Improvement of a Physically Active Lifestyle (FaBA)

November 13, 2012 updated by: Freie Universität Berlin

Improvement of a Physically Active Lifestyle in Orthopedic and Cardiologic Rehabilitation Patients With an Expert System

To help rehabilitation patients to adopt and maintain a physically active lifestyle, it is imperative to increase self-management competencies. Aim of this research project is to evaluate an evidence- and theory-based computerized expert system in comparison to a well established standard program and a questionnaire-only group. Rehabilitation patients will be treated psychologically and followed up over 18 months. The computerized expert system is expected to help patients better than the standard program. Both interventions are hypothesized to improve self-management competencies over and above the rehabilitation treatment (i.e., questionnaire-only group).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

An experimental study with three groups is planned over a time period of 18 months. Patients in the intervention group receive an interactive, computerized expert system (Intervention Group, IG). Patients in the Active Control Group (ACG) get an interactive computerized standard program. This standard program has already been proven to be effective but which does not tailor treatment components to the individual needs of the patients. Patients in the Passive Control Group (PCG) are asked to answer the questionnaires only. Rehabilitation patients (N = 1000) will be recruited in three rehabilitation clinics and followed up over six measurement points: t1 and t2 with computer interventions during their rehabilitation stay; t3 and t4 with booster-sessions via telephone (6 weeks and 6 months after admission from rehabilitation). Furthermore, patients will be contacted at t5 per mail with motivational material (12 months after admission) and at t6 again per mail (only questionnaire, 18 months after admission).

The hypotheses are: In comparison to the PCG, both the IG and the ACG are expected to have a higher motivation, to adopt a healthy lifestyle, to perform more health behavior and to be less likely to relapse into previous unhealthy routines. Also, IG and ACG will be healthier as well as they will report more quality of life and rehabilitation satisfaction. In comparison to ACG, the IG is hypothesized to be more effective than the ACG regarding motivation, behavior and social-cognitive predictors of behavior. Moreover, the interventions (ACG and IG) are supposed to be equally effective for cardiac and orthopedic, as well as out-patient and stationary treated rehabilitation patients. After successful evaluation and some adoptions the intervention will be implemented as a self-help program in all eligible rehabilitation clinics and in the internet.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1377

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Berlin, Germany, 14195
        • Freie Universitaet Berlin

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • to be capable of exercising on their own at the minimum level recommended by the according rehabilitation clinic
  • able to fill out a questionnaire (no illiteracy)
  • adequate German language ability

Exclusion Criteria:

  • the participant not be of age
  • severe cognitive deficits
  • visual impairments (patients have to read at the PC)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention Group (IG)
Patients in the IG will receive an interactive, computerized expert system which tailors treatment components to the individual needs of the patients
patients will receive an interactive, computerized expert system which tailors treatment components to the individual needs of the patients
Other Names:
  • FaBA
Placebo Comparator: Active Control Group (ACG)
Patients in the ACG will get an interactive computerized standard program which has been proven to be effective (Göhner, & Fuchs, 2007) Göhner, W. & Fuchs, R. (2007). Änderung des Gesundheitsverhaltens. MoVo-Gruppenprogramme für körperliche Aktivität und gesunde Ernährung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
Patients in the ACG will get an interactive computerized standard program which has been proven to be effective (Göhner, W. & Fuchs, R. (2007). Änderung des Gesundheitsverhaltens. MoVo-Gruppenprogramme für körperliche Aktivität und gesunde Ernährung. Göttingen: Hogrefe.)
Other Names:
  • MoVo
No Intervention: Passive Control Group (PCG)
patients are asked to answer the questionnaires only

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
physical activity
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
subjective health
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
quality of life
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
rehabilitation satisfaction
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
motivation
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
social-cognitive predictors of behavior (self-efficacy, action control etc.)
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sonia Lippke, PhD, Freie Universitaet Berlin

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

September 18, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 15, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2012

Last Verified

January 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Heart Diseases

Clinical Trials on Intervention Group (IG)

3
Subscribe