Trial of Calcineurin Inhibitor-Sparing Immunosuppression Regimen in Pediatric Liver Transplantation

March 11, 2020 updated by: John Goss, Baylor College of Medicine

A Prospective Randomized Trial of Prednisone and Tacrolimus Versus Prednisone, Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate Mofetil in Pediatric Liver Transplantation

The objective of this study is to compare the effects of two liver transplant immunosuppression regimens on renal function. Patients receiving the standard combination of prednisone and high-dose tacrolimus, a drug with known nephrotoxicity (Arm A) will be compared to patients receiving prednisone, low-dose tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arm B). MMF is an immunosuppression agent that has no associated nephrotoxicity. The primary end point of the study will be renal function as measured by glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Thirty pediatric liver transplant recipients will be randomized to these two arms in a 1:1 ratio (i.e. 15 patients in each group). Secondary end points will measure patient and graft outcome and incidence of immunosuppression-related complications, including: neurotoxicity, diabetes mellitus, growth retardation, vomiting, diarrhea, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, thrombocytopenia, anemia, leukopenia, acute or chronic liver graft rejection, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), viral infections, fungal infections and bacterial infections.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The objective of this study is to compare the effects of two liver transplant immunosuppression regimens on renal function. Patients receiving the standard combination of prednisone and high-dose tacrolimus, a drug with known nephrotoxicity (Arm A) will be compared to patients receiving prednisone, low-dose tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Arm B). MMF is an immunosuppression agent that has no associated nephrotoxicity. The primary end point of the study will be renal function as measured by glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Thirty pediatric liver transplant recipients will be randomized to these two arms in a 1:1 ratio (i.e. 15 patients in each group). Secondary end points will measure patient and graft outcome and incidence of immunosuppression-related complications, including: neurotoxicity, diabetes mellitus, growth retardation, vomiting, diarrhea, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, thrombocytopenia, anemia, leukopenia, acute or chronic liver graft rejection, posttransplant lymphoproliferative disease (PTLD), viral infections, fungal infections and bacterial infections.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • Baylor College of Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 16 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • End-stage liver disease or acute fulminant hepatic failure recalcitrant to conventional medical or surgical therapy.
  • Listed as candidate for pediatric liver transplantation listed with United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS).
  • Patients must be 18 years of age or younger.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of autoimmune disease or primary sclerosing cholangitis.
  • History of end-stage renal disease, dialysis treatment or acute renal failure (not including hepatorenal syndrome).
  • Patients with pretransplant renal insufficiency as determined by a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of <80 mL/min/1.73m2 (see below).
  • Patients with renal agenesis or hypoplasia, polycystic kidney disease, or hydroureter seen on pretransplant renal ultrasound.
  • Patients with malignancy or previous malignancy.
  • Patients with active bacterial, viral, or fungal infections.
  • Patients with a pretransplant diagnosis of diabetes mellitus.
  • Patients with history of previous transplant or multi-organ recipients.
  • Patients with serological evidence of HIV, HBSAg or HCV.
  • Patients with hereditary syndrome that causes genetic deficiency of hypoxanthine-guanine phosphoribosyl-transferase (HGPRT) such as Lesch-Nyhan or Kelley-Seegmiller syndrome.
  • Patients with history of phenylketonuria.
  • Females that are pregnant or breastfeeding.
  • Sexually active females who are not: a) post-menopausal, or b) surgically sterile, and c) using an acceptable method of contraception (oral contraceptive, implanted devices, injection, and barrier devices are acceptable; condoms used alone are not acceptable).
  • Patients with alcohol abuse, substance abuse or smoking within the previous 6 months.
  • Patients or caretakers of patients with psychogenic factors that preclude therapeutic compliance.
  • Inability to reach participating hospital within 2 hours of notification.
  • Any conditions or any circumstance that makes it unsafe to undergo a liver transplant.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: tacrolimus & corticosteroids
Standard post-transplant immunosuppression medications: tacrolimus and corticosteroids
medication that looks like mycophenolate mofetil
Other Names:
  • placebo pill
Experimental: low-dose tacrolimus + steroids + MMF
Comparison arm: low-dose tacrolimus + steroids + MMF
immunosuppresion medication called mycophenolate mofetil, also known as MMF or CellCept
Other Names:
  • CellCept
  • MMF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) two years after liver transplantation as calculated by the Schwartz formula
Time Frame: two years
change in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) two years after liver transplantation as calculated by the Schwartz formula
two years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John Goss, MD, Baylor College of Medicine

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

November 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2005

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 11, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe