Comparative Study of Individualized Sensitivity-Directed Chemotherapy Versus DTIC (ChemoSensMM)

October 22, 2008 updated by: University of Wuerzburg

Prospectively Randomized Phase III Study of an Individualized Sensitivity-Directed Combination Chemotherapy Versus DTIC as First-Line Treatment in Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma

This phase III trial is aimed to investigate the efficacy of an individualized, sensitivity-directed combination chemotherapy in comparison to the standard regimen DTIC.

Two question are aimed to be answered by this study:

  1. Is the individual chemosensitivity index (BICSI) a prognostic / predictive biomarker for chemotherapy ?
  2. Is an individualized, sensitivity-directed combination chemotherapy superior to the standard regimen DTIC in terms of survival and response ?

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Melanoma is a cutaneous neoplasm known for its high aggressiveness, its early dissemination of metastases, and its poor prognosis once metastasized. Chemotherapy with dacarbacine (DTIC) is widely accepted as the standard treatment in metastatic melanoma, with reported response rates of about 10%. This poor outcome is assumed to be due to a high chemoresistance intrinsic to melanoma cells. However, other therapeutic options like polychemotherapy, biochemotherapy, immunotherapy as well as targeted agents did not yet prove to be superior to DTIC in multicenter randomized studies.

Therefore, chemotherapy still is considered as the main therapeutic option in advanced metastatic melanoma, and a number of non-standard chemotherapeutics have been tested in small pilot studies to improve treatment efficacy. Even though complete remissions of metastatic lesions could only be observed in a few patients, these observations indicate a subgroup of patients exhibiting high sensitivity to certain anticancer drugs. An in vitro ATP-based chemosensitivity assay has been shown to differentiate between chemosensitive and chemoresistant melanoma patients. A phase-II-study testing this assay in 53 metastatic melanoma patients followed by a sensitivity-directed individualized chemotherapy demonstrated, that the chemosensitivity profile of an individual patient, reflected by the best individual chemosensitivity index (BICSI), correlated with therapy outcome in terms of therapy response and patient overall survival (Ugurel S: Clin Cancer Res 2006). Interestingly, a surprisingly high proportion of about 2/5 of the investigated patient cohort were classified as chemosensitive, the remaining 3/5 were classified as chemoresistant. Objective response was 36.4% in chemosensitive patients compared to 16.1% in chemoresistant patients (p=0.114); progression arrest (CR+PR+SD) was 59.1% versus 22.6% (p=0.01). Chemosensitive patients showed an increased overall survival of 14.6 months compared to 7.4 months in chemoresistant patients (p=0.041).

These encouraging results prompted the initiation of this randomized phase-III-trial investigating an individualized sensitivity-directed combination chemotherapy compared to the current standard treatment DTIC, as first-line treatment in metastatic melanoma. The therapeutics for chemosensitivity testing and treatment of patients were chosen considering the results of the phase-II-trial (paclitaxel+cisplatinum, treosulfan+cytarabine).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

360

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Aachen, Germany, 52074
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Aachen
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hans F Merk, Prof. (MD)
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Berlin Charite
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Uwe Trefzer, PD (MD)
      • Bochum, Germany, 44791
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Bochum
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Norbert Brockmeyer, Prof. (MD)
      • Bonn, Germany, 53111
        • Recruiting
        • Medizinisches Zentrum Bonn Friedensplatz
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Uwe Reinhold, Prof. (MD)
      • Essen, Germany, 45147
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Essen
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Dirk Schadendorf, Prof. (MD)
      • Frankfurt / Main, Germany, 60590
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Frankfurt
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Roland Kaufmann, Prof. (MD)
      • Frankfurt/Oder, Germany, 15236
        • Recruiting
        • Dermatology, Klinikum Frankfurt/Oder
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Anett Milling, Dr. (MD)
      • Hannover, Germany, 30449
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Hannover
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Ralf Gutzmer, PD (MD)
      • Homburg/Saar, Germany, 66421
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, Saarland University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Knuth Rass, Dr. (MD)
      • Jena, Germany, 07740
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Jena
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Martin Kaatz, Dr. (MD)
      • Kiel, Germany, 24105
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Axel Hauschild, Prof. (MD)
      • Ludwigshafen, Germany, 67063
        • Recruiting
        • Dermatology, Klinikum Ludwishafen
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Edgar Dippel, Prof. (MD)
      • Luebeck, Germany, 23538
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Schleswig-Holstein Campus Luebeck
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patrick Terheyden, Dr. (MD)
      • Magdeburg, Germany, 39120
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, Univeristy of Magdeburg
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Martin Leverkus, Prof. (MD)
      • Mainz, Germany, 55131
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Mainz
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Carmen Loquai, Dr. (MD)
      • Mannheim, Germany, 68167
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Mannheim
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jessica Hassel, Dr. (MD)
      • Marburg, Germany, 35033
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Marburg
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Hertl, Prof. (MD)
      • Muenchen, Germany, 80337
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Muenchen
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Carola Berking, Prof. (MD)
      • Muenster, Germany, 48149
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Muenster
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Cord Sunderkoetter, Prof. (MD)
      • Muenster, Germany, 48157
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Medical Oncology, Fachklinik Hornheide
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Michael Fluck, Dr. (MD)
      • Quedlinburg, Germany, 06484
        • Recruiting
        • Dermatology, Klinikum Dorothea Christiane Erxleben
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Jens Ulrich, PD (MD)
      • Tuebingen, Germany, 72086
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Claus Garbe, Prof. (MD)
      • Wuerzburg, Germany, 97080
        • Recruiting
        • Dept of Dermatology, University of Wuerzburg
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Selma Ugurel, Prof. (MD)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed melanoma of the skin, mucosa, or unknown primary, diagnosed with surgically unresectable distant metastases (stage IV according to AJCC).
  • At least one measurable target lesion according to RECIST, assessed by CT or MRI (tumor assessment by X-ray or ultrasonography only is not allowed).
  • Access to a biopsy of ~1 cm3 from at least one metastatic lesion for in vitro chemosensitivity testing. Cell suspensions from malignant effusions are also eligible.
  • No prior chemotherapy in stage IV (adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III allowed; one prior regimen of immunotherapy or targeted therapy in stage IV allowed).
  • No evidence of brain/CNS metastases. Former history of brain/CNS metastases, which have been treated successfully, and are no longer visible in CT/MRI is allowed.
  • Last complete tumor assessment (CT or MRI of thorax, abdomen and brain) not older than 14 days prior to registration, and not older than 5 weeks prior to onset of study treatment.
  • ECOG/WHO performance index of 0 or 1.
  • Patients must have stopped any kind of previous antineoplastic therapy for at least 2 weeks prior to registration, and at least 4 weeks prior to treatment onset.
  • Patients must not have concurrent or recent malignancies except for surgically cured carcinoma in-situ of the cervix and basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Patients with previous malignancies, which have been treated with a subsequent disease-free interval of at least 5 years, are eligible.
  • Patient age ≥ 18 years.
  • Adequate hematological, renal and liver function as defined by the following laboratory values performed within 14 days prior to randomisation:

    • absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥ 1.5 x 109/l
    • platelet count ≥ 100 x 109/l
    • hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dl
    • urea and serum creatinine ≤ 2 times upper normal limit (UNL)
    • total and direct serum bilirubin ≤ 2 times UNL
    • GOT or GPT ≤ 2.5 times UNL; ≤ 5 times UNL is allowed in case of liver metastasis
    • alkaline phosphatase < 2.5 times UNL
  • Female patients should not be pregnant or nursing. Women of childbearing potential should be using a highly effective method of birth control (e.g. implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some IUDs, sexual abstinence or vasectomised partner). For subjects using a hormonal contraceptive method, information regarding the product under evaluation and its potential effect on the contraceptive should be addressed.
  • Male patients should use an effective method of contraception.
  • Before registration, written informed consent must be given according to GCP guidelines and national/local regulations. Patients must be willing and giving informed consent to participation in the trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • All metastatic lesions are surgically resectable.
  • Prior chemotherapy in stage IV (adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III allowed; one prior regimen of immunotherapy or targeted therapy in stage IV allowed).
  • Primary melanoma of the uvea / choroidea.
  • Evidence of brain/CNS metastases. Former history of brain/CNS metastases, which have been treated successfully, and are no longer visible in CT/MRI is allowed.
  • ECOG/WHO performance index of 2 or higher
  • Concurrent or recent malignancies except for surgically cured carcinoma in-situ of the cervix and basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin. Patients with previous malignancies, which have been treated with a subsequent disease-free interval of at least 5 years, are eligible.
  • Any severe or uncontrolled hematological, renal or liver dysfunction as defined by the laboratory values given in Inclusion Criteria.
  • Any clinically uncontrolled infectious disease including HIV positivity or AIDS-related illness.
  • Any female patients who are pregnant or nursing.
  • Any psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration for the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: A (individualized combined chemotherapy)
paclitaxel 200 mg/m2 cisplatin 50 mg/m2 d1 every 21 days
Other Names:
  • taxomedac + cisplatin medac
treosulfan 2500 mg/m2, d2 cytarabine 100 mg/m2, d1-3 every 21 days
Other Names:
  • ovastat + alexan
Active Comparator: B (DTIC monochemotherapy)
1000 mg/m2, d1 every 21 days
Other Names:
  • detimedac

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Disease-specific overall survival
Time Frame: 4 years
4 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Objective response
Time Frame: 4 years
4 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Selma Ugurel, Prof. (MD), Dept of Dermatology, University of Wuerzburg

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 1, 2012

Study Completion (Anticipated)

April 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

October 24, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 24, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 22, 2008

Last Verified

October 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Melanoma

Clinical Trials on paclitaxel + cisplatin

3
Subscribe