The Effect of a Pre- and Postoperative Orthogeriatric Service

May 15, 2013 updated by: Ullevaal University Hospital

The Effect of a Pre- and Postoperative Orthogeriatric Service. A Randomised, Controlled Trial

The investigators' aim is to assess the effect of a model of preoperative as well as early postoperative care, treatment and rehabilitation in a dedicated orthogeriatric ward in a single-blind randomised study.

The investigators' main hypothesis is that an orthogeriatric service may improve long-time cognitive outcome.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The study will be carried out in close cooperation between the Orthopaedic Centre and the Department of Geriatric Medicine. The patients will be randomized in the Emergency Department in accordance with procedures already established for a recently finished trial. The intervention group will be transferred as soon as possible to the orthogeriatric ward, stabilised there preoperatively, and transferred back to the same ward postoperatively for further treatment and rehabilitation, while the control group will be treated in a traditional orthopaedic ward. Operative and anaesthesiologic procedures will be the same in the two groups.

The primary endpoint is chosen in order to optimize clinical relevance as well as sensitivity to change within a wide range of functional performance, and will be recorded four months after the fracture. Our main hypothesis is that an orthogeriatric service may improve long-time cognitive outcome. Accordingly, we will use a composite endpoint tapping cognitive functioning in the lower as well as the higher spectre of performance by these two instruments:

  • Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR), proxy-based scale for severity of dementia, that is able to detect differences also between patients with severe dementia. The scale consists of six questions, each rated 0-3, adding up to a sumscore of 0-18 ("sum of boxes"). The scale is frequently used in dementia treatment trials, and is shown to be valid and reliable. CDR will be scored based on the best available source (relative, staff in nursing home or home nursing service)
  • The 10 words memory task from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease battery (CERAD). This test is shown to be sensitive for memory changes in persons that have a good or fairly good cognitive functioning. We will use the immediate recall and the delayed recall parts of this task, i.e. two scales.

The primary endpoint will be assessed after four months, by a specially trained research assistant blinded to allocation. The patients will be re-assessed after 12 months.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

332

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 0407 OSLO
        • Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Eligible patients will be admitted acutely for a femoral neck fracture, a trochanteric or a subtrochanteric femoral fracture.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hip fracture as part of multi-trauma or high energy trauma (defined as a fall from a higher level than 1 metre). One recent fracture in addition to the hip fracture (e.g. radius or shoulder) is acceptable.
  • Regarded as moribund at admittance.
  • Absence of a valid informed consent or assent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
We will use a composite endpoint by these two instruments: Clinical Dementia Rating Scale (CDR), and the 10 words memory task from the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease battery (CERAD)
Time Frame: 4 and 12 months
4 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Activities of Daily Living (ADL) Scale
Time Frame: 4 and 12 months
4 and 12 months
Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) scale
Time Frame: 4 and 12 months
4 and 12 months
Intrahospital mortality
Time Frame: 4 and 12 months
4 and 12 months
Cumulative mortality
Time Frame: 4 and 12 months
4 and 12 months
The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) scale
Time Frame: 4 and 12 months
4 and 12 months
Pre-/postoperative delirium
Time Frame: 4 and 12 months
4 and 12 months
Duration/Severity of delirium
Time Frame: 4 and 12 months
4 and 12 months
Other complications
Time Frame: 4 and 12 months
4 and 12 months
Incidence of dementia 12 months postoperatively
Time Frame: 4 and 12 months
4 and 12 months
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: 4 and 12 months
4 and 12 months
Markers of bone turnover
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months
Micronutrients in blood
Time Frame: 4 months
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Torgeir Bruun Wyller, MD, Prof., University of Oslo, Fac of Med., Geriatric dep.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 5, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

November 6, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 16, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 15, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Delirium

Clinical Trials on Orthogeriatric intervention

3
Subscribe