Safety and Immunogenicity of Tdap Vaccine Compared to DTaP Vaccine in Children 4 to 6 Years of Age

January 10, 2014 updated by: Sanofi Pasteur, a Sanofi Company

Safety and Immunogenicity of Tdap Vaccine Compared to DTaP Vaccine as Fifth Dose Booster in Children 4 to 6 Years of Age

Currently, there is no 5-component acellular pertussis vaccine licensed for the 5th dose in US children aged 4 to 6 years.This study is aimed at providing evidence of sero-protection, booster response and safety of this formulation as a 5th dose.

Primary Objective:

- To compare the immune responses of Tetanus toxoid, reduced diphtheria toxoid, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) Vaccine to Diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP) vaccine (all antigens) when each is administered as a 5th dose and given concurrently, to children aged 4 to 6 years.

Secondary/Observational Objectives:

  • To compare the immune responses for pertussis antigens of Tdap Vaccine to DTaP vaccine (for pertussis antigens) when each is administered as a 5th dose and given concurrently, to children aged 4 to 6 years.
  • To present the long-term immunogenicity at 1-, 3-, and 5-years post-vaccination after each long-term follow-up.
  • To describe the safety profile following vaccine administration.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1045

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alberta
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2C8
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35205
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35244
    • Arkansas
      • Fayetteville, Arkansas, United States, 72703
      • Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States, 72401
      • Little Rock, Arkansas, United States, 72205
    • California
      • Fountain Valley, California, United States, 92708
      • Huntington Beach, California, United States, 92647
      • Oakland, California, United States, 94611
      • Roseville, California, United States, 95661
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95815
    • Connecticut
      • Norwich, Connecticut, United States, 06360
    • Georgia
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30062
      • Woodstock, Georgia, United States, 30189
    • Kentucky
      • Bardstown, Kentucky, United States, 40004
      • Crestview Hills, Kentucky, United States, 41017
      • Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40291
    • Louisiana
      • Bossier City, Louisiana, United States, 71111
    • Maryland
      • Frederick, Maryland, United States, 21702
    • Nebraska
      • Bellevue, Nebraska, United States, 68123
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68131
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68124
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68132
    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14618
    • North Dakota
      • Fargo, North Dakota, United States, 58103
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44121
    • Oregon
      • Gresham, Oregon, United States, 97030
    • Pennsylvania
      • Erie, Pennsylvania, United States, 16505
      • Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States, 19401
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15236
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15241
      • Rydal, Pennsylvania, United States, 19046
      • Uniontown, Pennsylvania, United States, 15401
    • Tennessee
      • Kingsport, Tennessee, United States, 37660
      • Tullahoma, Tennessee, United States, 37388
    • Texas
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78229
    • Utah
      • Layton, Utah, United States, 84041
      • Springville, Utah, United States, 84663
    • Virginia
      • Chesapeake, Virginia, United States, 23321
      • Midlothian, Virginia, United States, 23113
    • Washington
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99202
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99218
    • Wisconsin
      • LaCrosse, Wisconsin, United States, 54601

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

3 months to 2 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria :

  • Healthy, as determined by medical history and physical examination.
  • Aged 4 to 6 (< 7) years at the time of study vaccination on Day 0.
  • Signed and dated informed consent form that has been approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) by the parent or legally authorized representative.
  • Signed and dated informed assent form from the subject if required by the IRB.
  • Able to attend scheduled visits at Visit 1 and Visit 2 and able to comply with all trial procedures. Subjects will be invited to participate in the long-term immunogenicity follow-up study but a commitment to participate in the long-term is not required as an inclusion criterion.
  • Documented vaccination history of 4 previous doses of DAPTACEL according to the recommended national immunization schedule for Diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis (DTaP).

Exclusion Criteria :

  • Participation in another clinical trial in the 4 weeks preceding the trial vaccination.
  • Planned participation in another clinical trial during the original trial period.
  • Congenital or acquired immunodeficiency, immunosuppressive therapy such as anti-cancer chemotherapy or radiation therapy within the preceding 6 months, or long-term systemic corticosteroids therapy.
  • Systemic hypersensitivity to any of the vaccine components or history of life-threatening reaction to the trial vaccine or a vaccine containing the same substances.
  • Chronic illness at a stage that could interfere with trial conduct or completion.
  • Blood or blood-derived products received in the past 3 months.
  • Receipt of any other vaccine within 30 days prior to study vaccination, or planning to receive another vaccine within 30 days before the Visit 2 blood draw (with the exception of the annual influenza vaccine).
  • History of diphtheria, tetanus or pertussis infection (confirmed either serologically or microbiologically).
  • Thrombocytopenia or bleeding disorder contraindicating intra muscular vaccination.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1
DAPTACEL primed participants
0.5 mL, IM
Other Names:
  • Adacel
Experimental: Group 2
Pentacel primed participants
0.5 mL, IM
Other Names:
  • DAPTACEL in the US
  • TRIPACEL in Canada

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Seroprotection at Baseline and 30 Days Post-vaccination for Diphtheria and Tetanus at ≥ 0.1 IU/mL Level
Time Frame: Pre-dose and 30 days post-vaccination

Seroprotection rate at level ≥ 0.1 IU/mL was defined as antibody concentrations ≥ 0.1 IU/mL.

Diphtheria titers were determined by toxin neutralization assay; tetanus titers were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Pre-dose and 30 days post-vaccination
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Serothreshold at Baseline and 30 Days Post-vaccination for Diphtheria and Tetanus at Level ≥ 1.0 IU/mL
Time Frame: Pre-dose and 30 days post-vaccination

Serothreshold rate at level ≥ 1.0 IU/mL was defined as antibody concentrations ≥ 1.0 IU/mL.

Diphtheria titers were determined by toxin neutralization assay; tetanus titers were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Pre-dose and 30 days post-vaccination
Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Booster Response at 30 Days Post-Vaccination for Pertussis
Time Frame: 30 Days post-vaccination

Booster response was defined as post titer ≥ 0.4 IU/mL and pre-titer < 0.1 IU/mL, or Post/Pre titer ≥ 4 increase and pre titer ≥ 0.1 IU/mL but < 2 IU/mL, or Post/Pre titer ≥ 2 increase and pre-titer ≥ 2 IU/mL

Post-vaccination titers for pertussis toxoid (PT), pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), pertussis pertactin (PRN), and pertussis Fimbriae types 2 and 3 (FIM), were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

30 Days post-vaccination
Percentage of Participants Who Demonstrated Booster Response at 30 Days Post-Vaccination for Diphtheria and Tetanus
Time Frame: 30 Days post-vaccination

Booster response was defined as post titer ≥ 0.4 IU/mL and pre titer < 0.1 IU/mL, or Post/Pre titer ≥ 4 increase and pre-titer ≥ 0.1 IU/mL but < 2 IU/mL, or Post/Pre titer ≥ 2 increase and pre-titer ≥ 2 IU/mL.

Post-vaccination titers for Diphtheria was determined by neutralization assay; tetanus titers was determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

30 Days post-vaccination
Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) at Baseline and 30 Days Post Vaccination for Pertussis
Time Frame: Pre-dose and 30 Days Post-vaccination
Pre- and post-vaccination GMTs and their 95% confidence intervals for pertussis toxoid (PT), pertussis filamentous hemagglutinin (FHA), pertussis pertactin (PRN), and pertussis Fimbriae types 2 and 3 (FIM), were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Pre-dose and 30 Days Post-vaccination

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Reporting at Least 1 Solicited Injection Site or Solicited Systemic Reaction Post-vaccination
Time Frame: Days 0 to 7 post-vaccination
Solicited Injection Site Reactions: Pain, erythema/redness, swelling, increased left limb circumference, and increased right limb circumference. Solicited Systemic Reactions: Fever (temperature), headache, malaise, and myalgia.
Days 0 to 7 post-vaccination

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 27, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

April 30, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

February 7, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2014

Last Verified

January 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe