Study of the Effects of Motivational Enhancement Therapy on Alcohol Use in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients

November 26, 2014 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Motivating Chronic Hepatitis C Patients to Reduce Alcohol Use

The purpose of this study is to determine whether motivational enhancement therapy (MET) reduces alcohol use in a population of HCV-infected veterans who are currently drinking alcohol and have alcohol disorders. We hypothesize that veterans with HCV, an alcohol use disorder and continued excessive alcohol use who receive MET will have a greater reduction in the number of standard alcohol drinks per week and a greater percentage of days abstinent than veterans who receive health education control intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND: Recent studies suggest the presence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) among veterans treated within the Veterans Affairs Medical Center is 3 to 4 times more common than among the general population and approximately 50 to 60% of the patients are at risk for progression to end-stage liver disease. Alcohol use substantially increases the rate of liver disease progression. Alcohol treatment based on motivational principles has been found to be effective in alcohol treatment seeking individuals with low levels of psychiatric comorbidity. Effective treatments for alcohol use have not been studied in patients chronically infected with HCV, individuals who typically do not seek separate specialty care for alcohol problems. The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of motivational enhancement therapy (MET) in reducing alcohol use in a population of HCV-infected veterans who are currently drinking alcohol and have alcohol disorders. Secondarily this study is designed to determine whether changes in motivation predict changes in alcohol use; determine whether MET effects non-alcohol related behavior such as adherence to clinic appointments and the effects of a reduction in alcohol use on biomarkers of alcohol use and HCV viral load.

METHODS: Two sites of the national VA Hepatitis C Resource Center, including Minneapolis and Portland will enroll 136 men, women, and minority veterans who are HCV positive, have an alcohol use disorder and are currently drinking. Participants will be recruited from the hepatitis clinics at each site after they have received two sessions of care from hepatitis clinicians. Subjects will be eligible for enrollment in the study if they are drinking at least 7 drinks per week over the preceding 2-weeks. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: a 4-week session MET or a 4 session health education control intervention. Follow-up data will be collected at 3 and 6 month interviews by a blinded interviewer assessing current alcohol use. Secondary outcomes including stage of change, data regarding enrollment and attendance in separate substance abuse treatment or self-help programs (Alcoholics Anonymous) will be collected from participants' medical record. HCV viral titers will be obtained at baseline and 6-months. Percent CDT and ethyl glucuronide will be measured to confirm self-reported alcohol use at each study visit. The primary outcome (efficacy of MET in reducing alcohol use) data will be analyzed using mixed effect models if the data are normally distributed and generalized estimated equations if the data are non-normally distributed.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study focuses on a current VHA priority: treatment of veterans with HCV. Alcohol use on this population is a major risk factor for progression of liver disease. We anticipate that the MET proposed in this study will result in a slowing of the progression of liver disease, improvement in physical health, and a reduction in long-term service utilization and mortality rates.

POTENTIAL IMPACT ON VETERANS HEALTH CARE: Effectively addressing alcohol use disorders in a hepatitis clinic will contribute to a new standard of care for HCV patients within VA. MET is a relatively brief, easily adaptable intervention that if effective is likely to improve access to alcohol treatment, acceptance by patients and improve clinical efficiency. In addition, reducing or eliminating alcohol use in this population has the potential to alter the course of liver disease progression, reducing the rates of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and the need for liver transplantation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

139

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55417
        • Minneapolis VA Health Care System
    • Oregon
      • Portland, Oregon, United States, 97201
        • VA Medical Center, Portland

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or Female age 18 or older
  • Serum antibody and polymerase chain reaction positive for hepatitis C
  • Drinking greater than 7 drinks for each of the proceeding 2 weeks or one day heavy drinking day per week for 2 week (heavy drinking day:>4 drinks in one day)
  • Diagnosed with alcohol abuse or dependence

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of cocaine, methamphetamine or opioid dependence within the past 6 months
  • Unable to attend clinic appointments
  • Any known pre-existing medical conditions that could interfere with participation in the protocol, such as: CNS trauma, known cognitive impairment, dementia, encephalopathy from liver disease, acute psychiatric instability, such as significant psychosis, mania, or elevated risk for suicide

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Motivational Enhancement Therapy
Motivational enhancement therapy
MET is a 4 session intervention based on motivational approaches that was successful in project MATCH.
Active Comparator: Health Education
health education intervention
Health education intervention will serve as the active control. The intervention will consist of 4 sessions of health education with a focus on sleep hygiene, nutrition, exercise and relaxation training.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Number of Alcohol Drinks Per Week (as Measured by the Time Line Follow Back Procedure) at the 6 Month Follow-up.
Time Frame: 6-months
A standard drink was considered 14 oz. of alcohol or12 oz of regular beer, 5 oz of regular wine, or 1.5 oz of distilled spirits. The number of drinks per week was measured for 30 a day time frame at baseline, 3 months and 6-months.
6-months
Percent Days Abstinent From Alcohol at 6 Months
Time Frame: 6-months
Alcohol use was measured for 30 days at baseline, 3-months and 6-months using the time-line follow back method. Percent days abstinent was measured by determining: days abstinent/30days X 100=%days abstinent.
6-months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heavy Drinking Days (Greater or Equal to 4 Drinks)
Time Frame: 6-months
This was measured as heavy drinking days per 30 day time frame. A standard drink was considered 14 oz. of alcohol or12 oz of regular beer, 5 oz of regular wine, or 1.5 oz of distilled spirits. A heavy drinking day was considered to be 4 or greater drinks during a day.
6-months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Eric W. Dieperink, MD, Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 8, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

January 17, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 28, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 26, 2014

Last Verified

November 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe