Patel DL, et al. Peritoneal drainage as definitive treatment for neonates with isolated intestinal perforation. J Pediatr Surg. 2000;35(11):1531–36.
    1. Gollin G, Abarbanell A, Baerg JE. Peritoneal drainage as definitive management of intestinal perforation in extremely low-birth-weight infants. J Pediatr Surg. 2003;38(12):1814–17.
    1. Moss RL, Dimmitt RA, Henry MC. A meta-analysis of peritoneal drainage versus laparotomy for perforated necrotizing enterocolitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2001;36(8):1210–13.

Source: PubMed

3
订阅