Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Combination With A-HAM in Refractory AML (GO-A-HAM)

August 11, 2010 updated by: University of Ulm

Phase II Study on Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin in Combination With All-trans-Retinoic Acid, High-dose Cytarabine and Mitoxantrone in Patients With Primary Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia

GO-A-HAM:

Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin 3g/m² day 1 Cytarabine 3g/m² bid days 1-3 Mitoxantrone 12mg/m² days 2,3 All-trans Retinoic acid 45mg/m² days 4-6 and 15 mg/m² days 7-28

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary refractory AML is associated with an extremely poor prognosis [1,2]. In the AMLHD93 trial conducted by the AMLSG ULM, patients refractory to the first induction therapy with ICE (idarubicin, cytarabine, etoposide) had an overall survival of 12% after 5 years [1]. All patients alive in this cohort had received allogeneic transplantation. Therefore, we assigned allogeneic transplantation in our consecutive trial, AMLHD98A, to all primary refractory patients [3]. However, the main problem in this patient group remains achieving a partial (PR) or complete (CR) remission to a salvage therapy. Additionally, the pre-transplant disease status is an important prognostic factor in most studies of allogeneic transplantation, regardless dose intensified or dose reduced conditioning regimens are used [4,5,6]. Since 1993, in all studies of the German-Austrian-AMLSG response-adapted treatment strategies had been used. Within the AMLHD93 trial, refractory patients were assigned to an intensified second induction regimen with S-HAM (age<55 years) [7] or HAM (age 55 to 60 years) [1], and in the AMLHD98A trial, with A-HAM [3]. The incorporation of all-trans-retinoic acid was based on in vitro data [8-13] and by our randomised AMLHD98B study for elderly AML-patients showing a benefit in primary response and survival for patients assigned to standard induction therapy in combination with ATRA [14].

To compare the different salvage therapy strategies, we performed an as-treated analysis in primary refractory patients of the different cohorts. Although refractory to the first induction therapy with ICE, nine patients received a second cycle ICE. The results summarized in table 1 showed an improved response rate (CR and PR) for patients treated with the A-HAM protocol and thus leading to a higher proportion of patients receiving an allogeneic transplantation. Survival analysis showed so far no difference between the 4 different groups. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is a humanized anti-CD33 conjugated to Calicheamicin. The efficacy and the toxicity profile has been evaluated in several studies, so far the substance is approved for the monotherapy in relapsed AML-patients in a dose of 9mg/m² q 14d [15]. However, used as a single agent the efficacy is limited and not durable. Therefore, several trials have evaluated GO in combination with conventional chemotherapy [16,17]. In the MRC study a dose of 6 mg/m² given once at day 1 was associated with an increased liver toxicity and therefore the study continues with a dose of 3 mg/m² once at day 1 of induction therapy [17]. In summary, the available data for combination therapy showed efficacy of GO in phase II trials. The dose limiting toxicity was defined in the MRC trial at 6 mg/m². Therefore we consider GO in combination with A-HAM for primary refractory adult AML patients. Because all primary refractory patients are candidates for an allogeneic transplantation special considerations have to be taken with respect to the development of VOD after allogeneic transplantation. One recent report suggests a substantial risk for VOD for patients receiving an allogeneic transplantation after a therapy with GO [18]. In this report the odds ratio for VOD after a therapy with GO within 3.5 months before allogeneic transplantation was 21.6 (95%-confidence interval 4.2-112.2%). However, this report is based on 62 patients and the dosage of GO used was 6mg/m² and 9mg/m². Therefore, holding in mind the risk of VOD after GO exposure and the extremely poor prognosis of primary refractory patients the treatment approach combining A-HAM with GO with a dose of 3mg/m² is justified.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

95

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Innsbruck, Austria, A-6020
        • Department of Hematology / Oncology, University Hospital of Innsbruck
      • Salzburg, Austria, A-5020
        • St. Johann Hospital, Clinical Center of Salzburg
      • Wien, Austria, A-1140
        • Medical Department III, Hanusch-Hospital
      • Augsburg, Germany, 86156
        • Medical Department II, Central Hospital of Augsburg
      • Bonn, Germany, 53127
        • Department of General Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Bonn
      • Essen, Germany, 45239
        • Department of Hematology and Oncology, Hospital Essen-Süd, Ev. Hospital of Essen-Werden
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 65929
        • Department of Internal Medicine III, City Hospital Frankfurt am Main - Höchst
      • Gießen, Germany, 35392
        • Medical Department IV, University Hospital of Gießen
      • Goch, Germany, 47574
        • Department of Internal Medicine, Wilhelm-Anton-Hospital gGmbH
      • Göttingen, Germany, 37075
        • Centre of Internal Medicine, University Hospital of Göttingen
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital Eppendorf
      • Hanau, Germany, 63450
        • Medical Department III, Clinical Center Hanau
      • Hannover, Germany, 30449
        • Medical Department III, Clinical Center Hannover-Siloah
      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
        • Department of Hematology, Hemostaseology and Oncology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
      • Homburg, Germany, 66421
        • Department of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital of Saarland
      • Karlsruhe, Germany, 76133
        • Medical Department II, City Hospital Karlsruhe gGmbH
      • Kiel, Germany, 24116
        • Medical Department II, University Hospital of Kiel
      • Lebach, Germany, 66822
        • Department of Internal Medicine / Hematology and Oncology, Caritas Hospital Lebach
      • Luedenscheid, Germany, 58515
        • Department of Hematology / Oncology, Clinical center of Lüdenscheid
      • Mainz, Germany, 55101
        • Department of Hematology and internal Oncology, University Hospital of Mainz
      • München, Germany, 81675
        • Medical Department III, Clinical Center rechts der Isar
      • Oldenburg, Germany, 26133
        • Department of Hematology and Oncology, Clinical Center of Oldenburg gGmbH
      • Saarbrucken, Germany, 66113
        • Department of Hematology and Oncology / Caritas Hospital St. Theresia
      • Stuttgart, Germany, 70174
        • Department of Oncology / Clinical Center of Stuttgart
      • Tübingen, Germany, 72076
        • Department of Internal Medicine II, University Hospital of Tübingen
      • Ulm, Germany, 89070
        • Department of Internal Medicine III, University of Ulm
      • Wuppertal, Germany, 42283
        • Medical Department I, Helios Hospital Wuppertal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute myeloid leukemia defined according the WHO classification not responding to first induction therapy
  • Age 18-60 years
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Acute promyelocytic leukemia
  • Uncontrolled infection
  • Transfusion-refractory thrombocytopenia
  • Pregnancy, breast-feeding, insufficient contraception
  • Organ insufficiency: kidneys, liver, lungs, heart
  • Severe neurological and psychiatrical interfering with informed consent
  • No consent for the registration, storage and processing of data concerning the characteristics of the AML and the individual course
  • Performance status > grad 2 according the WHO classification

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
CR-rate after therapy with GO-A-HAM
Time Frame: day 30
day 30

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
overall survival
Time Frame: two years
two years
kind, incidence, severity, temporal sequence and correlation of side effects of the study-drugs
Time Frame: 30 days
30 days
rate of veno occlusive disease (VOD) after allogene transplantation
Time Frame: 100 days after allogene transplantation
100 days after allogene transplantation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard F Schlenk, Dr. med., University of Ulm / Department of Internal Medicine III

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 31, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 2, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 12, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 11, 2010

Last Verified

August 1, 2010

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe