Confirmatory Study of OPC-12759 Ophthalmic Suspension

November 18, 2013 updated by: Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

Confirmatory Study of OPC-12759 Ophthalmic Suspension in Dry Eye Patients

The purpose of this study is to verify whether OPC-12759 ophthalmic suspension is effective compared with active control in dry eye patients.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

188

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kagoshima, Japan
        • Kyushu region
      • Matsuyama, Japan
        • Chushikoku region
      • Nagoya, Japan
        • Tokai region
      • Osaka, Japan
        • Kansai Region
      • Tokyo, Japan
        • Kanto region

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Out patient
  2. Subjective complaint of dry eye that has been present for minimum 20 months
  3. Ocular discomfort severity is moderate to severe
  4. Corneal - conjunctival damage is moderate to severe
  5. Unanesthetized Schirmer's test score of 5mm/5minutes or less
  6. Best corrected visual acuity of 0.2 or better in both eyes

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of anterior segment disease or disorder other than that associated with keratoconjunctivitis sicca
  2. Ocular hypertension patient or glaucoma patient with ophthalmic solution
  3. Anticipated use of any topically-instilled ocular medications or patients who cannot discontinue the use during the study
  4. Anticipated use of contact lens during the study
  5. Patient with punctal plug
  6. Any history of ocular surgery within 12 months
  7. Female patients who are pregnant,possibly pregnant or breast feeding
  8. Known hypersensitivity to any component of the study drug or procedural medications
  9. Receipt of any investigational product within 4 months.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Rebamipide
Instillation,4 times/day for 4 weeks
OPC-12759 Ophthalmic suspension 2%
Active Comparator: Hyaluronate
Instillation,6 times/day for 4 weeks
Hyalein Mini Ophthalmic solution 0.1%

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Fluorescein Corneal Staining (FCS) Score From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks4
FCS indicates the damage to the corneal epithelium. Per the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop report, the cornea was divided into 5 fractions, each of which was given a staining score from 0 to 3, and the total score was calculated (0-15). 0 is better. Noninferiority for change from baseline in the FCS score (LOCF) was determined by comparing the noninferiority margin (0.4) with the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) of the difference between the 2 treatment groups
Baseline, Weeks4
Change in Lissamine Green Conjunctival Staining (LGCS) Score From Baseline
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks4
LGCS indicates the damage to the conjunctival epithelium. Per the National Eye Institute/Industry Workshop report, the conjunctiva was divided into 6 fractions, each of which was given a staining sdore from 0 to 3, and the total score was calculated (0-18). 0 is better. Superiority was verified by comparing t-test results for change from baseline in the LGCS score (LOCF) between 2 treatment groups.
Baseline, Weeks4

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 19, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 20, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

April 21, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 12, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye Syndromes

Clinical Trials on OPC-12759 Ophthalmic suspension

3
Subscribe