Comparison of Safety, Effectiveness and Quality of Life Outcomes Between Labeled Versus "Treat and Extend" Regimen in Turkish Patients With Choroidal Neovascularisation Due to Age-related Macular Degeneration (AMD) (SALUTE)

May 23, 2013 updated by: Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Comparison of Safety, Effectiveness, and Quality-of-life Outcomes Between Labeled Versus "Treat and Extend" Regimen in Turkish Patients With Choroidal Neovascularisation Due to AMD

The purpose of the study was to compare 2 treatment regimens for patients suffering from choroidal neovascularisation secondary to age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The first treatment regimen was the approved AMD treatment of 1 injection each month for 3 months and than re-treatment of patients who have a visual loss of more than 5 letters with monthly control (Treat and Observe). The second treatment regimen was 1 injection each month for 3 months and than extending the control period if the macula is dry during the monthly control (Treat and Extend). If the "Treat and Extend" regimen is found effective and safe, the number of ranibizumab injections, the number of patient visits, the risk of adverse events due to the intravitreal injections, and policlinic occupation number could all be reduced.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

99

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Adana, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Ankara, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigational Site
      • Bursa, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Eskişehir, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • Konya, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • İstanbul, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site
      • İzmir, Turkey
        • Novartis Investigative Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

50 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female patients over the age of 50.
  • Patients with primary, secondary, or recurrent subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) to AMD with classic, minimal classic, or occult lesions.
  • Patients with CNV area ≥ %50 of the total lesion.
  • Total lesion area ≤ 12 disc areas for minimal classic/occult lesions and ≤ 9 disc areas for the classic lesions.
  • Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) score between 73 and 34 letters in the study eye.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • BCVA < 34 letters.
  • Patients using anti-angiogenic drugs (pegaptanib, ranibizumab, anecortave acetate, corticosteroids, or protein kinase C inhibitors, etc) or inclusion in another trial (for any eye).
  • Verteporphin, external radiational therapy, subfoveal focal laser photocoagulation, vitrectomy, or transpupillary thermotherapy application to the eye before the study.

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treat and Extend
Patients received ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreally (ivt) once a month for 3 months. If the disease was inactive 4 weeks later, the next visit was postponed 2 weeks to 6 weeks later. If the disease was inactive during subsequent visits, the next visit was postponed an additional 2 weeks to 8 weeks later, the maximum interval between visits. If the disease became active at any visit, the patient received ranibizumab 0.5 mg ivt and the follow-up schedule started over.
Ranibizumab was supplied as a sterile solution in sealed glass vials.
Other Names:
  • Lucentis
Active Comparator: Treat and Observe
Patients received ranibizumab 0.5 mg intravitreally (ivt) once a month for 3 months. All subsequent visits occurred monthly. If the disease was active, the patient received ranibizumab 0.5 mg ivt. If the disease was inactive, no treatment was administered and the patient was instructed to return 1 month later.
Ranibizumab was supplied as a sterile solution in sealed glass vials.
Other Names:
  • Lucentis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (logMAR) From Baseline to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12
Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was assessed in the study eye. BCVA measurements were made using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity testing charts. Each letter on the chart has a score value of 0.02 log units. Since there are 5 letters per line, the total score for a line on the logMAR chart represents a change of 0.1 log units. The formula for calculating the logMAR BCVA score is: 0.1 + logMAR value of the best line read - 0.02 x number of letters read. A lower BCVA score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline to Month 12
Change in Letter Count From Baseline to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12
Letter count was assessed in the study eye. Measurements were made using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity testing charts. A higher letter count score indicates better vision. A negative change score indicates improvement.
Baseline to Month 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Letter Count From Baseline to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12
Letter count was assessed in the study eye. Measurements were made using the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity testing charts. Results are reported in various categories of change in letter count.
Baseline to Month 12
Number of Visits
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12
Baseline to Month 12
Follow-up Duration
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12
Follow-up duration was defined as the number of days from Baseline to study discontinuation.
Baseline to Month 12
Change in Central Retinal Thickness From Baseline to Month 12
Time Frame: Baseline to Month 12
Retinal thickness was measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT).
Baseline to Month 12
Quality of Life
Time Frame: Visits 2, 6, 9, 12, and 15 (up to 12 months)
The National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ-25) was used to measure a patient's subjective assessment of vision-related quality of life at Visits 2, 6, 9, 12, and 15. The 12 subscales in the VFQ-25 are general health, general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social function, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, and peripheral vision. The scores on the subscales were added together for a total score, which ranged from 0 to 100. A higher score indicated poorer function.
Visits 2, 6, 9, 12, and 15 (up to 12 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

June 22, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe