Propofol Versus Midazolam as Premedication for Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome (RDS)

November 24, 2008 updated by: Federal University of Minas Gerais

Propofol and Remifentanil Versus Midazolam and Remifentanil as Premedication Allowing Very Early Extubation After Surfactant Treatment in Preterm Neonates With Respiratory Distress Syndrome

The aim of the study is to compare the intubation conditions among propofol and remifentanil versus midazolam and remifentanil in premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. At the same time, to show the group of drugs that could let the neonates with no residual sedation after the use of surfactant (the possibility of the premature neonates to be readily extubated after the use of surfactant).

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

It has been demonstrated that remifentanil, due to it its very short context-sensitive, has an interesting potential for use in premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome. Indeed, remifentanil allowed an adequate level of sedation and analgesia as well as rapid recovery after discontinuation. The aim of the present study was to compares the intubation conditions among propofol and remifentanil versus midazolam and remifentanil in premature neonates with respiratory distress syndrome.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Minas Gerais
      • Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil, 30620470
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Neonatology of Julia Kubitschek Hospital
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Márcia G Penido, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

30 minutes to 2 days (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Gestational age between 28-34 wk
  • Clinical and radiological features compatible with respiratory distress syndrome that required elective tracheal intubation and surfactant therapy
  • Hemodynamic stability before tracheal intubation
  • Signature (parents) consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The presence of major congenital malformations
  • Birth weigh less than 1000 g
  • Previous use of opioid or other sedative drug for any reason
  • Previous tracheal intubation
  • Hemodynamic instability before the indication of tracheal intubation
  • Refuse of the parents to enroll the neonate in the study protocol

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Time until extubation after bolus dose as premedication for tracheal intubation
Time Frame: within the first 3 days of life
within the first 3 days of life

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of intubation with the combination of drugs used for premedication
Time Frame: within the first 2 days of life
within the first 2 days of life

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • SILVA,Y.P. et al. Morphine versus remifentanil for intubating preterm neonates. Short report.Archives of Disease in Childhood Fetal & Neonatal Edition;92:4.2007. Dani C, Bertini G, Pezzati M, et al. Early Extubation and Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure After Surfactant Treatment for Respiratory Distress Syndrome Among Preterm Infants <30 Weeks' Gestation. Pediatrics 2004; 113:560-563. Carbajal R, Eble B, Anand KJS. Premedication for Tracheal Intubation in Neonates: Confusion or Controversy? Seminars in Perinatology 2007; 31:309-317. Silva YP, Gomez RS, Marcatto JO, et al. Early awakening and extubation with remifentanil in ventilated premature neonates. Pediatric Anesthesia 2008; 18:176-183. Welzing L, Roth B. Experience with remifentanil in neonates and infants. Drugs 2006; 66(10):1339-1350.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2008

Last Verified

August 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on propofol

3
Subscribe