Sublingual Misoprostol Versus Standard Surgical Care for the Treatment of Incomplete Abortion

March 28, 2012 updated by: Gynuity Health Projects
In this study, we will compare the safety and efficacy of 400 mcg sublingually administered misoprostol alone to standard surgical care for the treatment of incomplete abortion. This study will provide important data on the role of misoprostol in health services offering an array of treatments for incomplete abortion. Women could significantly benefit from a non-invasive treatment option for incomplete abortion. While safe surgical services are becoming more widespread, there is still a serious risk of complications from these procedures. Especially in developing countries, infection, hemorrhage and uterine damage are still too common. Medical treatment of incomplete abortion using misoprostol would be a tremendous step to reducing morbidity and mortality due to abortion complications.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dande/Ziniare, Burkina Faso
        • Dandé District Hospital/Ziniaré District Hospital
      • Cairo, Egypt
        • El-Galaa Teaching Hospital
      • Shatby, Alexandria, Egypt
        • Shatby Maternity Hospital/Alexandria University
      • Nouakchott, Mauritania
        • Cheikh Zayed Hospital
      • Niamey, Niger
        • Maternite Issaka Gazobi
      • Guediawaye, Senegal
        • Centre de Sante Le Roi Baudouin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Uterine size no larger than 12 weeks LMP at time of presentation for care.
  • Past or present history of vaginal bleeding during pregnancy.
  • Open cervical os.
  • If ultrasound used evidence of incomplete abortion with substantial debris in the uterus.
  • All women would have been advised to have surgical evacuation of the uterus if misoprostol was not available.
  • General good health.
  • Willing to provide contact information for purposes of follow-up.
  • Also in Egypt: 21 years of age or over or parental permission (there is no minimum age requirement in Niger, Mauritania and Senegal).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to study drug
  • Signs of severe infection, defined as at least one of the following: 1) foul smelling discharge, 2) fever > 38 degrees C , 3) uterine tenderness
  • Hemodynamic disturbances (pulse >110/min and systolic bp <100)
  • Have an IUD in place; (the IUD may be removed making the woman eligible)
  • Suspected ectopic pregnancy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: surgery
standard surgical treatment (either dilation and curettage or manual vacuum aspiration)
standard surgical treatment (dilation and curettage or manual vacuum aspiration)
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: misoprostol
400 mcg misoprostol
single dose of 400 mcg misoprostol administered sublingually

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Complete abortion without recourse to surgical intervention.
Time Frame: follow up visit 7 days after initial treatment
follow up visit 7 days after initial treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

November 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 25, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 25, 2007

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

April 27, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

March 30, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 28, 2012

Last Verified

March 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Incomplete Abortion

Clinical Trials on surgery

3
Subscribe