Miglustat in Cystic Fibrosis

March 5, 2014 updated by: Actelion

Single Center, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Two-period/Two-treatment Crossover Study Investigating the Effect of Miglustat on the Nasal Potential Difference in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis Homozygous for the F508del Mutation

Single Center, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Two-Period/Two-Treatment Crossover Study Investigating the Effect of Miglustat on the Nasal Potential Difference in Patients With Cystic Fibrosis Homozygous for the F508del Mutation

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

11

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussels, Belgium, B-1200
        • Université Catholique de Louvain

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

12 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 12 years and older
  • Male or female Non-pregnant women who are to remain non-pregnant for 3 months after the end of the study. Women of childbearing potential must use a reliable method of contraception. Reliable methods of contraception for female patients include the following:
  • barrier type devices (e.g., female condom, diaphragm and contraceptive sponge) used ONLY in combination with a spermicide
  • intrauterine devices
  • oral contraceptive agent
  • Depo-Provera™ (medroxyprogesterone acetate)
  • levonorgestrel implants Abstention, the rhythm method or contraception by the partner alone are NOT reliable methods of contraception. A woman is considered to have child-bearing potential unless she meets at least one of the following criteria:
  • 6 weeks post-surgical bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy or hysterectomy
  • Premature ovarian failure confirmed by a specialist gynecologist
  • Age > 50 years and not treated with any kind of HRT for at least 2 years prior to screening, and with amenorrhea for at least 24 consecutive months prior to screening and a serum FSH level of > 40 IU/L at screening.
  • Age > 55 years and treated with HRT prior to screening with an appropriate medical documentation of spontaneous amenorrhea for at least 24 months. For female patients in the pediatric age range, a reliable method of contraception must be considered, if appropriate.

    • Male patients accepting for the duration of the study and for 3 months thereafter to use a condom and not to procreate a child (not in case of azoospermia)
    • Cystic fibrosis patients homozygous for the F508del mutation as confirmed by genetic test
    • Signed informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any condition prohibiting the correct measurement of the NPD such as upper respiratory tract infection
  • Acute upper respiratory tract or pulmonary exacerbation requiring antibiotic intervention within 2 weeks of screening
  • Severe renal impairment (creatinine clearance < 30 mL/min as per Cockroft and Gault)
  • Female patients of childbearing potential who will not undergo a pregnancy test prior to enrollment into the study
  • History of significant lactose intolerance
  • History of neuropathy
  • Presence of clinically significant diarrhea (> 3 liquid stools per day for > 7 days) without definable cause within 1 month prior to screening
  • Any known factor or disease that might interfere with treatment compliance, study conduct or interpretation of the results such as drug or alcohol dependence or psychiatric disease
  • FEV1 < 25% of predicted normal
  • Oxygen saturation at rest < 88%
  • Active or passive smoking as measured using the Smokelyzer®
  • Hypersensitivity to miglustat or any excipients
  • Planned treatment or treatment with another investigationaldrug or therapy (e.g., gene therapy) within 1 month prior to randomization
  • Breast-feeding, pregnant women or women who plan to become pregnant during the course of the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: 2
placebo
Oral placebo capsules matching in appearance miglustat capsules given t.i.d. (three times a day) for 7 days and a single dose on Day 8
Experimental: 1
miglustat
Oral miglustat capsules 200 mg t.i.d. (three times a day) for 7 days and a single 200 mg dose on Day 8

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The sum of responses in nasal potential difference (NPD) after perfusion with isoproterenol and chloride-free buffer (TCS: Total Chloride Secretion), in the presence of amiloride.
Time Frame: Change from baseline (pre-dose on Day 1) to end-of-treatment (Day 8)
Change from baseline (pre-dose on Day 1) to end-of-treatment (Day 8)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in basline nasal potential difference (NPD) response
Time Frame: From baseline (pre-dose on Day 1) to end-of-treatment
From baseline (pre-dose on Day 1) to end-of-treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Patrick Lebecque, MD, PhD, Catholic University of Louvain

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 26, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

August 27, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 7, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2014

Last Verified

March 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe