Study Evaluating Long-Term Safety of Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained Release With Japanese Adult Subjects in Major Depressive Disorder (MDD)

November 15, 2018 updated by: Pfizer

A 10-Month Open-Label Evaluation Of The Long-Term Safety Of Desvenlafaxine Succinate Sustained Release In Japanese Adults With Major Depressive Disorder

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the long-term safety of desvenlafaxine succinate sustained release tablets during 10-month open-label treatment of Japanese subjects with major depressive disorder (MDD).

The secondary objective is to evaluate the long-term response of subjects receiving desvenlafaxine succinate sustained release tablets by clinical global evaluation, general well-being and absence of symptoms.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

304

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Aichi, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Chiba, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Fukuoka, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Fukushima, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Gunma, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Hiroshima, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Hokkaido, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Hyogo, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Ishikawa, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Kanagawa, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Kumamoto, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Kyoto, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Saga, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Saitama, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Shiga, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Pfizer Investigational Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Outpatients who have completed double-blind therapy in short-term study for the indication of major depressive disorder (MDD), including scheduled evaluations, with no major protocol violations and no study events that, in the opinion of the investigator, would preclude the subject's entry into the long-term, open-label study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically important abnormalities on baseline (day 56 of the short-term study) physical examination, or any unresolved clinically significant abnormalities on electrocardiogram (ECG), laboratory test results, or vital signs recorded before day 56 in the previous short-term study for the indication of MDD.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
DVS SR
25-mg or 50-mg DVS SR tablets taken orally, once daily, at the same time each day. 100 mg dose will be supplied as 2 tablets of 50-mg tablet.
Other Names:
  • DVS-233; Pristiq

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Psychiatric Scale for Depression-17 Item (HAM-D17) Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Extension Study) up to Day 308 or Final On-Therapy (FOT) Evaluation
HAM-D17 is a standardized, clinician-administered rating scale that assesses 17 items characteristically associated with major depression. Items are scored on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4) with 0=none/absent and 4=most severe, for a maximum total score of 50. Higher scores indicate greater severity. FOT evaluation is defined as the last "on-therapy" evaluation, regardless of the number of days on therapy. Analysis on Observed cases (non-missing data) and Last observation carried forward (LOCF); LOCF method of imputation for any missing value at any visit.
Baseline (Extension Study) up to Day 308 or Final On-Therapy (FOT) Evaluation
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame: Baseline (Extension Study) up to Day 329 or 15 days after last dose of study treatment
Any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study treatment was considered an AE without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An AE resulting in any of the following outcomes, or deemed to be significant for any other reason, was considered to be an SAE: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; a life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly.
Baseline (Extension Study) up to Day 329 or 15 days after last dose of study treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Categorical Scores on Clinical Global Impression-Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: Day 308 or FOT Evaluation
CGI-I is a 7-point clinician rated scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), or 3 (minimally improved) on the scale. Higher score = more affected.
Day 308 or FOT Evaluation
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness [CGI-S] Score
Time Frame: Baseline (Extension Study) up to Day 308 or FOT Evaluation
CGI-S is a 7-point clinician rated scale to assess severity of current illness state. Range is 1 (normal - not ill at all) to 7 (among the most extremely ill). Higher score = more affected.
Baseline (Extension Study) up to Day 308 or FOT Evaluation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 27, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

January 29, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 7, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 15, 2018

Last Verified

November 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe