Transfacial Sutures Versus Stapler for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair

November 1, 2023 updated by: Medtronic - MITG

Mesh Shrinkage Following Transfacial Suturing Versus Stapler for Mesh Fixation in Laparoscopic Ventral Hernia Repair: a Prospective, Randomised Blinded Study

Hernia of the abdominal wall occur frequently after various surgical procedures of the abdomen and are increasingly performed by laparoscopic means. Different mesh fixation techniques are applied, but the influence of mesh fixation on shrinkage is not known in human patients. Therefore, mesh shrinkage was assessed using two different techniques for fixation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Ventral hernia repair is increasingly performed by laparoscopic means. While mesh ingrowth and shrink-age has been analysed in the experimental setting, there is scarce data available in humans. In addition, different mesh fixation techniques are applied, but the influence of mesh fixation on shrinkage is not known in human patients.

Mesh shrinkage is assessed using two different techniques for fixation.

Blinded randomized trial using a Parietene composite mesh for laparoscopic ventral hernia repair. Patients with ventral hernias of no larger than 8 cm were assigned to either mesh fixation using transfacial nonabsorbable sutures or titan tacks. Primary endpoint was mesh migration, secondary endpoints were mesh shrinkage, surgical morbidity and pain.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

36

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bern, Switzerland, 3010
        • Dep. of Visceral and Transplantsurgery, Bern University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with incisional hernia smaller than 8cm in diameter
  • obtained informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy
  • Residual intraperitoneal mesh
  • contaminated abdominal cavity
  • longterm use of corticosteroids and other immunosuppressive agents
  • bodymass index > 45
  • general contradictions for laparoscopy

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: A
transfacial sutures
mesh fixation by transfacial sutures
Other: B
staples
mesh fixation by staples

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
mesh shrinkage
Time Frame: perioperative, 6 weeks, 6 months postoperative
perioperative, 6 weeks, 6 months postoperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
mesh dislocation
Time Frame: perioperative, 6 weeks postoperative,6 months postoperative
perioperative, 6 weeks postoperative,6 months postoperative
pain
Time Frame: perioperative, 6 weeks postoperative,6 months, 12 moths postoperative
perioperative, 6 weeks postoperative,6 months, 12 moths postoperative
recurrence
Time Frame: perioperative, 6 weeks postoperative,6 months, 12 months postoperative
perioperative, 6 weeks postoperative,6 months, 12 months postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guido1 Beldi, MD, Bern University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2008

First Posted (Estimated)

October 16, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 2, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2023

Last Verified

November 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • KEK_11/05

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe