Study to Test the Long Term Safety and Efficacy of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) in Patients With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder (TAURUS)

October 29, 2024 updated by: Astellas Pharma Inc

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Active Controlled, Multi-center Long-term Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of the Beta-3 Agonist Mirabegron (YM178) 50 mg qd and 100 mg qd in Subjects With Symptoms of Overactive Bladder

The study is intended to test the safety, tolerability, efficacy of two doses of long term once daily (qd) treatment of Mirabegron in patients with symptoms of overactive bladder and secondly to compare these with active comparator.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients who completed 178-CL-046 (NCT00689104) or 178-CL-047 (NCT00662909) or new patients could be enrolled in this study if eligible.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

2792

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Woolloongabba, Australia
      • Graz, Austria, 8036
      • Innsbruck, Austria, 6020
      • Linz, Austria, 4020
      • Minsk, Belarus, 220036
      • Minsk, Belarus, 223041
      • Antwerp, Belgium, 2020
      • Antwerp, Belgium, 2030
      • Edegem, Belgium, 2650
      • Gent, Belgium, 9000
      • Kortrijk, Belgium, 8500
      • Leper, Belgium, 8900
      • Leuven, Belgium, 3000
      • Liege, Belgium, 4000
      • Sint Truiden, Belgium, 3800
      • Montreal, Canada
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2V 4R6
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T5H 3V9
    • British Columbia
      • Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, V3V 1N1
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8T 5G1
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8V 3N1
    • New Brunswick
      • Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada, E2L 3J8
    • Nova Scotia
      • Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada, B2W 2S7
      • Kentville, Nova Scotia, Canada, B4N 4K9
    • Ontario
      • Barrie, Ontario, Canada, L4M 7G1
      • Brampton, Ontario, Canada, L6T 4S5
      • Kitchener, Ontario, Canada, N2N 2B9
      • Markham, Ontario, Canada, L6B 1A1
      • Newmarket, Ontario, Canada, L3X 1W1
      • North Bay, Ontario, Canada, P1B 7K8
      • Oshawa, Ontario, Canada, L1H 1B9
      • Saint Denis, Ontario, Canada, H2X 3J4
      • Thunder Bay, Ontario, Canada, P7E 6E7
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M4N 3M5
    • Quebec
      • Granby, Quebec, Canada, J2G 8Z9
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1A1
      • Point Claire, Quebec, Canada, H9R 4S3
      • Brno, Czechia, 60200
      • Melnik, Czechia, 27601
      • Olomouc, Czechia, 77200
      • Ostrava-Poruba, Czechia, 70853
      • Plzen, Czechia, 30599
      • Prague, Czechia, 12851
      • Prague, Czechia, 14056
      • Prague, Czechia, 18081
      • Steti, Czechia, 41108
      • Usti nad Labem, Czechia, 40001
      • Aalborg, Denmark, 9100
      • Aarhus, Denmark, 8200
      • Glostrup, Denmark, 2600
      • Roskilde, Denmark
      • Helsinki, Finland, 00029
      • Oulu, Finland, 90220
      • Tampere, Finland, 33521
      • Turku, Finland, 20100
      • Colmar, France, 68024
      • Marseille Cedex 9, France, 13274
      • Mulhouse, France, 68070
      • Nimes Cedex 9, France, 30029
      • Orleans Cedex 2, France, 45067
      • Paris-Cedex12, France, 75571
      • Saint Priest en Jarez, France, 42055
      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
      • Toulouse Cedex 9, France, 31059
    • Cedex 10
      • Paris, Cedex 10, France, 75020
      • AIchach, Germany, 86551
      • Bad Ems, Germany, 56130
      • Bautzen, Germany, 02625
      • Berlin, Germany, 13347
      • Duisburg, Germany, 47051
      • Frankfurt, Germany, 65933
      • Ganderkesee, Germany, 27777
      • Hagenow, Germany, 19230
      • Halle/Saale, Germany, 06132
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20253
      • Henningsdorf, Germany, 16761
      • Hettstedt, Germany, 06333
      • Kiel, Germany
      • Koblenz, Germany, 56068
      • Leipzig, Germany, 04105
      • Lutherstadt Eisleben, Germany, 06295
      • Muenchen-Bogenhausen, Germany, 81925
      • Munich, Germany
      • Neustadt I. Sachsen, Germany, 01844
      • Oranienburg, Germany, 16151
      • Radebeul, Germany, 01445
      • Sangerhausen, Germany, 06526
      • Trier, Germany, 54290
      • Uetersen, Germany, 25436
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1047
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1076
      • Nyiregyhaza, Hungary, 4400
      • Sopron, Hungary
      • Szeged, Hungary, 6725
      • Szekesfehervar, Hungary, 8000
      • Szekszard, Hungary, 7100
      • Tatabanya, Hungary, 2800
      • Reykjavik, Iceland, 101
      • Dublin 9, Ireland
      • Mullingar, Ireland
      • Bari, Italy, 70124
      • Catanzaro, Italy, 88100
      • Genoa, Italy, 16128
      • Latina, Italy, 04100
      • Milan, Italy, 20142
      • Modena, Italy, 41100
      • Naples, Italy, 80131
      • Perugia, Italy, 06122
      • Treviglio, Italy, 24047
      • Varese, Italy, 21100
      • Liepaja, Latvia
      • Riga, Latvia
      • Kaunas, Lithuania
      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
      • Apeldoorn, Netherlands, 7334 DZ
      • Eindhoven, Netherlands, 5623 EJ
      • Enschede, Netherlands, 7511 JX
      • Leiden, Netherlands, 2334 CK
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands, 6532 SZ
      • Sneek, Netherlands, 8600 BA
      • Tilburg, Netherlands, 5022 GC
      • Winterswijk, Netherlands, 7101 BN
      • Bergen, Norway, 5021
      • Drammen, Norway, 3016
      • Hamar, Norway, 2317
      • Oslo, Norway, 0257
      • Tonsberg, Norway, 3103
      • Bialystok, Poland, 15-278
      • Lodz, Poland, 93-338
      • Lodz, Poland, 93-513
      • Lublin, Poland, 20-954
      • Warsaw, Poland
      • Warsaw, Poland, 00-846
      • Warsaw, Poland, 02-005
      • Warsaw, Poland, 02-507
      • Wroclaw, Poland, 50-556
      • Amadora, Portugal, 2700
      • Porto, Portugal, 4099-005
      • Tomar, Portugal, 2304-909
      • Bucharest, Romania
      • Bucharest, Romania, 22328
      • Lasi, Romania
      • Oradea, Romania
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 125206
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 111020
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 111123
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117049
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 101000
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 105425
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 117815
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 119435
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 123836
      • St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 197089
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 198013
      • St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 115516
      • Martin, Slovakia, 03659
      • Poprad, Slovakia, 05801
      • Skalica, Slovakia, 90982
      • Trencin, Slovakia, 91101
      • Zilina, Slovakia, 01207
      • Hatfield, South Africa
      • Lyttelton, South Africa
      • Paarl, South Africa
      • Pietermaritzburg, South Africa
      • Roodepoort, South Africa
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08020
      • Bilbao, Spain, 48013
      • Getafe, Spain, 28905
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
      • Madrid, Spain, 28016
      • Mataro, Spain, 8304
      • Miranda de Ebro, Spain, 09200
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41013
      • Toledo, Spain, 45071
      • Valencia, Spain, 46010
      • Huddinge, Sweden, 75185
      • Orebro, Sweden, 70185
      • Skovde, Sweden, 54130
      • Sonkoping, Sweden, 11883
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 17176
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 18288
      • Stockholm, Sweden, 14186
      • Umea, Sweden, 90185
      • Frauenfeld, Switzerland, 8501
      • Luzern, Switzerland, 6000
      • Kiev, Ukraine, 01023
      • Kiev, Ukraine, 04053
      • Bristol, United Kingdom, B15 2TG
      • Chorley, United Kingdom, PR7 7NA
      • Croydon, United Kingdom, CR7 7YE
      • Liverpool, United Kingdom, L22 OLG
      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS
      • London, United Kingdom, W2 2YP
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M15 6SX
      • Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom, NE7 7DN
      • Northwood, United Kingdom, HA6 2RN
      • Reading, United Kingdom, RG1 5AN
      • Reading, United Kingdom, RG2 7AG
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S10 2JF
      • Swansea, United Kingdom, SA6 6NL
    • Alabama
      • Homewood, Alabama, United States, 35209
      • Huntsville, Alabama, United States, 35801
      • Mobile, Alabama, United States, 36608
      • Montgomery, Alabama, United States, 36117
    • Alaska
      • Anchorage, Alaska, United States, 99508
    • Arizona
      • Phoenix, Arizona, United States, 85051
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85712
      • Tucson, Arizona, United States, 85741
    • California
      • Atherton, California, United States, 94027
      • Beverly Hills, California, United States, 90211
      • Buena Park, California, United States, 90620
      • Fresno, California, United States, 93720
      • La Mesa, California, United States, 91942
      • Mission Hills, California, United States, 91345
      • Newport Beach, California, United States, 92660
      • Orange, California, United States, 92869
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95831
      • San Bernardino, California, United States, 92404
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92108
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92120
      • Tarzana, California, United States, 91356
      • Torrance, California, United States, 90505
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80012
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80218
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80211
      • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80112
    • Connecticut
      • New Britain, Connecticut, United States, 06052
      • Waterbury, Connecticut, United States, 06708
    • Florida
      • Aventura, Florida, United States, 33180
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33756
      • Clearwater, Florida, United States, 33761
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States, 33916
      • Miami, Florida, United States, 33136
      • Ocala, Florida, United States, 34471
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
      • Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33027
      • Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States, 33024
      • Sarasota, Florida, United States, 34237
      • Tallahassee, Florida, United States, 32308
      • Tampa, Florida, United States, 33606
      • Wellington, Florida, United States, 33414
      • West Palm Beach, Florida, United States, 33407
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30328
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30034
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060
      • Roswell, Georgia, United States, 30076
    • Idaho
      • Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, United States, 83814
      • Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States, 83404
    • Illinois
      • Melrose Park, Illinois, United States, 60160
    • Indiana
      • Fort Wayne, Indiana, United States, 46825
      • Jeffersonville, Indiana, United States, 47130
      • Newburgh, Indiana, United States, 47630
    • Iowa
      • Des Moines, Iowa, United States, 50309
    • Kansas
      • Wichita, Kansas, United States, 57207
    • Maryland
      • Greenbelt, Maryland, United States, 20770
    • Massachusetts
      • Watertown, Massachusetts, United States, 02472
    • Missouri
      • North Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64116
    • Montana
      • Billings, Montana, United States, 59102
    • Nebraska
      • Lincoln, Nebraska, United States, 68516
      • Omaha, Nebraska, United States, 68114
    • Nevada
      • Las Vegas, Nevada, United States, 89148
    • New Jersey
      • New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States, 08901
      • West Orange, New Jersey, United States, 07052
    • New Mexico
      • Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States, 87109
    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States, 12208
      • Albany, New York, United States, 12205
      • Endwell, New York, United States, 13760
      • Garden City, New York, United States, 11530
      • Kingston, New York, United States, 12401
      • New York, New York, United States, 10016
      • Poughkeepsie, New York, United States, 12601
    • North Carolina
      • Cary, North Carolina, United States, 27518
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28209
      • Concord, North Carolina, United States, 28025
      • Wilmington, North Carolina, United States, 28401
      • Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States, 27103
    • North Dakota
      • Fargo, North Dakota, United States, 58104
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45212
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44122
      • Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43214
      • Lyndhurst, Ohio, United States, 44124
      • Wadsworth, Ohio, United States, 44281
    • Oklahoma
      • Bethany, Oklahoma, United States, 73008
      • Edmond, Oklahoma, United States, 73034
      • Edmond, Oklahoma, United States, 73008
    • Pennsylvania
      • Bala-Cynwyd, Pennsylvania, United States, 19004
      • Jenkintown, Pennsylvania, United States, 19046
      • Lancaster, Pennsylvania, United States, 17604
      • Reading, Pennsylvania, United States, 19611
      • Uniontown, Pennsylvania, United States, 15401
    • Rhode Island
      • Warwick, Rhode Island, United States, 02886
    • South Carolina
      • Greer, South Carolina, United States, 29650
      • Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States, 29464
      • Simpsonville, South Carolina, United States, 29681
    • Tennessee
      • Bristol, Tennessee, United States, 37620
    • Texas
      • Arlington, Texas, United States, 76017
      • Austin, Texas, United States, 78759
      • Corpus Christi, Texas, United States, 78414
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75231
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77024
    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84107
    • Virginia
      • Virginia Beach, Virginia, United States, 23454
    • Washington
      • Mountlake Terrace, Washington, United States, 98043
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98166
      • Spokane, Washington, United States, 99204
      • Tacoma, Washington, United States, 98405

