Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting Stent vs Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With DIABETES Mellitus (ESSENCE-DM)

December 12, 2016 updated by: Seung-Jung Park

Randomized Comparison of Everolimus- Eluting Stent Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation for De Novo Coronary Artery DisEase in Patients With DIABETES Mellitus

The purpose of this study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of coronary stenting with the Everolimus- Eluting stent compared to the Sirolimus-Eluting stent in the treatment of de novo coronary stenosis in patients with diabetic patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Diabetic patients often present unfavorable coronary anatomy with small and diffusely diseased vessels (1) and exhibit exaggerated neointimal hyperplasia after bare-metal stent (BMS) implantation as compared with nondiabetics (2). Although drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation significantly reduced the neointimal hyperplasia and angiographic restenosis compared to BMS in diabetic patients (3), presence of diabetes mellitus (DM) have been still associated with an increased risk of restenosis and unfavorable clinical outcomes in the era of DES (4,5). Recently, the relative efficacies of sirolimua-eluting stent (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in patients with DM have been evaluated in randomized and registry studies (6-10). The present study, ESSENCE-DIABETES Study, compare 8-month angiographic and 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with diabetes mellitus treated with sirolimus-eluting stent (CYPHER) or everolimus-eluting stent (XIENCE V)

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

300

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Bucheon, Korea, Republic of
        • SoonChunHyang University Bucheon Hospital
      • Busan, Korea, Republic of
        • Busan Saint Mary's Hospital
      • Cheonan, Korea, Republic of
        • Soonchunhyang University Cheonan Hospital
      • Cheongju, Korea, Republic of
        • Cheongju Saint Mary's Hospital
      • Chuncheon, Korea, Republic of
        • Kangwon University Hospital
      • Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
        • Chungnam National University Hospital
      • Daejeon, Korea, Republic of
        • Daejeon St Mary's Hospital Catholic University
      • GangNeung, Korea, Republic of
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Jeonju, Korea, Republic of
        • Chonbuk National University Hospital
      • Jinju, Korea, Republic of
        • Kyungsang University Hospital
      • Pusan, Korea, Republic of
        • Inje University Pusan Paik Hospital
      • Pusan, Korea, Republic of
        • Pusan Natioanal University Hospital
      • PyeongChon, Korea, Republic of
        • Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Asan Medical Center
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • SoonChunHyang University Seoul Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital
      • Seoul, Korea, Republic of
        • Korea Veterans Hospital
      • Ulsan, Korea, Republic of
        • Ulsan University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diabetic patients with angina and documented ischemia or patients with documented silent ischemia
  • Patients who are eligible for intracoronary stenting
  • Age >18 years, <75 ages
  • De novo lesion
  • Percent diameter stenosis ≥50%
  • Reference vessel size ≥ 2.5 mm by visual estimation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy
  • Pregnant state
  • Known hypersensitivity or contra-indication to contrast agent and heparin
  • Limited life-expectancy (less than 1 year)
  • Acute ST elevation myocardial infarction on admission
  • Characteristics of lesion

    1. Left main disease
    2. In-stent restenosis
    3. Graft vessels
  • Hematological disease (Neutropenia <3000/mm3, Thrombocytopenia <100,000/mm3)
  • Hepatic dysfunction, liver enzyme (ALT and AST) elevation ≥ 3 times normal
  • Renal dysfunction, creatinine ≥ 2.0mg/dL
  • Contraindication to aspirin, clopidogrel or cilostazol
  • Left ventricular ejection fraction <30%
  • Patients who are actively participating in another drug or device investigational study, which have not completed the primary endpoint follow-up period.
  • Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy <1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: XIENCE V
everolimus-eluting stent
everolimus-eluting stent
Other Names:
  • Xience V stent
Active Comparator: CYPHER
Using Cypher stent
sirolimus-eluting stent
Other Names:
  • Cypher elect stent

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Angiographic in-segment late loss at angiography
Time Frame: 8-month
8-month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cardiac death
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
All-cause Death
Time Frame: 12 month
12 month
All-cause Death
Time Frame: 5 year
5 year
Cardiac death
Time Frame: 5 year
5 year
Myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 5 year
5 year
Target vessel revascularization (all and ischemia-driven)
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Target lesion revascularization (all and ischemia-driven)
Time Frame: 5 year
5 year
Stent thrombosis by definition of Academic Research Consortium (ARC)
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Stent thrombosis by definition of Academic Research Consortium (ARC)
Time Frame: 5 year
5 year
Binary restenosis in both in-stent and in-segment
Time Frame: 8 months
8 months
Angiographic pattern of restenosis
Time Frame: 8 months
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 18, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 18, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

October 19, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 13, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2016

Last Verified

December 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

This is not a publicly funded trial.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on XIENCE V

3
Subscribe