OBese Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome(OSAS) and EXercise Training (OBEX1)

October 1, 2018 updated by: AGIR à Dom

Comparison of 3 Exercise Training Modalities in Obese Patient With Sleep Apnea Syndrome Treated by Continue Positive Airway Pressure : a Randomized Controlled Study

The study was designed to test the following hypotheses:

In obese patients with OSAS, the benefit of the combination of exercise training + continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) will be higher than CPAP alone in term of functional capacity, metabolic, inflammatory, cardiovascular and sleep parameters and quality of life.

In obese patients with OSAS, the benefit of training using ventilatory assistance (NIV) during cycloergometer [cycloergometer with NIV] or respiratory muscles training (spirotiger) in addition to cycloergometer [cycloergometer + spirotiger] will be higher than cycloergometer training alone [cycloergometer] in term of functional and exercise capacities.

Dyspnea during walking test and respiratory muscle strength at baseline could influence the response to combined exercise training such as [cycloergometer + NIV] or [cycloergometer + spirotiger]

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Background: Obesity and sleep apnea syndrome lead to metabolic troubles and increasing cardiovascular risk. Furthermore, both diseases are associated with reduced exercise tolerance. We hypothesized that exercise training could be complementary to nocturnal ventilatory treatment in restoring metabolic disturbances, exercise tolerance and sleep parameters in obese patients with SAS.

Objective: To evaluate the effect of training on exercise tolerance (walking distance and dyspnea during walk)(main objective), systemic inflammation, vascular endothelial function, insulin resistance, quality of sleep and quality of life in obese patients treated by CPAP for OSAS (secondary objectives)

Methods: We proposed to conduct a controlled, randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 3 different modalities of training in obese patients with SAS. After a 6-week control pre-inclusion period, patients are included in either [cycloergometer] vs. [cycloergometer with ventilatory assistance] vs. [cycloergometer + respiratory muscle exercises]. Before and after the control period, and both immediately and 9 month after training, patients perform walking test, maximal incremental test on cycloergometer, blood sampling and cardiovascular function, body composition, muscle function, quality of sleep and quality of life assessments as well as spontaneous physical activity measurement. During the 5 years following inclusion in the training program, the number of cardiovascular event is recorded every year.

An interim analysis will be carried out when 30 will have completed the third evaluation session (after the training program). The Peto's method will be used to correct the p-values.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Quebec, Canada, GIV 4G5
        • Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec (IUCPQ)
      • Grenoble, France, 38043
        • Hopital Universitaire de Grenoble

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • OSAS (AHI > 30 before CPAP treatment)
  • > 4h/d CPAP treatment adherence
  • Obese patients with 35 < BMI < 45 kg/m2
  • Patients who give written consent
  • Patients who subscribed social insurance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiovascular or respiratory failure discovered at the moment of the inclusion in the study
  • Contraindication to exercise
  • Pregnant or breast-feed woman
  • Patients under guardianship
  • Imprisoned patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: ERGO
General endurance training on cycloergometer

12 weeks : 3 sessions per week (2 supervised sessions and 1 session at home)

1 technical visit and 1 nursing visit every two months at home for the CPAP

Active Comparator: ERGONIV/ ERGOSPIRO
General endurance training on cycloergometer using ventilatory assistance (ERGONIV) or additional respiratory muscle training (ERGOSPIRO)

12 weeks : 3 sessions per week (2 supervised sessions and 1 session at home)

1 technical visit and 1 nursing visit every two months at home for the CPAP

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in exercise tolerance during walking test
Time Frame: After control period (6th wk) vs. after training period (18th wk)
  • walking distance
  • dyspnea score
After control period (6th wk) vs. after training period (18th wk)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Changes in Aerobic capacity
Time Frame: After control period (6th wk) vs. after training period (18th and 52th wks)
Maximal oxygen consumption
After control period (6th wk) vs. after training period (18th and 52th wks)
Changes in cardiovascular and metabolic function
Time Frame: After control period (6th wk) vs. after training period (18th and 52th wks)
Pulse wave velocity, peripheral arterial tone, BP, inflammatory and metabolic plasmatic markers
After control period (6th wk) vs. after training period (18th and 52th wks)
Changes in sleep parameters and Quality Of life
Time Frame: After control period (6th wk) vs. after training period (18th and 52th wks)
Nocturnal oxygen saturation, CPAP data, Epworth questionnaire, Short Form (36) Health Survey questionnaire
After control period (6th wk) vs. after training period (18th and 52th wks)
Number of cardiovascular events per year
Time Frame: Every year from the 1st to the 5th year
Questionnaire sent to the patient by mail
Every year from the 1st to the 5th year
Changes in body composition
Time Frame: After control period (6th wk) vs. after training period (18th and 52th wks)
Fat mass and fat-mass index Fat-free mass and fat-free mass index assessed by impedancemetry measurements
After control period (6th wk) vs. after training period (18th and 52th wks)
Change in physical activity and sleep duration
Time Frame: After control period (6th wk) vs. after training period (18th and 52th wks)
Number of hour per day of physical activity at 1, 2, 3 or 4 Metabolic Equivalents (METS); Number of steps per day; Sleep to lying position duration ratio
After control period (6th wk) vs. after training period (18th and 52th wks)
Change in exercise tolerance during walking test
Time Frame: After control period (6th wk) vs. after trainng (52th wk)
  • isotime dyspnea
  • isotime oxygen saturation
After control period (6th wk) vs. after trainng (52th wk)
Change in physiological variables during the control period
Time Frame: Before (1st) vs. after control period (6th wk)
  • functional and exercise parameters
  • cardiovascular parameters
  • metabolic parameters
  • sleep and quality of life parameters (Short Form (36) Health Survey)
  • physical activity
Before (1st) vs. after control period (6th wk)
Baseline characteristics
Time Frame: Before control period (1st week) or after the control period (6th week)
  • functional and exercise parameters
  • cardiovascular parameters
  • metabolic parameters
  • sleep and quality of life parameters (Short Form (36) Health Survey)
  • physical activity
Before control period (1st week) or after the control period (6th week)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jean-Louis Pépin, MD, PhD, Laboratoire EFCR, CHU de Grenoble, 38043, Grenoble, France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2014

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 30, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 30, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 1, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 2, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 1, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation

Subscribe