Efficacy of Two Liquid Oxygen Devices in Deambulation

August 29, 2013 updated by: Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau
Some oxygen conserving devices have been developed to diminish oxygen expense. These devices offer optimisation of oxygen therapy for deambulation by improving time autonomy of patients.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Spain
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08025
        • Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with arterial oxygen desaturation to effort.
  • COPD with TLC > 90%
  • EPID with TLC < 90% and FEV1/FVC > 70%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT) in deambulation.
  • Not clinically stable during last month.
  • Smokers

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who show arterial oxygen desaturation to effort.
Device: Oxygen conserving devices
Three 6MWT test will be performed at random with conventional oxygen continuous-flow,by Oxymizer Pendant and demand valve system. The percentage of patients correcting their desaturation and patients' acceptance of every method will be determinated.
Other Names:
  • Oxygen conserving devices in COPD.
Device: Oxygen conserving devices
Three 6MWT test will be performed at random with conventional oxygen continuous-flow,by Oxymizer Pendant and demand valve system. The percentage of patients correcting their desaturation and patients' acceptance of every method will be determinated
Other Names:
  • Oxygen conserving devices in interstitial lung disease.
Experimental: 2
Patients with interstitial lung disease who show arterial oxygen desaturation to effort
Device: Oxygen conserving devices
Three 6MWT test will be performed at random with conventional oxygen continuous-flow,by Oxymizer Pendant and demand valve system. The percentage of patients correcting their desaturation and patients' acceptance of every method will be determinated.
Other Names:
  • Oxygen conserving devices in COPD.
Device: Oxygen conserving devices
Three 6MWT test will be performed at random with conventional oxygen continuous-flow,by Oxymizer Pendant and demand valve system. The percentage of patients correcting their desaturation and patients' acceptance of every method will be determinated
Other Names:
  • Oxygen conserving devices in interstitial lung disease.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
To determine the efficacy of correcting desaturation during effort and the acceptance of two different oxygen conserving devices during deambulation,one system with reservoir an another one with oxygen demand valve.
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Fundació Institut de Recerca de l'Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sergi Marti, Doctor, H.Vall d'Hebron

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 3, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 12, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

March 15, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 07/060/793

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe