Efficacy and Safety of Early Versus Delayed Administration of Everolimus in de Novo Renal Transplant Patients

March 30, 2011 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

A National Multicentre Randomized Study Comparing the Early Versus Delayed Administration of Everolimus in de Novo Kidney Transplant Recipients at Risk of Delayed Graft Function

The purpose of this study is to evaluate if the delayed administration of everolimus could reduce the everolimus associated "anti-proliferative complications" (e.g. wound healing disorder) while maintaining efficacy, when compared to the immediate administration of everolimus in de novo renal transplant patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

139

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Recipients of cadaveric kidney transplants
  • Patients at risk of DGF defined as one or more of the following:

    • Donor age > 55 years
    • Cold ischemic time (CIT) ≥ 24 hours but < 40 hours
    • Second or subsequent renal transplantation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have received an investigational drug within 4 weeks of baseline period
  • Patients who are recipients of multiple organ transplants, including more than one kidney, or previous transplant with any organ other than kidney
  • Patients with body mass index (BMI) > 32 kg/m2

Other protocol-defined exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Immediate Everolimus
Patients received Everolimus starting within 48 hours of kidney transplant through to the end of the study, administered orally twice a day. Dose was adjusted in order to maintain a trough level between 3-8 ng/mL.
Experimental: Delayed Everolimus
Patients received Everolimus 4 weeks after kidney transplant until the end of the study, administered orally twice a day. The dose was adjusted in order to maintain a trough level between 3-8 ng/mL. Patients received mycophenolic acid until everolimus was initiated.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Considered in Failure for the Primary Failure Endpoint at 3 Months
Time Frame: Month 3
"In Failure", is at least one of these events occurred within the first 3 months: delayed graft function(DGF), (need for dialysis within the first 7 days,minus day one,post-transplantation); Biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), Graft loss, (allograft was presumed lost on the day the patient started and not removable from dialysis). Death; Loss to follow-up; Wound healing disorder(Any wound related to the kidney transplantation being opened beyond 3 weeks, or infected, or drained fluid or herniated was considered not healed).
Month 3

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Considered in Failure for the Primary Failure Endpoint at 6 Months Post-transplantation.
Time Frame: at 6 Month post-transplantation

The primary efficacy variable was the "primary failure endpoint" at 6 months defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following events within the first 6 months:

  • delayed graft function (DGF), defined as the need for dialysis within the first 7 days post-transplantation excluding the first day post-transplantation
  • efficacy failure (biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up)
  • wound healing disorder related to initial transplant surgery
at 6 Month post-transplantation
Number of Participants Considered in Failure for the Primary Failure Endpoint at 12 Months Post-transplantation.
Time Frame: at 12 Month post-transplantation

The primary efficacy variable was the "primary failure endpoint" at 12 months defined as the occurrence of one or more of the following events within the first 12 months:

  • delayed graft function (DGF), defined as the need for dialysis within the first 7 days post-transplantation excluding the first day post-transplantation
  • efficacy failure (biopsy proven acute rejection (BPAR), graft loss, death or loss to follow-up)
  • wound healing disorder related to initial transplant surgery
at 12 Month post-transplantation
Number of Participants Who Underwent Any Dialysis Within the 12-month Treatment Period
Time Frame: Month 12
The number of patients who underwent any dialysis within the 12-month treatment period.
Month 12
Duration of Dialysis
Time Frame: 12 months
The mean duration in days of any dialysis session that occurred within the 12 month treatment period.
12 months
Number of Participants With Any Wound Healing Disorder During the 12-month Treatment Period
Time Frame: Month 12
A wound was considered healed if all the suture material and staples were removed and the wound was intact by 3 weeks. Any wound opened beyond this point, infected, drained fluid or herniated was considered not healed.
Month 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 8, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 12, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 4, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2011

Last Verified

March 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe