Evaluation on the Effects of Two Rehabilitation Treatment and Tape for Functional and Motor Recovery of LBP Patients (LBPT001)

April 5, 2023 updated by: Marco Bravi, Campus Bio-Medico University

Evaluation the Effectiveness of Two Modes of Rehabilitation Treatment and Elastic Taping for the Functional and Motor Recovery of the Patient Suffering From Low Back Pain.

The objective of this study is to verify which is the most effective type of rehabilitation treatment (rehabilitation based on core strengthening vs pilates) in patients suffering from low back pain.

The secondary objective is to verify whether the use of Kinesio Tape (KT) associated with rehabilitation treatment can have greater effects in the motor and functional recovery of patients suffering from Low Back Pain than traditional rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients will undergo an initial assessment with the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Unit Physicians, during which the participants will sign the informed consent. After that a first evaluation will be carried out (T-1) during which the subjects will be asked to perform 10 consecutive sit-to-stand tests and 10 consecutive front bending tests. During the sit-to-stand and front bending tests, the kinematics of the spine will be recorded using two MIMU - XSENS DOT.

The following scales will also be administered:

  • Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire
  • Numerical Rating Scales (NRS) 11-point scale to assess the average intensity of pain during the last week
  • The Short Form Health Survey 36 (SF-36) questionnaire to assess quality of life
  • The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ) to assess pain somatization
  • The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scale to assess anxiety and depression
  • The Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PSC) to assess the catastrophization of pain
  • The Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) for multidimensional pain assessment
  • The Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) to assess pain avoidance beliefs

Patients will be randomized in 2 groups (Group A and Group B). For both groups there will be 12 treatment sessions, 3 times a week. (4 weeks)

At mid-treatment (after 2 weeks), at the end of treatment (T1), and in follow-ups following 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5) the same assessments of the first visit will be repeated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • Signing of informed consent
  • Chronic low back pain defined as non-specific self-reported low back pain that persists daily for at least 3 months or at least half of the days in the last 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Specific cause of low back pain: disc herniation, spinal stenosis, cauda equina syndrome, infection, fracture, tumor.
  • Pregnant women
  • Neurological disorders and neurological signs (e.g. CNS disorders, weakness, paresthesia)
  • Respiratory disorders
  • Previous spinal surgery.
  • Pain in the lower limbs or lesions limiting their function
  • Taking pain medication

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A1
Rehabilitation based on core strengthening exercises associated with the application of REAL elastic taping
Physical rehabilitation based on core strengthening
Application of elastic taping
Sham Comparator: Group A2
Rehabilitation based on core strengthening exercises, associated with the application of SHAM elastic taping - sham comparator to group A1
Physical rehabilitation based on core strengthening
Application of elastic taping
Experimental: Group A3
rehabilitation based on exercises for core strengthening
Physical rehabilitation based on core strengthening
Active Comparator: Group B
The intervention group B will perform rehabilitation treatment with a structured protocol based on rehabilitation pilates. Comparator to Group A3
Physical rehabilitation based on rehabilitation pilates

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes in the low back pain related disability
Time Frame: At mid-treatment (2 weeks), at the end of treatment (4 weeks -T1), and in follow-ups following 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5)
changes from baseline of the low back pain disability will be assessed through the use of the Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire
At mid-treatment (2 weeks), at the end of treatment (4 weeks -T1), and in follow-ups following 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5)
changes in the low back pain intensity and perception
Time Frame: At mid-treatment (2 weeks), at the end of treatment (4 weeks -T1), and in follow-ups following 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5)
changes from baseline of the intensity of low back pain will be assessed through the use of the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ), the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ)
At mid-treatment (2 weeks), at the end of treatment (4 weeks -T1), and in follow-ups following 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5)
changes in the low back pain related anxiety and depression
Time Frame: At mid-treatment (2 weeks), at the end of treatment (4 weeks -T1), and in follow-ups following 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5)
changes from baseline of the low back pain related anxiety and depression will be assessed through the use of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
At mid-treatment (2 weeks), at the end of treatment (4 weeks -T1), and in follow-ups following 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5)
changes in the spine kinematics
Time Frame: At mid-treatment (2 weeks), at the end of treatment (4 weeks -T1), and in follow-ups following 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5)
changes from baseline of the low back pain kinematic will be assessed through the use of two MIMU - XSENS DOT. Subjects will be asked to perform 10 consecutive sit-to-stand tests and 10 consecutive front bending tests. During the tests, the kinematics of the spine will be recorded.
At mid-treatment (2 weeks), at the end of treatment (4 weeks -T1), and in follow-ups following 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
changes in the low back pain related quality of life
Time Frame: At mid-treatment (2 weeks), at the end of treatment (4 weeks -T1), and in follow-ups following 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5)
changes from baseline of the low back pain related quality of life will be assessed through the use of the Short Form ealthSurvey 36 (SF-36)
At mid-treatment (2 weeks), at the end of treatment (4 weeks -T1), and in follow-ups following 1 month (T2), 3 months (T3), 6 months (T4) and 12 months (T5)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Silvia Sterzi, Professor, Foundation Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico of Rome

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 12, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 7, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 6, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 5, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on Rehabilitation - core strengthening

Subscribe