How do Attitude About Pay for Performance Differ Among Different Anesthesia Care Provider and Over Time (P4P)

May 1, 2017 updated by: University of Oklahoma

How do Attitute About Pay for Performance Differ Among Different Anesthesia Care Provider and Over Time

The investigators hypothesize that common objections to P4P relate to potential loss of autonomy or concerns about adverse effects on patient care.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Attitude

Detailed Description

We seek to establish baseline attitudes about Pay for Performance (P4P) in the OUHSC Dept of Anesthesiology and determine what differences exist between faculty, CRNAs and residents. We plan to resurvey annually to determine if attitudes change as the department implements a P4P program. We hope that by understanding the attitudes of anesthesia care providers, we can alleviate their concerns. We hope to account for their concerns as we develop and modify our P4P program. We believe that acceptance of the general idea of P4P is important if individuals are to maintain job satisfaction.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

United States
- Oklahoma
  - Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
    - Univeristy of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center Dept. Anesthesiology
  - Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States, 73104
    - Univeristy of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

24 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

anesthesia care providers

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All anesthesia care providers in the department

Exclusion Criteria:

locum faculty members and CRNAs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Number of groups / cohorts

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Faculty; MD Full time Faculty members working with the Department
CRNAs Full time CRNAs working within the department
Residents Residents working within the department

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

University of Oklahoma

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2007

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2010

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

March 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 3, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 4, 2010

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

May 5, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 4, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2017

Last Verified