A Study Evaluating the Efficacy of SAR 1118 (0.1%, 1.0%, 5.0%) Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Dry Eye Conducted in a Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE)

August 5, 2021 updated by: Shire

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Masked and Placebo-Controlled Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Three Different Concentrations (0.1%, 1.0%, 5.0%) of SAR 1118 Ophthalmic Solution in Subjects With Dry Eye Using the Controlled Adverse Environment (CAE) Model

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of three different concentrations (0.1%, 1.0%, 5.0%) of SAR 1118 Ophthalmic Solution compared to placebo in the treatment of dry eye.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

230

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Connecticut
      • Waterbury, Connecticut, United States, 06708
        • The Eye Care Group
    • Maine
      • Lewiston, Maine, United States, 04243
        • Central Maine Eye Care
    • Massachusetts
      • Andover, Massachusetts, United States, 01840
        • Ora, Inc. (two locations)
    • North Carolina
      • Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, 28204
        • Mundorf Eye Center
    • Tennessee
      • Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38119
        • Total Eye Care, P.A.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed Informed Consent Form and HIPAA document
  • Willing and able to comply with all study procedures
  • Be at least 18 years of age
  • Patient-reported history of dry eye in both eyes
  • Demonstrate a positive response when exposed to the Controlled Adverse Environment model
  • A negative urine pregnancy test if female of childbearing potential and must use adequate birth control throughout the study period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any ocular condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, could affect study parameters including, but not limited to, active ocular infection, ocular inflammation, glaucoma, and/or diabetic retinopathy
  • Unwilling to avoid wearing contact lenses for 7 days prior to and for duration of the study period
  • Any blood donation or significant loss of blood within 56 days of Visit 1
  • Any history of immunodeficiency disorder, positive HIV, hepatitis B, C, or evidence of acute active hepatitis A (anti-HAV IgM), or organ or bone marrow transplant.
  • Use of any topical ophthalmic preparations (including tear substitutes) 72 hrs prior to screening assessments and through the entire study period
  • Any significant illness that could interfere with study parameters
  • History of laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) or similar type of corneal refractive surgery within 12 months prior to Visit 1, and/or any other ocular surgical procedure within 12 months prior to Visit 1; or any scheduled ocular surgical procedure during the study period.
  • Known history of alcohol and/or drug abuse

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: TRIPLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: 5.0% Lifitegrast
Lifitegrast
Ophthalmic Solution
Other Names:
  • SAR 1118
PLACEBO_COMPARATOR: Placebo
Placebo Ophthalmic Solution
Ophthalmic Solution
EXPERIMENTAL: 0.1% Lifitegrast
Lifitegrast
Ophthalmic Solution
Other Names:
  • SAR 1118
EXPERIMENTAL: 1.0% Lifitegrast
Lifitegrast
Ophthalmic Solution
Other Names:
  • SAR 1118

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inferior Corneal Fluorescein Staining Score in Pre-Controlled Adverse Environment at Day 84
Time Frame: Day 84
Corneal staining was performed to grade the degree of corneal epithelial cell injury as measured by fluorescence using slit-lamp examination. The staining was graded with the Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc. (ORA) scale. The corneal surface is divided into three regions: superior, central and inferior. The scores for each of these 3 regions ranged from 0 to 4 (0=no staining; 1=occasional; 2=countable; 3=uncountable, but not confluent; 4=confluent) with 0.5 point increments, and lower score indicates a better outcome. Inferior corneal fluorescein staining scores from the study eye only were reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse (higher) score at baseline.
Day 84

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Inferior Corneal Staining Score Change From Baseline (CFB) to Day 84
Time Frame: Baseline (Day 0) and Day 84
Corneal staining was performed to grade the degree of corneal epithelial cell injury as measured by fluorescence using slit-lamp examination. The staining was graded with the Ophthalmic Research Associates, Inc. (ORA) scale. The corneal surface is divided into three regions: superior, central and inferior. The scores for each of these 3 regions ranged from 0 to 4 (0=no staining; 1=occasional; 2=countable; 3=uncountable, but not confluent; 4=confluent) with 0.5 point increments, and lower score indicates a better outcome. Inferior corneal fluorescein staining scores from the study eye only were reported. Study eye is the 'worse eye', defined as the eye with worse (higher) score at baseline.
Baseline (Day 0) and Day 84

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

August 3, 2009

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

February 18, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

February 18, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 20, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 22, 2009

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

June 23, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

August 9, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 5, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Dry Eye

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe