- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00847184
Comparison of Airtraq Versus MacIntosh Intubation Via Nasal Approach
February 18, 2009 updated by: Kliniken Essen-Mitte
Comparison of Airtraq vs. MacIntosh Intubation Via Nasal Approach
Time, success rate, and number of optimising maneuvers for tracheal intubation via the nasal approach are not different when Aitraq technique is used compared to a standard MacIntosh blade.
Study Overview
Status
Unknown
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
One hundred adult patients with an expected easy intubation and 100 patients with an expected difficult intubation are enrolled.
Intubations are performed by two experienced fully boarded anesthesiologists.
The design of the study is prospective and randomised.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Anticipated)
200
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Essen, Germany, 45136
- Recruiting
- Prof. Dr. Harald Groeben
-
Contact:
- Harald Groeben, M.D.
- Phone Number: ##49 201 174 31109
- Email: h.groeben@kliniken-essen-mitte.de
-
Principal Investigator:
- Harald Groeben, M.D.
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Scheduled for nasal intubation
- Adult
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age under 18 years
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: SINGLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1. Airtraq
Intubation with the use of the Airtraq technique
|
Intubation with the use of the Airtraq technique
Other Names:
|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 2. MacIntosh
Intubation using the standard MacIntosh blade
|
Intubation using the standard MacIntosh blade
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Time for intubation
Time Frame: 10 month
|
10 month
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
---|---|
Success rate for intubation
Time Frame: 10 month
|
10 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
February 1, 2009
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
November 1, 2009
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
November 1, 2009
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 11, 2009
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 18, 2009
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
February 19, 2009
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
February 19, 2009
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 18, 2009
Last Verified
February 1, 2009
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- Airtraqnasal2009
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Tracheal Intubation
-
University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire...Oxford University Hospitals NHS TrustCompletedIntubation;Difficult | Tracheal IntubationUnited Kingdom
-
The Hospital for Sick ChildrenWithdrawn
-
Hopital FochTerminated
-
Hopital FochCompletedTracheal IntubationFrance
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoCompletedTracheal IntubationUnited States
-
Ann & Robert H Lurie Children's Hospital of ChicagoUnknownTracheal Intubation
-
University Hospital of PatrasCompletedTracheal IntubationGreece
-
CHU de ReimsVerathonCompletedTracheal IntubationFrance
-
Hopital FochTerminated
-
NHS TaysideCompletedTracheal IntubationUnited Kingdom
Clinical Trials on Airtraq
-
Kocaeli UniversityCompleted
-
National University Hospital, SingaporeCompletedAnaesthesiaSingapore
-
Manuel Ángel Gómez-RíosCompletedNasotracheal IntubationSpain
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteCompleted
-
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation...Oxford University Hospitals NHS TrustCompletedChildren | Intubation | General AnesthesiaUnited Kingdom
-
Kocaeli UniversityCompletedNasotracheal IntubationTurkey
-
Kocaeli UniversityNot yet recruitingObesity, Morbid | Intubation; Difficult or Failed | Men | Video Laryngoscope
-
Kocaeli UniversityCompletedIntubation Difficult
-
Medical University of LodzCompleted
-
Kocaeli UniversityCompletedComparison of Two Different Videolaryngoscopes Regarding Hemodynamic Parameters in Open Heart SurgeyIntubation;Difficult | Coronary BypassTurkey