Ablation or Surgery for Atrial Fibrillation (AF) Treatment (FAST)

November 18, 2015 updated by: Lucas Boersma, St. Antonius Hospital

Atrial Fibrillation: Ablation or Surgical Treatment; A Randomized Study Comparing Non-pharmacologic Therapy in Patients With Drug-refractory Atrial Fibrillation

The purpose of this study is to compare 2 invasive strategies for Atrial Fibrillation treatment, Endocardial catheter ablation isolation of the Pulmonary veins versus minimally invasive thoracoscopic surgical epicardial isolation. Both strategies are in use for several years now, and have been reported as a successful strategy with success rates of 60-90%. However, it is not known which technique is preferable in a given patient population in terms of efficacy to cure AF, safety, or patient discomfort. Therefore, in the present trial a randomized study is proposed to provide more insight into the relative merits of both techniques

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Atrial Fibrillation is the most common cardiac arrhythmia, affecting millions of people around the world. It is a large burden on health care resources and may even lead to a shorter life expectancy. Drug treatment has been found insufficient and sometimes even hazardous to the pt. Traditionally, there was only one invasive approach available, being MAZE 3 procedure by means of full open chest cardiac surgery. This was a very invasive approach, limited to only a few skilled surgeons, with insufficient options to treat large pt volume.

With the discovery that AF often is initiated and maintained by electrical instability inside and around the Pulmonary Veins, catheter ablation is now a widely accepted early invasive strategy to cure AF. Success rates of 60% to 90% have been reported, depending on technique employed and the type of AF (Resp, chronic versus paroxysmal)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nieuwegein, Netherlands, 3430
        • St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein
      • Barcelona, Spain
        • Hospital Clinic Barcelona

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has a history of symptomatic paroxysmal and/or persistent atrial fibrillation for at least 12 months
  • Patient is refractory to or intolerant of at least one antiarrhythmic drug
  • Patient has an enlarged atrium >40 mm and/or Patient has a failed previous catheter ablation and/or Patient has additional risk factors such as hypertension, increasing age
  • Patient is between 30 and 70 years of age
  • Patient is mentally able and willing to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac ablation or surgical cardiac procedure in the last 3 months
  • Previous cardiac tamponade
  • Previous stroke or TIA
  • Left atrial thrombus
  • Left atrial size >65 mm
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <45 %
  • Active infection or sepsis
  • Pregnancy
  • Unstable angina
  • Myocardial infarction (MI) within previous 3 months
  • Atrial fibrillation is secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or other reversible or non-cardiovascular cause
  • History of blood clotting abnormalities
  • Known sensitivity to heparin or warfarin
  • Life expectancy is less than 12 months
  • Patient is involved in another clinical study involving an investigational drug or device
  • Pleural adhesions
  • Prior thoracotomy
  • Prior cardiac surgery
  • Elevated hemi diaphragm

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
Catheter RF ablation with complete circumferential ablation around the right and PVs, and additional lines between the lower and upper PVs, and towards the mitral valve ring.
RF ablation with complete circumferential ablation around the right and PVs, optional additional lines between the lower and upper PVs, and towards the mitral valve ring.
Active Comparator: 2
Minimal invasive thoracoscopic surgery including isolation of the PVs by AtriCure and removal of the LAA.
Minimal invasive thoracoscopic surgery including isolation of the PVs by AtriCure and removal of the LAA.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Freedom from AF and/or secondary left atrial arrhythmias, lasting >60 sec, as determined by 7 day continuous Holter monitoring.
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Safety and/or adverse events
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Freedom of AADs, Decrease in the frequency and duration of AF episodes, Decrease in the number of AF related hospital admissions, Improvement in quality of life internet Follow Up, Decrease in number of cardioversions, PM implant
Time Frame: 6 and 12 Months
6 and 12 Months
Composite major complications, Serious Adverse Events, Serious Adverse Effects
Time Frame: 12 Months
12 Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lucas Boersma, MD/PhD, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein
  • Principal Investigator: WimJan van Boven, MD, St. Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein
  • Principal Investigator: Lluis Mont, MD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona
  • Principal Investigator: Castella M, MD, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 17, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 21, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 20, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2015

Last Verified

November 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • R-06.30A/FAST

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation

Clinical Trials on Catheter Ablation

3
Subscribe