An Open, Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Followed by Oral Azithromycin Versus Cefuroxime Alone or With Oral Erythromycin for the Treatment of Chinese Patients Who Were Hospitalized for Pneumonia

March 27, 2008 updated by: Pfizer

An Open, Prospective, Randomized, Multi-Center Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Followed by Oral Azithromycin vs. Cefuroxime Monotherapy or Plus Oral Erythromycin for the Treatment of Chinese Hospitalized Patients With Community- Acquired Pneumonia

To validate the efficacy and safety of azithromycin for the treatment of Chinese patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), compared with cefuroxime or the combination of cefuroxime plus oral erythromycin.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

139

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100853
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200025
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200003
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200040
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Shanghai, China, 200080
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of community acquired pneumonia (CAP) as defined by the presence of new infiltrate(s) including manifestation of consolidation, patchy, diffuse or interstitial inflammation on chest X-ray with or without pleural effusion plus at least 1 of the following: new cough and expectoration or progression of respiratory symptoms with purulent sputum with or without chest pain; fever; auscultatory findings such as rales or evidence of pulmonary consolidation; blood leukocyte count >10×109/L or <4×109/L with or without >15% bands or a blood leukocyte count between 4 and 10 with neutropils greater than or equal to 75%

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with hospital acquired pneumonia, aspiration pneumonia, severe pneumonia, history of post-obstructive pneumonia, active tuberculosis or bronchitis, bronchiectasis or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease without evidence of acute infection were not eligible for this study
  • Patients treated with any systemic antibiotic within 72 hours prior to study entry were not eligible unless the medication was, in the opinion of the investigators, classified as having failed

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Arm 2
intravenous azithromycin 500 mg once daily for 4 +/-1 days, followed by oral azithromycin 500 mg once daily for a total duration of 9 +/-1 days
Active Comparator: Arm 1
intravenous cefuroxime 1.5 g twice daily for 4 +/-1 days, followed by oral cefuroxime 0.5 g twice daily for a total duration of 9 +/-1 days plus erythromycin ethylsuccinate 0.5 g twice daily, which was given for a total duration of 14 days for subjects with suspected pneumonia due to atypical pathogens
Active Comparator: Arm 3
intravenous cefuroxime 1.5 g twice daily for 4 +/-1 days, followed by oral cefuroxime 0.5 g twice daily for a total duration of 9 +/-1 days

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
clinical efficacy (cure or marked improvement)
Time Frame: Visit 3 (Day 9 +-1 of treatment)
Visit 3 (Day 9 +-1 of treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
bacteriological efficacy (eradication)
Time Frame: Visit 3
Visit 3
clinical efficacy
Time Frame: Visit 4 (8 +/-1 days after treatment)
Visit 4 (8 +/-1 days after treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2003

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2003

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 1, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 1, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2008

Last Verified

March 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe