- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05724758
Patient Reported Outcomes After Oncoplastic Breast Conserving Surgery
The goal of this study is to assess patient satisfaction after oncoplastic breast conserving surgery. With the help of a breast-questionnaire the patient satisfaction will be assessed before the surgery and 4 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after the operation. The main question it aims to answer are: Does breast conserving surgery improve quality of life.
type of study: cohort study, observational
OCBS = oncoplastic breast conserving surgery BCT = breast conserving therapy DCIS = ductal carcinoma in situ
participant population/health conditions
- Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer, that can be treated breast conserving
- the participants have to be at least 18 years old
Participants will fill out a questionnaire pre surgery, 4 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after the surgery. The individual questionnaires will be compared.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
The management of breast cancer has undergone a significant shift over the last century. The advances in systemic therapy have not only improved the overall prognosis however also allowed for less radical surgery and more breast conservable efforts. The term oncoplastic breast conserving surgery was first coined in the early 90s where breast cancer surgery was performed while incorporating plastic surgical techniques. Therefore, this enabled the preservation of the natural breast shape with good aesthetic outcomes. Over the years oncoplastic breast conserving surgery has become widely accepted and adopted into routine clinical practice by most breast cancer surgeons. The oncological safety surrounding oncoplastic breast conserving surgery have been well established. Rates of positive surgical margins and re-excision rates have been shown to be similar to traditional lumpectomy operations. Complication rates are also comparable and oncoplastic breast conserving surgery does not result in delays in adjuvant treatments. However, many surgeons would concur that the most significant benefit of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OBCS) is patient satisfaction and the potential improvement in their quality of life.
Patient reported outcomes (PROMs) allow us to objectively assess patient satisfaction and the impact the intervention has had onto their lives. Incorporating PROMs into daily clinical practice would not only facilitate shared-decision making but also allow us to tailor clinical management to suit individual patient needs. This study however also aims to assess the patient reported outcome after breast surgery and in the follow up time (after radiotherapy, ...).
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Kavitha Däster, Dr. med.
- Phone Number: +41 44 533 81 00
- Email: kavitha.daester@brust-zentrum.ch
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Giada Schaber, Med. cand.
- Phone Number: +41 76 346 05 26
- Email: giada.schaber@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- BCT oncoplastic surgery technique
- Women > 18 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previously treated ipsilateral breast cancer or DCIS
- Severe psychological illness by doctors' discretion (as taking part in a study could increase anxiety) or severe dementia, that stops them to consent to the procedure
- Pregnant women
- Distant metastatic disease (M1)
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change of patient satisfaction with their breasts pre- and post breast-conserving surgery
Time Frame: before the surgery and 4 weeks after the surgery
|
To assess patient satisfaction using BREAST-Q over the duration of the breast cancer clinical management and follow up i.e., pre-, and postoperative: 4 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after the surgery.
|
before the surgery and 4 weeks after the surgery
|
|
Change of quality of Life pre- and post breast-conserving surgery
Time Frame: before the surgery and 4 weeks after the surgery
|
To assess Quality of Life using BREAST-Q over the duration of the breast cancer clinical management and follow up i.e., pre-, and postoperative: 4 weeks, 6 months and 1 year after the surgery.
|
before the surgery and 4 weeks after the surgery
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
impact of age (>70 and < 60 years old) on Patient reported outcome measures
Time Frame: baseline and 4 weeks postoperative
|
To assess the impact of age (> 70 and < 60 years old) on patient reported outcome measures (validated questionnaire) after oncoplastic surgery, If age has an impact on patient satisfaction with their breasts pre and post surgery
|
baseline and 4 weeks postoperative
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Pusic AL, Klassen AF, Scott AM, Klok JA, Cordeiro PG, Cano SJ. Development of a new patient-reported outcome measure for breast surgery: the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Aug;124(2):345-353. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aee807.
- World Medical Association. World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA. 2013 Nov 27;310(20):2191-4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281053. No abstract available.
- Freites-Martinez A, Santana N, Arias-Santiago S, Viera A. Using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE - Version 5.0) to Evaluate the Severity of Adverse Events of Anticancer Therapies. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2021 Jan;112(1):90-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ad.2019.05.009. Epub 2020 Sep 3. No abstract available. English, Spanish.
- Weigelt E, Scherb H. [Data protection and data access (I): federal data protection law and the social welfare code with reference to carrying out occupational medicine epidemiologic studies in Germany]. Gesundheitswesen. 1992 Nov;54(11):666-72. German.
- McIntosh J, O'Donoghue JM. Therapeutic mammaplasty--a systematic review of the evidence. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar;38(3):196-202. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.004. Epub 2011 Dec 27.
- Carter SA, Lyons GR, Kuerer HM, Bassett RL Jr, Oates S, Thompson A, Caudle AS, Mittendorf EA, Bedrosian I, Lucci A, DeSnyder SM, Babiera G, Yi M, Baumann DP, Clemens MW, Garvey PB, Hunt KK, Hwang RF. Operative and Oncologic Outcomes in 9861 Patients with Operable Breast Cancer: Single-Institution Analysis of Breast Conservation with Oncoplastic Reconstruction. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3190-8. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5407-9. Epub 2016 Jul 12.
- Rose M, Manjer J, Ringberg A, Svensson H. Surgical strategy, methods of reconstruction, surgical margins and postoperative complications in oncoplastic breast surgery. Eur J Plast Surg. 2014;37(4):205-214. doi: 10.1007/s00238-013-0922-4. Epub 2014 Feb 1.
- Kaviani A, Sodagari N, Sheikhbahaei S, Eslami V, Hafezi-Nejad N, Safavi A, Noparast M, Fitoussi A. From radical mastectomy to breast-conserving therapy and oncoplastic breast surgery: a narrative review comparing oncological result, cosmetic outcome, quality of life, and health economy. ISRN Oncol. 2013 Sep 12;2013:742462. doi: 10.1155/2013/742462.
- Wijgman DJ, Ten Wolde B, van Groesen NR, Keemers-Gels ME, van den Wildenberg FJ, Strobbe LJ. Short term safety of oncoplastic breast conserving surgery for larger tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Apr;43(4):665-671. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.021. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
- Nizet JL, Maweja S, Lakosi F, Lifrange E, Scagnol I, Seidel L, Albert A, Jerusalem G. Oncological and surgical outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery. Acta Chir Belg. 2015 Jan-Feb;115:33-41.
- Cil TD, Cordeiro E. Complications of Oncoplastic Breast Surgery Involving Soft Tissue Transfer Versus Breast-Conserving Surgery: An Analysis of the NSQIP Database. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Oct;23(10):3266-71. doi: 10.1245/s10434-016-5477-8. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
- Klit A, Tvedskov TF, Kroman N, Elberg JJ, Ejlertsen B, Henriksen TF. Oncoplastic breast surgery does not delay the onset of adjuvant chemotherapy: a population-based study. Acta Oncol. 2017 May;56(5):719-723. doi: 10.1080/0284186X.2017.1281437. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
- Rose M, Svensson H, Handler J, Hoyer U, Ringberg A, Manjer J. Patient-reported outcome after oncoplastic breast surgery compared with conventional breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2020 Feb;180(1):247-256. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-05544-2. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
- Stolpner I, Heil J, Feisst M, Karsten MM, Weber WP, Blohmer JU, Forster T, Golatta M, Schutz F, Sohn C, Hennigs A. Clinical Validation of the BREAST-Q Breast-Conserving Therapy Module. Ann Surg Oncol. 2019 Sep;26(9):2759-2767. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07456-y. Epub 2019 May 21.
- Cordova LZ, Hunter-Smith DJ, Rozen WM. Patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following mastectomy with breast reconstruction or without reconstruction: a systematic review. Gland Surg. 2019 Aug;8(4):441-451. doi: 10.21037/gs.2019.07.02.
- Lagendijk M, van Egdom LSE, van Veen FEE, Vos EL, Mureau MAM, van Leeuwen N, Hazelzet JA, Lingsma HF, Koppert LB. Patient-Reported Outcome Measures May Add Value in Breast Cancer Surgery. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Nov;25(12):3563-3571. doi: 10.1245/s10434-018-6729-6. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
- Mundy LR, Homa K, Klassen AF, Pusic AL, Kerrigan CL. Breast Cancer and Reconstruction: Normative Data for Interpreting the BREAST-Q. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 May;139(5):1046e-1055e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003241.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ANTICIPATED)
Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Patient reported outcome
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer Stage I
-
Mayo ClinicNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedAnatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Prognostic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Prognostic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Prognostic Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Prognostic Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC...United States
-
M.D. Anderson Cancer CenterActive, not recruitingAnatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8 | Early Stage Triple-Negative Breast Carcinoma | Early Stage HER2-Positive Breast CarcinomaUnited States
-
University of WashingtonTerminatedBreast Cancer | Breast Cancer Stage I | Breast Cancer Stage II | Breast Cancer Stage III | Breast Cancer Stage IIB | Breast Cancer Stage IIA | Breast Cancer Stage IIIA | Breast Cancer Stage IIIB | Breast Cancer Stage IIIcUnited States
-
University of Southern CaliforniaNational Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage I Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast CancerUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedStage I Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast CancerUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterTerminatedStage I Breast Cancer | Cancer Survivor | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage IIIA Breast Cancer | Stage IIIB Breast Cancer | Stage IIIC Breast CancerUnited States
-
Thompson Cancer Survival CenterRecruitingBreast Cancer | Breast Cancer Stage I | Breast Cancer Stage II | Breast Cancer Stage IIIUnited States
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteCompletedEarly Stage Breast Cancer | Breast Cancer Stage I | Breast Cancer Stage IIUnited States
-
Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteCURE FoundationCompletedBreast Cancer Stage I | Breast Cancer Stage II | Breast Cancer Stage IIIUnited States
-
National Cancer Institute (NCI)CompletedBreast Cancer | Stage I Breast Cancer | Stage II Breast Cancer | Stage III Breast CancerUnited States
Clinical Trials on Breast-conserving surgery
-
Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruitingBreast Surgery | Breast CancerChina
-
Shandong Cancer Hospital and InstituteNot yet recruitingBreast Cancer Female | Patient Reported Outcome | Breast-conserving Surgery | Oncological Safety
-
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine,...Not yet recruiting
-
Hubei Cancer HospitalRecruitingGranulomatous Mastitis | Breast-conserving Plastic SurgeryChina
-
Hanyang University Seoul HospitalKorean Surgical Society; Korea Robot-Endoscopy Minimal Access Breast Surgery...CompletedBRCA1/2 Mutation | Breast-conserving SurgeryKorea, Republic of
-
Tampere University HospitalTurku University Hospital; Kuopio University Hospital; Jyväskylä Central HospitalActive, not recruitingQuality of Life | Breast Cancer | Patient Satisfaction | Multidisciplinary Communication | Resection Margin | Surgical MarginFinland
-
Du ZhengguiWest China Second University Hospital; Suzhou Municipal Hospital; Taiyuan Central... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruiting
-
Fudan UniversityThe First Affiliated Hospital with Nanjing Medical University; First People... and other collaboratorsRecruitingBreast Cancer | Breast Reconstruction | Patient Reported Outcome Measures | Oncoplastic Breast-conserving SurgeryChina
-
European Institute of OncologyCompleted
-
The Greater Poland Cancer CentreActive, not recruiting