- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00884065
Effectiveness of Diacutaneous Fibrolysis in Painful Shoulder
Effectiveness of Diacutaneous Fibrolysis on Pain and Mobility in Patients Suffering From Painful Shoulder. A Randomized Pilot Study.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background and objectives:
Diacutaneous fibrolysis (DF) is a manual technique to treat the mechanical pain of the musculoskeletal system. While this technique has achieved promising results empirically, its effectiveness has not been tested in clinical trials. We aimed at evaluating the effectiveness of a single session of DF on pain and mobility in patients suffering from painful shoulder.
Subjects and methods:
This clinical trial took place in two public Primary Health Care Centres. Fifty patients were randomly allocated to two groups: the intervention group, who received a real DF session, and the control group, who received a placebo DF session. The degree of active mobility (flexion, abduction, extension, external and internal rotation), the pain in the hand behind back position and the participant's perception of the technique in terms of comfort and results obtained were measured.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Barcelona
-
Cornella de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain, 08940
- Catalan Institute of Health - Servei de Rhb Sant Ildefons
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- over 18 years of age
- being referred for treatment of painful shoulder (except for adhesive capsulitis)
- not having been previously treated with DF
Exclusion Criteria:
- Damaged skin and/or cutaneous lesions in the shoulder area
- History of shoulder surgery
- Vascular abnormalities
- Platelet antiaggregant therapy
- Acute inflammatory condition of the shoulder (<1 week)
- Patients with a pending litigation or court claim
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Intervention Group
The intervention group was treated with a single session of DF following the procedure as described by the authors.
|
The implementation of the technique consists of three consecutive stages: The first stage involves manual palpation, which is carried out by the hand that is not holding the hook, with the objective to find the area to be treated; the second, or instrumental palpation stage, is carried out by introducing the spatula of the hook together with the index finger of the palpatory hand to locate with precision the adherent connective fibers or fibrous corpuscles; the third, or fibrolysis stage, is the actual treatment.
Here, a brief supplementary traction is carried out with the hook.
Other Names:
|
Placebo Comparator: Control Group
The control group was treated with a single placebo session of DF.
|
The placebo was designed for this study and the stages of manual and instrumental palpation occur strictly at a superficial level.
In the third stage, instead of fibrolysis a pinch of skin is hold with the thumb of the palpatory hand and the tip of the spatula, so that the patient feels the hook distinctly but without any action taking place on the deep tissular planes.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Active Flexion Movement After Intervention Minus Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and the same day (just after intervention)
|
A universal double armed goniometer was used to measure change in active flexión movement in the sagital plane with the elbow fully extended and the forearm in indifferent pronosupination (thumb forward)
|
Baseline and the same day (just after intervention)
|
Change in Active Abduction Movement After Intervention Minus Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and the same day (just after intervention)
|
A universal double armed goniometer was used to measure change in active abduction movement in the scapular plane with the elbow in extension and the forearm in supination
|
Baseline and the same day (just after intervention)
|
Change in Active extensión Movement After Intervention Minus Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and the same day (just after intervention)
|
A universal double armed goniometer was used to measure change in active extensión movement in the sagital plane with the elbow fully extended and the forearm in indifferent pronosupination (thumb forward)
|
Baseline and the same day (just after intervention)
|
Change in Active External Rotation After Intervention Minus Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and the same day (just after intervention)
|
A universal double armed goniometer was used to measure change in active external rotation measured in the neutral position of the shoulder (arm pinned to the trunk), elbow flexed to 90º and the forearm in indifferent pronosupination (thumb forward)
|
Baseline and the same day (just after intervention)
|
Change in Active Internal Rotation After Intervention Minus Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and the same day (just after intervention)
|
Change in active internal rotation was measured with the hand behind back test.
The position achieved by the tip of the thumb was marked and with a flexible metric tape (always the same) the distance in centimetres between this mark and the inferior tip of the spinous process of C7 was measured; the shorter the distance, the better the mobility
|
Baseline and the same day (just after intervention)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Change in Pain in the Hand Behind Back Position After Intervention Minus Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline and the same day (just after intervention)
|
An unmarked Visual Analogue Scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain) millimeters was used.
At baseline, participants registered the pain perceived in the position used to measure the internal rotation.
After intervention, they registered the pain with the hand placed in the same position taking as a reference the mark in the first evaluation.
|
Baseline and the same day (just after intervention)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Martín-Eusebio Barra-López, PT, Catalan Institute of Health
- Principal Investigator: Carlos López-de-Celis, DO, PT, Catalan Institute of Health
- Principal Investigator: Gabriela Fernández-Jentsch, PT, Galician Health Service
- Principal Investigator: Ernesto Murillo-Barrios, PT, Galician Health Service
- Principal Investigator: Edurne Villar-Mateo, PT, Catalan Institute of Health
- Principal Investigator: Laura Raya-de-Cardenas, PT, Catalan Institute of Health
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Idiap08/187
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Shoulder Pain
-
Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation SciencesRecruitingShoulder Injuries | Shoulder Capsulitis | Shoulder Arthritis | Shoulder Impingement | Shoulder Bursitis | Shoulder Pain ChronicPakistan
-
University of Southern DenmarkRegion of Southern Denmark; The Danish Rheumatism Association; Esbjerg Municipality and other collaboratorsCompletedHypermobility Syndrome Shoulder | Shoulder Pain Chronic | Shoulder LuxationDenmark
-
Şeyhmus KAPLANCompletedSubacromial Impingement | Pain, Shoulder
-
Oslo University HospitalUnknownShoulder Impingement Syndrome | Subacromial Shoulder PainNorway
-
Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)Istanbul Aydın UniversityCompletedPain, Shoulder | Myofacial Pain | Adhesion; ShoulderTurkey
-
Mohamed R El TahanCompletedUnilateral Chronic Shoulder Pain | Bilateral Chronic Shoulder PainEgypt
-
Hasan Kalyoncu UniversityHacettepe UniversityCompletedShoulder Pain | Shoulder Injury | Shoulder ImpingementTurkey
-
Helping Hand Institute of Rehabilitation SciencesCompletedShoulder Injuries | Shoulder Pain | Shoulder Capsulitis | Frozen Shoulder | Shoulder ImpingementPakistan
-
Makassed General HospitalRecruiting
-
Zagazig UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Diacutaneous Fibrolysis
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaUnknownMyofascial Pain Syndrome | ContractionSpain
-
Universidad de ZaragozaCompleted
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaRecruitingHamstring ContracturesSpain
-
Universidad de ZaragozaCompletedCarpal Tunnel Syndrome | Ultrasonography | Physical Therapy ModalitiesSpain
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaRecruiting
-
Jordi Gol i Gurina FoundationUnknown
-
Jordi Gol i Gurina FoundationCompleted
-
Universitat Internacional de CatalunyaNot yet recruitingPlantar Fascitis | Heel Pain SyndromeSpain
-
Universidad de ZaragozaCompletedShoulder Pain | Athletic Injuries | Dry Needling | Diacutaneous FibrolysisSpain
-
Sara Cabanillas BareaCompletedTension-Type Headache