Randomized Controlled Trial of Hyperbaric Oxygen in Patients Who Have Taken Bisphosphonates

February 19, 2013 updated by: Duke University
Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has recently been recognized as associated with bisphosphonate therapy, however there is little information on the natural history, treatment or prevention strategies for this condition. The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen as a treatment. We will randomize 35 out of 70 ONJ patients to receive HBO in addition to their routine oral surgery care and follow both groups over a 2-year period.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) has recently been recognized as associated with bisphosphonate (BP) therapy, however there is little information on the natural history, treatment or prevention strategies for this condition1. Bisphosphonates, particularly compounds containing an aliphatic chain with an amino group in the R2 position, (pamidronate, alendronate and zoledronate) are extremely effective and widely used in the treatment of breast cancer, prostate cancer, multiple myeloma and non-malignant bone disease. Although ONJ appears to develop in less than one percent of patients taking these drugs, the seriousness of the disease plus the current lack of treatment options makes this a very difficult clinical problem This study will randomize 35 out of 70 patients to receive HBO in addition to their routine oral surgery therapy for ONJ and follow both groups over a 2-year period. The study design is an interventional, prospective, randomized trial with a 2-year follow up period. Seventy subjects meeting the inclusion criteria for ONJ will be recruited by participating physicians and randomized to receive 40 HBO treatments over a 4 week period or to continue their normal oral care. No subject, HBO treated or not, will be asked to change, initiate or discontinue any ongoing therapies they may be receiving from their primary care giver for ONJ or any other medical condition. The analysis will compare remission rates between the two groups while controlling for age, gender, race, previous local trauma or surgery, tumor type, diabetes, immunosuppression, bisphosphonate duration, indication (hypercalcemia), infection, corticosteroids, and thalidomide and dental hygiene. All subjects will be closely followed throughout the 24 month course of the study with weekly contacts by phone or email to log jaw pain level as well as to record any change in general medical condition. The 17 question Duke Health Profile will be used to measure quality of life indicators at 4 key points during the study.

Comparison(s): 1) clinical remission rate in patients receiving and not receiving HBO. 2) Bone turnover and molecular measures of osteoclast signaling in ONJ patients before and after HBO and relative to non-diseased controls (labs from non-diseased controls to be obtained from a companion study).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

54

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • North Carolina
      • Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27710
        • Duke University Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Able to consent
  • Meets definition of ONJ
  • Has taken amino-bisphosphonates

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to consent
  • Ineligible for HBO
  • Taking protease inhibitors for HIV
  • Any past history of radiation to head or neck
  • Life expectancy less than 12 months
  • Tobacco use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HBO
Subject receives 40 HBO sessions at 2 atmospheres of pressure over 4 weeks
40 sessions of 100% oxygen at 2 atmospheres of pressure for 2 hours each
Active Comparator: Control
non-HBO comparison group
no change from routine care, no HBO

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical outcome assessments. Effect of HBO as an adjunct to the routine treatment of ONJ will be evaluated by physical exam and pain scores
Time Frame: Weekly for pain score. All others at: 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months
Weekly for pain score. All others at: 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of life measurements by the Duke Health Profile
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
3 months, 6 months, 12 months and 18 months
Laboratory measures of bone turnover
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months 12 months and 18 months
3 months, 6 months 12 months and 18 months
Molecular indicators of osteoclast activation (RANK, RANKL, OPG, pAKt)
Time Frame: 3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months
3 months 6 months 12 months 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Freiberger, MD, Duke University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

April 18, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 21, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 19, 2013

Last Verified

February 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe