Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With Simdax® Versus Dobutrex® in Decompensated Heart Failure Patients.

March 17, 2017 updated by: Orion Corporation, Orion Pharma

Efficacy and Safety of Short-term Intravenous Treatment With Simdax® Versus Dobutrex® in Decompensated Heart Failure Patients Treated With Beta-receptor Blocking Agents.

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of levosimendan with dobutamine on heart function in patients suffering of severe chronic heart failure.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Patients with decompensate heart failure (NYHA III-IV) and in need of intravenous inotrop support and who fulfil all inclusion and no exclusion criteria will be randomised into the study in proportion 1:1. Although stratification will be done so patients treated with beta-receptor blocker carvedilol will be divided the same between the study groups.

All patients will receive infusions in parallell, one of the groups will receive active product (levosimendan or dobutamine) and the other will receive placebo (double-dummy technique).

Catheterisation for measurement of hemodynamic parameters will be performed according to routine methods at the clinic. The measurements of the hemodynamic variables will start 30 minutes before start of study drug infusion and will be finished 48 hours after start of infusion. The most important variables during the measurements is Cardiac Index (CI)and Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP).

Parallel registration will be done on ECG, blood pressure, blood frequency, central venous pressure, and lung artery pressure. Heart failure and other clinical symptoms will be registered continuously during 48 hours. Blood samples will be taken intermittent to record the blood values. Cogent rules for decreasing/increasing of the dose can be found in the study protocol, likewise rules for interruption or stoop for infusion.

Registration of side-effects will be done continuously. The recommendation for treatment for known side effects could be found in the protocol (section 5.3.4) and the protocol should be available during the study procedure.

One month after the study the patients will be followed up with a very careful examination and also of the amount of visits and reason for visits to hospital during the past 30-35 days.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

60

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gothenburg, Sweden, 413 45
        • Cardiology Department, Sahlgrenska University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Main Inclusion Criteria:

  • Decompensated chronic heart failure of ischemic or non-ischemic origin, in NYHA class III to IV, despite optimised conventional treatment and who may benefit from intravenous positive inotropic agents as per the investigator's judgment.
  • Ongoing treatment with a beta-receptor blocking agent in a stable regimen for at least 3 months and at an optimal dose as per the investigator's judgment.
  • Left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) less than or similar to 35%.
  • CI < 2.5 l/min/m2.
  • Mean PCWP >15 mmHg.

Main Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant mechanical obstruction affecting ventricular filling and/or outflow.
  • Systolic blood pressure 85 mmHg or less at screening and/or baseline.
  • Heart rate 130 bpm or greater, persistent for at least 5 minutes at screening and/or baseline.
  • Severe angina pectoris during the 6 hours before screening and/or baseline.
  • Deterioration of chronic heart failure due to an acute myocardial infarction within 5 days before screening measurements.
  • Administration of Simdax within 1 month before baseline.
  • A history of Torsades de Pointes.
  • Evidence of severe renal insufficiency (serum creatinine > 450 μmol/l or on dialysis) at screening.
  • Significant hepatic impairment or elevation of liver enzymes to 5 times the upper limit of normal range of the analysing laboratory at screening.
  • Acute bleeding or severe anaemia.
  • Heart surgery within 3 months before baseline.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Compare the hemodynamic parameters Cardiac Index (CI) and Pulmonary Capillary Wedge Pressure (PCWP) from baseline to 24 hours, between the two groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Compare the efficacy and safety between the treatment groups, with regard to:
• Changes in hemodynamic parameters from baseline to 24 and 48 hours.
• Change in study subject's and investigator's assessment of symptoms of heart failure at 48 hours and 1-month follow-up.
• Change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) classat 48 hours and 1-month follow-up.
• Ability to continue treatment with β-receptor blocking agents.
• Days alive and out of hospital during the 1-month follow-up period.
• Change in B-type Natriuretic Polypeptide (BNP)at 24 and 48 hours and 1-month follow-up.
• Proportion of treatment discontinuations and/or need for rescue therapy due to lack of efficacy.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Claes-Håkan Bergh, Assoc Prof, Institution of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2002

Study Completion

April 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 14, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 21, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

September 22, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 17, 2017

Last Verified

September 1, 2005

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe