Dysport® Injection in the Treatment of Chronic Lateral Epicondylitis (DCLE)

April 22, 2008 updated by: Tehran University of Medical Sciences
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a single injection of Dysport with a new protocol at forearm is effective in the management of chronic lateral epicondylitis.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Some studies valued the effectiveness of botulinum toxin. There is a great amount of controversy on the amount of botulinum toxin injected and the location of the injection. The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of botulinum toxin injection with placebo at a new injection site at the forearm in the treatment of chronic tennis elbow unrelieved by corticosteroid injection and physiotherapy. It is a double blind randomized controlled trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

52

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Pain: pain will be assessed as the physician touches lateral epicondyle or passively flexing the patient's wrist and while the patient extends his/her wrist or 3rd finger against resistance. Individuals who fulfill two or more of above will be considered to have lateral epicondylitis.
  • Symptom duration: should be at least 6 months.
  • Previous trial of complete course of physiotherapy and corticosteroid injection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Generalized polyarthritis
  • Local elbow arthritis
  • Simultaneous medial epicondylalgia
  • Bilateral lateral epicondylitis
  • Neurologic deficits (abnormal light touch sensation, deep tendon reflexes abnormality, radicular pain, radial nerve entrapment, signs of nerve root compression, decreased muscle force, multiple sclerosis, seizures)
  • The use of corticosteroid in last 30 days
  • Simultaneous use of drugs other than acetaminophen or physical therapy in the course of study
  • Pregnancy
  • Breast-feeding
  • Previous hand surgery
  • Having a hobby or job that needs finger extension

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: A
Other Names:
  • Dysport
Placebo Comparator: B

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain score on VAS at maximal grip, at maximal pinch, and during previous month at rest
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Patients subjective feeling of improvement.
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months
Tenderness on lateral epicondyle
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months
Pain sensation on resisted wrist extension, and passive wrist flexion
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months
Pain-free grip strength, and pinch strength
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months
Maximal grip strength, and pinch strength
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Seyed Mohammad J Mortazavi, M.D., Tehran University of Medical Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 6, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

July 9, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 23, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2008

Last Verified

April 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe