A Six-month Study to Compare Outcome Differences and Visceral Response ... Irritable Bowel Syndrome

November 23, 2016 updated by: University of California, Los Angeles

A Six-Month Study to Compare Outcome Differences and Visceral Response in Subjects Randomized to a Psychological Intervention for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

The purpose of this study is to assess the effect of participation in one of the following interventions: (1) IBS Stress Management; (2) IBS Symptom Management; or (3) IBS Educational Training on improving IBS associated symptoms. It is anticipated that this research will provide information on the usefulness of psychological approaches in treating IBS and will help scientists better understand the disorder.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

163

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Exclusion Criteria:

  • GI pathology (organic disease) that affects bowel transit
  • Co-morbid pain disorders
  • Current or recent history (within 24 months) of drug or alcohol abuse
  • Clinical evidence (including physical exam, laboratory tests) of significant medical disease that may interfere with the patient successfully completing the trial
  • Planned use of drugs or agents that affect GI motility and/or perception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
IBS Stress Management
If randomly assigned to this intervention, the session with the therapist will consist of training about IBS symptoms and their relationship to stress, as well as skills training in relaxation and ways of identifying and challenging mistaken thoughts about life events. The goal of this treatment is to lessen mental and physical stressful reactions to daily events, and therefore lessen IBS symptoms as a reaction to stress. The patient will be encouraged to apply relaxation skills to stressful situations.
Active Comparator: 2
IBS Symptom Management
If assigned to this group, the therapist will discuss feelings, over-attention to IBS symptoms, and your fear of IBS symptoms. Patients will learn how to identify thoughts that may increase your IBS symptoms and will practice how to change these thoughts to ones that make them feel more comfortable. The sessions will focus on reactions to daily life that in turn result in IBS Symptoms.
Active Comparator: 3
IBS Educational Training
Those assigned to this group will be given educational materials about IBS and will discuss the reading material with the therapist. The reading topics include information on gut disorders, anatomy and physiology of the gut, assessment procedures, and how to manage IBS symptoms. Sessions will also consist of weekly reviews of daily records and IBS symptoms. The goal of this intervention is to provide educational training about IBS.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Changes in Symptoms
Time Frame: 14 days
14 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
IBS-specific Quality of Life increase
Time Frame: 14 days
14 days
IBS-Specific Beliefs and Coping
Time Frame: 14 days
14 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bruce D Naliboff, PhD, University of California Los Angeles, West Los Angeles VA Healthcare System
  • Principal Investigator: Michelle G Craske, PhD, University of California, Los Angeles

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

August 25, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 28, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2016

Last Verified

November 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe