Terlipressin Given As I.V. Boluses Versus Terlipressin Given As Continuous Intravenous Infusion In Patients With Cirrhosis And Type 1 Hepatorenal Syndrome

October 11, 2014 updated by: University of Padova

Terlipressin Given As I.V. Boluses Vs Terlipressin Given As Continuous Intravenous Infusion In Patients With Cirrhosis And Type 1 Hepatorenal Syndrome (Hrs): Preliminary Results Of A Randomized Controlled Clinical Study.

It is well known that terlipressin and albumin improve renal function in patients with cirrhosis and type 1 HRS. In previous studies terlipressin has been used either as intravenous boluses moving from an initial dose of 0.5-1 mg/4 hr or as continuous intravenous infusion at the initial dose of 2 mg/24 h. Up to now the two schedules of i.v. administration of terlipressin have never been compared. Nevertheless, it has been hypothesized that continuous intravenous infusion assures a more steady profile of effect on portal pressure in patients with cirrhosis. Thus, the aim of the study will be to compare terlipressin given as i.v. bolus vs terlipressin given as continuous intravenous infusion in the treatment of type 1 HRS in patients with cirrhosis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

70

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Padova, Italy, 35100
        • Recruiting
        • Liver Unit, General Hospital
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Giulio Maresio, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with cirrhosis and type 1 HRS

Exclusion Criteria:

  • HCC beyond the Milan Criteria,septic shock (systolic arterial pressure < 90 mmHg,
  • Significant heart or respiratory failure,
  • Peripheral arteriophaty clinically significant,
  • Previous heart stroke or significant alteration of the ECG

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1
35 patients with cirrhosis and type 1 HRS
Patients who will be randomly assigned to arm 1 will received terlipressin given by intravenous boluses at the initial dose of terlipressin was 0.5 mg/4 hr. In case of non response, the dose of terlipressin was progressively increased up to a maximum of 2 mg/4 hr. Human albumin will be given intravenously at the dose of 1 g/kg of body weight on the first day followed by 20-40 g/day.
Experimental: 2
35 patients with cirrhosis and type 1 HRS
Patients who will be randomly assigned to arm 1 will received terlipressin given as intravenous boluses at the initial dose of 0.5 mg/4 hr. In case of non response, the dose of terlipressin will be progressively increased up to a maximum of 2 mg/4 hr. Human albumin will be given at the dose of 1 g/kg of body weight at the first day followed by 20-40 g/day.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary end-point of the study is the complete reform of the renal function (creatinine < 1.5 mg/dl).
Time Frame: The treatment will be continued for a maximum of 15 days
The treatment will be continued for a maximum of 15 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 26, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

August 28, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 15, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 11, 2014

Last Verified

October 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe