- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00404677
The Correlation Between Airway Inflammation and Loss of Deep Inhalation Bronchoprotection in Asthmatics
January 18, 2008 updated by: University of Saskatchewan
The loss of deep inhalation bronchoprotection in asthmatic individuals has been shown to be related to the degree of airway hyperresponsiveness, a hallmark of asthma.
In several studies, asthmatic individuals with mild airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) (methacholine PC20 > 2 mg/mL) had a difference in methacholine PC20 with and without deep inhalations that averaged 1.8 doubling methacholine concentrations (p=0.0003).
Conversely, asthmatic individuals with moderate to severe AHR (methacholine PC20 ≤ 2 mg/mL) had a non-significant difference in methacholine PC20 with and without deep inhalations (p=0.09).
This loss of deep inhalation bronchoprotection is also now believed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of asthma.
Airway inflammation is another of the key features of asthma and information on airway inflammation is increasingly being used in the diagnosis and treatment of asthma.
The level of airway inflammation (as measured by fraction of exhaled nitric oxide and sputum eosinophilia) has also been shown to be correlated to the level of airway hyperresponsiveness (as measured by methacholine PC20).
In addition, glucocorticoids have been shown to decrease airway hyperresponsiveness, further suggesting that these two phenomena, airway inflammation and airway hyperresponsiveness, are related.
We therefore suggest that the degree of airway inflammation is related to the loss of deep inhalation bronchoprotection and expect there to be a negative correlation between the degree of deep inhalation bronchoprotection and airway inflammation.
Study Overview
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
18
Phase
- Not Applicable
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- diagnosis of asthma
Exclusion Criteria:
- other lung disease(s)
- smoking
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Standard
Methacholine challenges are performed using the standardized two minute tidal breathing method
|
deep inhalation is comprised of an inhalation manoeuver from FRC to TLC
|
|
Active Comparator: Modified
Five deep inhalation maneouvers are incorporated into the standardized methacholine challenge
|
deep inhalation is comprised of an inhalation manoeuver from FRC to TLC
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
fraction of exhaled nitric oxide, sputum eosinophils and methacholine PC20
Time Frame: freaction of exhaled nitric oxide data collected prior to methacholine challenges; sputum collected after the first methacholine challenge
|
freaction of exhaled nitric oxide data collected prior to methacholine challenges; sputum collected after the first methacholine challenge
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Donald Cockcroft, MD, FRCP(C), Department of Medicine, Division of Respirology, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Saskatchewan
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
June 1, 2006
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2007
Study Completion (Actual)
February 1, 2007
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
November 27, 2006
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
November 27, 2006
First Posted (Estimate)
November 29, 2006
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
January 23, 2008
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 18, 2008
Last Verified
January 1, 2008
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- BIO-REB 06-92
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.