Validation and Precision Treatment of Inflammatory Subphenotypes in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Multicenter Cohort Study (VATIC)

December 29, 2025 updated by: Ling Liu, Southeast University, China
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common and life-threatening condition in intensive care units, characterized by substantial biological and clinical heterogeneity. Differences in patients' inflammatory responses, baseline immune function, and organ failure patterns contribute to variability in ARDS severity, treatment response, and clinical outcomes. Precision classification of ARDS based on biological and inflammatory characteristics may therefore be essential for improving patient outcomes. Previous analyses of randomized clinical trials have identified two reproducible inflammatory subphenotypes-"hyperinflammatory" and "hypoinflammatory"-which differ in organ dysfunction profiles, clinical trajectories, and responses to treatments such as fluid management strategies, corticosteroids, and ventilatory interventions. However, key uncertainties remain, including whether these inflammatory subphenotypes can be validated in Chinese ARDS populations, how various bedside prediction models perform in identifying these subphenotypes, and whether model-based subphenotype identification can guide individualized treatment decisions. This multicenter cohort study aims to: (1) validate inflammatory subphenotypes of ARDS using latent class analysis; (2) compare the predictive performance of existing bedside models for subphenotype identification; and (3) assess whether subphenotype assignment based on prediction models can guide individualized treatment strategies, including fluid management, PEEP titration, and corticosteroid use. In addition to these primary aims, the study may include other exploratory objectives, such as evaluating subphenotype stability over time, characterizing biological pathways associated with subphenotypes, and assessing additional treatment-response patterns to support future precision ARDS management strategies.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Jiangsu
      • Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210009
        • Recruiting
        • Zhongda Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with ARDS

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥ 18 years.
  2. ARDS requiring invasive mechanical ventilation, diagnosed according to the 2023 Global definition.
  3. Onset of ARDS within 72 hours.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Refusal of informed consent by the patient's legally authorized representative.
  2. Patients expected to die within 24 hours

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
ARDS patients with hyperinflammatory phenotype
ARDS patients with idfferent Inflammatory Subphenotypes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
28-day mortality
Time Frame: From inclusion to 28 days
The proportion of patients who are died within 28 days
From inclusion to 28 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Ventilator-free days at 28 days
Time Frame: From inclusion to 28 days
Days alive without endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation
From inclusion to 28 days
60-day mortality
Time Frame: From inclusion to 60 days
The proportion of patients who are died within 60 days
From inclusion to 60 days
Vasopressor-free days at 28 days
Time Frame: From inclusion to 28 days
Days alive without use of vasopressor
From inclusion to 28 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 29, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 4, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 29, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Subphenotype Of ARDS

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Clinical Trials on ARDS Inflammatory Subphenotypes

Subscribe