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is willing and able to complete the micturition diary and questionnaires correctly
  • Patient has symptoms of overactive bladder for ≥ 3 months
  • Patient experiences frequency of micturition on average ≥ 8 times per 24-hour period during the 3-day micturition diary period
  • Patient must experience at least 3 episodes of urgency (grade 3 or 4) with or without incontinence, during the 3-day micturition diary period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is breastfeeding, pregnant, intends to become pregnant during the study, or of childbearing potential, sexually active and not practicing a highly reliable method of birth control
  • Patient has significant stress incontinence or mixed stress/urge incontinence where stress is the predominant factor
  • Patient has an indwelling catheter or practices intermittent self-catheterization
  • Patient has diabetic neuropathy
  • Patient has evidence of a symptomatic urinary tract infection, chronic inflammation such as interstitial cystitis, bladder stones, previous pelvic radiation therapy or previous or current malignant disease of the pelvic organs
  • Patient receives non-drug treatment including electro-stimulation therapy
  • Patient has severe hypertension
  • Patient has a known or suspected hypersensitivity to tolterodine, other anticholinergics, YM178, other beta-adrenoreceptor (ß-AR) agonists, or lactose or any of the other inactive ingredients
  • Patient has been treated with any investigational drug or device within 30 days (90 days in the UK for all clinical studies except 178-CL-046)
  • Patient had an average total daily urine volume > 3000 mL as recorded in the 3-day micturition diary period
  • Patient has serum creatinine >150 umol/L, aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and/or alanine aminotransferase (ALT) > 2x upper limit of normal range (ULN), or gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (γ-GT) > 3x ULN
  • Patient has a clinically significant abnormal electrocardiogram (ECG)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mirabegron 50 mg
Participants received mirabegron 50 mg tablets and matching tolterodine extended release (ER) placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 months.
Matching tolterodine placebo capsules.
Tablets
Other Names:
  • YM178
  • Myrbetriq
Experimental: Mirabegron 100 mg
Participants received mirabegron 100 mg tablets and matching tolterodine ER placebo capsules orally once a day for 12 months.
Matching tolterodine placebo capsules.
Tablets
Other Names:
  • YM178
  • Myrbetriq
Active Comparator: Tolterodine ER 4 mg
Participants received tolterodine ER 4 mg capsules and matching mirabegron placebo tablets orally once a day for 12 months.
Matching mirabegron placebo tablets.
Extended release capsules

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With and Severity of Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Time Frame: From the first dose of double-blind study drug up until 30 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 13 months.

An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a patient administered a study drug and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. The investigator assessed the severity of each AE, including abnormal laboratory values, as follows:

Mild: No disruption of normal daily activities; Moderate: Affected normal daily activities; Severe: Inability to perform daily activities.

From the first dose of double-blind study drug up until 30 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 13 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
The average number of micturitions (urinations) per 24 hours was derived from the number of times a patient urinates (excluding incontinence only episodes) per day recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days prior to clinic visits at Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12/end of treatment. Least squares (LS) means were generated from the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, previous study history, gender and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
The average number of incontinence episodes (any involuntary leakage of urine) per day was derived from the number of incontinence episodes recorded by the patient in a micturition diary for 3-days prior to clinic visits at Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12/end of treatment. Least squares (LS) means were generated from the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, previous study history, gender and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and Final Visit in Mean Volume Voided Per Micturition
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
The average volume voided per micturition was calculated from the volume of each micturition measured by the patient and recorded in a micturition diary for 3 days prior to clinic visits at Baseline and months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12/end of treatment. LS means were generated from the ANCOVA model with treatment group, previous study history, gender and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Incontinence Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
The involuntary leakage of urine accompanied or immediately proceeded by urgency, derived from the number of incontinence episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0=No urgency; 1=Mild urgency; 2=Moderate urgency, could postpone voiding a short time; 3=Severe urgency, could not postpone voiding; 4=Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to toilet. LS means are from the ANCOVA model with treatment group, previous study history, gender and geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Urgency Episodes (Grade 3 and/or 4) Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
The average number of urgency episodes (the sudden, compelling desire to pass urine that is difficult to defer) derived from episodes classified by the patient in a 3-day micturition diary as 3 or 4 on the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0=No urgency; 1=Mild urgency; 2=Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short time; 3=Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4=Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, previous study history, gender & geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and Final Visit in Mean Level of Urgency
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Average of patients' ratings on the degree of urgency associated with each micturition and/or incontinence episode recorded in a 3-day micturition diary according to the Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale: 0 = No urgency; 1 = Mild urgency; 2 = Moderate urgency, could delay voiding a short while; 3 = Severe urgency, could not delay voiding; 4 = Urge incontinence, leaked before arriving to the toilet. LS means are generated from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, previous study history, gender & geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and Final Visit in the Mean Number of Pads Used Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12

The average number of times a patient records a new pad used per day during the 3-day micturition diary period.

LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, previous study history, gender & geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and Final Visit in Mean Number of Nocturia Episodes Per 24 Hours
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12

Nocturia is defined as waking at night one or more times to void. The average number of times a patient urinated (excluding incontinence only episodes) during sleeping time per day was derived from the 3-day patient micturition diary.

LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, previous study history, gender & geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Zero Incontinence Episodes at Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 and the Final Visit
Time Frame: Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
The percentage of participants with no incontinence episodes for the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the micturition diary recorded by the patient.
Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Percentage of Participants With ≥ 50% Reduction in Incontinence Episodes at Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12 and the Final Visit
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
The percentage of participants with at least a 50% decrease from baseline in mean number of incontinence episodes per 24 hours during the 3 days prior to each clinic visit derived from the patient micturition diary.
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and Final Visit in Symptom Bother Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12

Overactive bladder symptoms were assessed using the symptom bother scale of the overactive bladder questionnaire. The symptom bother scale consists of 8 questions answered by the patient on a scale from 1-6. The total symptom bother score was calculated from the 8 answers and then transformed to range from 0 to 100, with 100 indicating worst severity. A negative change from Baseline in symptom bother score indicates improvements.

LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, previous study history, gender & geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and Final Visit in Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) Total Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12

Health-related quality of life was assessed by the HRQL subscales (coping, concern, sleep and social interaction) of the overactive bladder questionnaire (OABq). The HRQL total score was calculated by adding the 4 HRQL subscale scores, and transforming to a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A positive change from Baseline in HRQL score indicates improvements.

LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, previous study history, gender & geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Change From Baseline to Month 12 and Final Visit in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12

The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement.

LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, previous study history, gender & geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.

Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline to Month 12 and Final Visit in Treatment Satisfaction-visual Analog Scale (TS-VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
The TS-VAS is a visual analog scale (VAS) that asks patients to rate their satisfaction with treatment by placing a vertical mark on a 10 cm line where the endpoints are labeled 'No, not at all' on the left (=0) to 'Yes, completely satisfied' on the right (=10). A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. LS means are from an ANCOVA model with treatment group, previous study history, gender & geographical regions as fixed factors and baseline as a covariate.
Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline to Months 3, 6, 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Work Time Missed
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent of work time missed is derived from the number of hours of work missed due to OAB symptoms as a percentage of total hours that should have been worked. A higher percentage indicates more hours missed. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 3, 6, 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Impairment While Working
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent impairment while working was derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 3, 6, 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Overall Work Impairment
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with work productivity in the last 7 days. Percent overall work impairment takes into account both hours missed due to OAB symptoms and the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their productivity while working. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 3, 6, 12 and Final Visit in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI): Percent Activity Impairment
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
The Work Productivity and Activity Impairment: Specific Health Problem (WPAI:SHP) questionnaire was used to assess the degree and extent to which overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms interfered with daily activities over the last 7 days. Percent activity impairment is derived from the patient's assessment of the degree to which OAB affected their regular daily activities. A higher percentage indicates greater impairment and less productivity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Mobility Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12

The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

I have no problems in walking about; I have some problems in walking about; I am confined to bed.

In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Self-Care Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12

The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

I have no problems with self-care; I have some problems washing or dressing myself; I am unable to wash or dress myself. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Usual Activities Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
The EQ-5D is a standardized, nondisease-specific instrument for describing health status. Participants were asked which statement best describes their health state with regard to usual activities (work, study or leisure): I have no problems performing my usual activities; I have some problems performing my usual activities; I am unable to perform my usual activities. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available at that Visit.
Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Pain/Discomfort Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12

The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

I have no pain or discomfort; I have moderate pain or discomfort; I have extreme pain or discomfort. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline to Final Visit in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Anxiety/Depression Score
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12

The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, nondisease-specific (i.e., generic) instrument for describing and valuing health status. Participants were asked to indicate which of the following statements best describes their health state:

I am not anxious or depressed; I am moderately anxious or depressed; I am extremely anxious or depressed. In the table below, each row title lists Baseline health status first followed by Final Visit health status and reports the number of patients in that category. Missing data indicates patients with no data available for that Visit.

Baseline and Month 12
Change From Baseline to Months 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and Final Visit in the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
The EQ-5D is an international, standardized, generic instrument for describing and evaluating health status. Health status is assessed by patients evaluating their health on a vertical, visual analog scale from 0 to 100 where the endpoints are labeled 'Worst imaginable health state' (=0) and 'Best imaginable health state' (=100). On the EQ-5D VAS, a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement.
Baseline and Months 1, 3, 6, 9 and 12
Change From Baseline to Months 3, 6, 12 and Final Visit in Number of Non-study Related Visits to Physician
Time Frame: Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
The number of times the patient visited a physician's office during the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (excluding study visits) because of the patient's bladder condition.
Baseline and Months 3, 6 and 12
Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC)
Time Frame: Baseline and Month 12
The PPBC scale is a global assessment tool that asks patients to rate their impression of their current bladder condition on a 6-point scale from 1: 'Does not cause me any problems at all'; 2: 'Causes me some very minor problems'; 3: 'Causes me some minor problems'; 4: 'Causes me (some) moderate problems'; 5: 'Causes me severe problems' and 6: 'Causes me many severe problems'. Improvement was defined as at least a one point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline and a major improvement was defined as at least a two point improvement from Baseline to post-baseline in PPBC score.
Baseline and Month 12
Safety as Assessed by Adverse Events (AEs), Vital Signs, Laboratory Tests, Physical Examination and Electrocardiogram
Time Frame: From the first dose of double-blind study drug up until 30 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 13 months.

An abnormality identified during a medical test was defined as an AE if the abnormality induced clinical signs or symptoms, required active intervention, interruption or discontinuation of study drug or was clinically significant. The Investigator assessed each AE for causal relationship (not related, possible or probable) to study drug. A serious AE (SAE) was any untoward medical occurrence that: resulted in death, was life-threatening, resulted in significant disability/incapacity or congenital anomaly/birth defect, required or prolonged hospitalization or was a medically important event.

The data reported represent the number of participants with adverse events in each category.

From the first dose of double-blind study drug up until 30 days after the last dose of study drug, up to 13 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Central Contact, Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 25, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

May 6, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 29, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2008

First Posted (Estimated)

June 3, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2024

Last Verified

October 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe