In-exsufflator Cough Assist Device in Patients With Symptomatic Bronchiectasis

A Randomized, Controlled Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of the Inexsufflator Cough Assist Device in Patients With Symptomatic Bronchiectasis

This study is a randomized, controlled trial examining the effectiveness of the mechanical cough-assist device (in-exsufflator) in promoting the clearance of retained airway secretions in patients with symptomatic bronchiectasis. We hypothesize that this enhanced clearance of airway secretions will lead to a decline in the number of acute exacerbations of bronchiectasis experienced by these patients during the study period, improve health-related quality of life, decrease overall health-care costs and improve pulmonary function.

Study Overview

• Status: Terminated
• Conditions: Bronchiectasis
• Intervention / Treatment: Device: In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device; Device: Active Comparator: Flutter Valve Device

Detailed Description

Bronchiectasis is characterized by airway dilatation with the potential to cause devastating illness, including repeated respiratory infections requiring antibiotics, disabling productive, mucopurulent cough, shortness of breath and occasional hemoptysis. The damaged and dilated airways lead to persisting bacterial infection of the bronchi and bronchioles, causing inflammation and retained secretions, which in turn may further damage the airways. Patients typically suffer from frequent, severe and refractory episodes of bacterial bronchitis, often requiring hospitalization and prolonged courses of antibiotics. The pathophysiology of bronchiectasis involves the retention of viscid, tenacious inflammatory secretions and microbes leading to a "vicious cycle" of airway obstruction, destruction and recurrent infection with further compromise of the mucociliary clearance host defense apparatus. It has been widely proposed and recommended that methods of enhancing clearance of airway secretions should be an integral component of the care of patients with bronchiectasis. Despite these recommendations and a sound pathophysiologic plausibility given the central role retention of secretions plays in the disease, the effectiveness of interventions targeted toward enhancing bronchopulmonary hygiene has not been systematically studied. It is also not known whether the ability to generate an adequate cough would predict which patient will benefit from these interventions.

The mechanical in-exsufflator device assists patients in clearing retained secretions by augmenting the expiratory flow and force of the patient's cough with the addition of a cycle of positive and negative inspiratory pressure. An effective cough mechanism is actually an important and beneficial host defense which aids in mucus clearance along with the mucociliary apparatus. We hypothesize that daily, regular use of the in-exsufflator device will lead to a reduction in acute bronchiectasis exacerbations- a clinically meaningful endpoint- with other possible beneficial outcomes including improved pulmonary function, improved health-related quality of life and decreased health care costs.

Despite the lack of rigorous, well-designed studies supporting the role and most effective mode of bronchial hygiene physiotherapy in patients with bronchiectasis, many Pulmonologists recommend the flutter valve device as the generally accepted "standard of care" at this time due to its relative non-invasiveness, ease of use and high level of patient acceptability. The flutter valve is a simple, hand-held, pipe-like device which helps loosen secretions by providing an expiratory low-pressure vibratory pulse to the patient's airway when used. This study will provide a comparison of the clinical efficacy of these mechanical chest physiotherapy devices in the setting of bronchiectasis.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 28
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• United States
  • Massachusetts
    • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01605
      • UMass Memorial Medical Center, Universty Campus
    • Worcester, Massachusetts, United States, 01608
      • St. Vincent Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Chest CT scan confirmation of bronchiectasis
• At least two exacerbations in the preceding 12 months requiring antibiotics

Exclusion Criteria:

• Cystic fibrosis
• Bullous emphysema
• History of spontaneous pneumothorax
• History of massive hemoptysis: greater than 200 cc in a 24 hour period
• Lung resection surgery in the past 6 months
• Use of the mechanical cough in-exsufflator in the prior 3 months
• Inability to speak and read English
• Inability to demonstrate proper use of the cough-assist or flutter device
• Unable to provide informed consent

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Treatment
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: None (Open Label)

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Assignment to In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device; In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device augments the expiratory flow and force of the patient's cough with the addition of a cycle of positive and negative inspiratory pressure when used daily	Device: In-Exsufflator Cough Assist Device
Active Comparator: Assignment to flutter valve device; flutter valve device delivers expiratory low-pressure vibratory pulse to the patient's airway when used daily	Device: Active Comparator: Flutter Valve Device; Active Comparator

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Number of Suppurative Exacerbations Per Patient Per Year	The impact of the intervention is measured by the total number of suppurative exacerbations per patient within a 12 month period.	12 months
Number of Hospitalizations and Urgent/Unscheduled Outpatient Visits	The impact of the intervention is measured by the number of hospitalizations and urgent/unscheduled outpatient visits the participants experienced within a 12 month period.	12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Quality of Life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire)	Quality of life is measured using St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire, a 50 item disease-specific instrument designed to measure impact on overall health, daily life and perceived well-being in patients with obstructive airways disease. The instrument consists of 2 parts, and 3 components. Part 1 measures symptom frequency and severity with a 1,3 or 12 month recall. Part 1 is evaluated using several scales. Part 2 measures impact of breathlessness on activities including social functioning and psychological disturbances. Part 2 is evaluated by dichotomous (true false) evaluation except the final question which is a 4 point likert scale. Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher score indicating more limitation and lower quality of life.	12 months
Quality of Life (Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire)	Quality of life is measured using the Cough Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (CQLQ) to measure the effect of interventions on cough-specific quality of life. The Cough-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire consist of 28 questions about cough and its effects using Likert-like 4-point scales, with lower scores indicating less effect of cough on health related quality of life. CQLQ scale ranges from 28 to 112 with higher scores indicating worse outcome or status.	12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: University of Massachusetts, Worcester
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Stephen J Krinzman, MD, University of Massachusetts, Worcester

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start: April 1, 2004
• Primary Completion (Actual): May 1, 2008
• Study Completion (Actual): May 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: March 22, 2007
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: March 22, 2007
• First Posted (Estimate): March 26, 2007

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): September 18, 2018
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 20, 2018
• Last Verified: August 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Bronchiectasis
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Respiratory Tract Diseases; Bronchial Diseases; Bronchiectasis
• Other Study ID Numbers: H-11138

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: Yes
• product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.: Yes