Compare Effectiveness of Eplerenone vs Atenolol in Reversing the Remodelling Resistance Arteries in Subjects With HT

April 14, 2008 updated by: Pfizer

A Double-Blind, Parallel Design Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Eplerenone Versus Atenolol in Reversing the Remodeling of Resistance Arteries in Subjects With Mild to Moderate Primary Hypertension

To investigate the impact of antihypertensive therapy with the selective mineralocorticoid receptor blocker, eplerenone, on small resistance artery remodeling, compared to the effect of equivalent blood pressure control achieved with a b-blocker, atenolol.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

34

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2W 1R7
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pt with essential hypertension who have never been treated or untreated within the previous 6 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Malignant Hypertension
  • Sitting diastolic blood pressure > 115mmHg or sitting Systolic blood pressure > 200mmHg

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
The change from baseline to week 52 in the media/lumen ratio and the maximum % relaxation response to acetylcholine of gluteal subcutaneous resistance vessels, measured from the gluteal biopsy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Will be done for both the Intent to Treat and per protocol populations, and use both the LOCF and OC methods

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2003

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 2, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 7, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 15, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 14, 2008

Last Verified

May 1, 2007

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe