- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01164319
"UNMASKING Study" For Atrial Fibrillation Recurrences Typing in Early Postoperative Period
Typing of the Atrial Fibrillation Recurrences in Early Postoperative Period After Pulmonary Veins Isolation Through Continous Subcutaneous Monitoring.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630055
- State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- highly symptomatic patients refractory to at least two antiarrhythmic drugs
- patients with sustained PAF episodes and/or history of PersAF interrupted with cardioversion.
Exclusion Criteria:
- congestive heart failure
- ejection fraction <35%
- left atrial diameter >60 mm
- previous ablation procedure
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Group 1 (no early recurrence)
Patients without atrial fibrillation recurrences through the implantable cardiac monitors during the 3 months post-ablation period.
|
The left atrium (LA) and PVs were explored through a transeptal approach. Real-time 3D LA maps were reconstructed by using a nonfluoroscopic navigation system (CARTO, Biosense-Webster Inc.). The ipsilateral left and right PVs were encircled in one lesion line by circumferential PV isolation. Radiofrequency energy was delivered at 43°C, 35 W, 0.5 cm away from the PV ostia at the anterior wall, and was reduced to 43°C, 30 W, 1 cm away from the PV ostia at the posterior wall, with a saline irrigation speed of 17 mL/min. The endpoint of ablation was PV isolation; this was confirmed when Lasso mapping showed the disappearance of all PV potentials or the dissociation of PV potentials from LA activity. The ICM (Reveal XT, Medtronic Inc) was implanted the day of the ablation procedure or 1 week before.The Reveal XT was implanted in the parasternal area of the chest. The requirement for defining the exact final position was an R-wave amplitude ≥0.4 mV assessed through the Vector Check. |
|
Active Comparator: Group 2 (early AF recurrence)
Patients with AF recurrences documented by the ICM during the 3 months post-ablation period.
|
The left atrium (LA) and PVs were explored through a transeptal approach. Real-time 3D LA maps were reconstructed by using a nonfluoroscopic navigation system (CARTO, Biosense-Webster Inc.). The ipsilateral left and right PVs were encircled in one lesion line by circumferential PV isolation. Radiofrequency energy was delivered at 43°C, 35 W, 0.5 cm away from the PV ostia at the anterior wall, and was reduced to 43°C, 30 W, 1 cm away from the PV ostia at the posterior wall, with a saline irrigation speed of 17 mL/min. The endpoint of ablation was PV isolation; this was confirmed when Lasso mapping showed the disappearance of all PV potentials or the dissociation of PV potentials from LA activity. The ICM (Reveal XT, Medtronic Inc) was implanted the day of the ablation procedure or 1 week before.The Reveal XT was implanted in the parasternal area of the chest. The requirement for defining the exact final position was an R-wave amplitude ≥0.4 mV assessed through the Vector Check. |
|
Active Comparator: Group 3 (early recurrence-no reablation)
Patients with AF recurrences documented by the ICM during the 3 months post-ablation period from Group 2 would not receive reablation.
|
The left atrium (LA) and PVs were explored through a transeptal approach. Real-time 3D LA maps were reconstructed by using a nonfluoroscopic navigation system (CARTO, Biosense-Webster Inc.). The ipsilateral left and right PVs were encircled in one lesion line by circumferential PV isolation. Radiofrequency energy was delivered at 43°C, 35 W, 0.5 cm away from the PV ostia at the anterior wall, and was reduced to 43°C, 30 W, 1 cm away from the PV ostia at the posterior wall, with a saline irrigation speed of 17 mL/min. The endpoint of ablation was PV isolation; this was confirmed when Lasso mapping showed the disappearance of all PV potentials or the dissociation of PV potentials from LA activity. The ICM (Reveal XT, Medtronic Inc) was implanted the day of the ablation procedure or 1 week before.The Reveal XT was implanted in the parasternal area of the chest. The requirement for defining the exact final position was an R-wave amplitude ≥0.4 mV assessed through the Vector Check. |
|
Active Comparator: Group 4 (early recurrence-early reablation)
Patients with AF recurrences documented by the ICM during the 3 months post-ablation period from Group 2 will receive early reablation based on data stored by implanted monitor.
|
The left atrium (LA) and PVs were explored through a transeptal approach. Real-time 3D LA maps were reconstructed by using a nonfluoroscopic navigation system (CARTO, Biosense-Webster Inc.). The ipsilateral left and right PVs were encircled in one lesion line by circumferential PV isolation. Radiofrequency energy was delivered at 43°C, 35 W, 0.5 cm away from the PV ostia at the anterior wall, and was reduced to 43°C, 30 W, 1 cm away from the PV ostia at the posterior wall, with a saline irrigation speed of 17 mL/min. The endpoint of ablation was PV isolation; this was confirmed when Lasso mapping showed the disappearance of all PV potentials or the dissociation of PV potentials from LA activity. The ICM (Reveal XT, Medtronic Inc) was implanted the day of the ablation procedure or 1 week before.The Reveal XT was implanted in the parasternal area of the chest. The requirement for defining the exact final position was an R-wave amplitude ≥0.4 mV assessed through the Vector Check. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Freedom from atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter/tachycardia in Group 4 vs Group 3
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Freedom from AF in each group and the comparison of any group to each other
Time Frame: 12 months
|
12 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- AFERAWCLP-022
- RU AF 002 (Other Identifier: State Research Institute of Circulation Pathology)
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation
-
Medtronic Cardiac Ablation SolutionsRecruitingParoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation (PAF) | Persistent Atrial Fibrillation | Atrial Fibrillation (AF)Australia, United States, France, Belgium, Switzerland, Czechia
-
China National Center for Cardiovascular DiseasesRecruitingAtrial Fibrillation Ablation | Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation | Atrial Fibrillation Recurrent | Pulsed Field AblationChina
-
Ablacon, Inc.CompletedArrhythmias, Cardiac | Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent | Persistent Atrial Fibrillation | Longstanding Persistent Atrial FibrillationGermany
-
CortexAblacon, Inc.Active, not recruitingAtrial Fibrillation | Arrhythmias, Cardiac | Arrhythmia | Atrial Flutter | Atrial Fibrillation, Persistent | Atrial Tachycardia | Atrial Arrhythmia | Atrial Fibrillation Paroxysmal | Atrial Fibrillation, Paroxysmal or PersistentUnited States, Belgium, Netherlands, Czechia
-
AtriCure, Inc.Active, not recruitingPersistent Atrial Fibrillation | Atrial Fibrillation (AF) | Longstanding Persistent Atrial FibrillationUnited States
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingAtrial Fibrillation (AF) | Persistant Atrial FibrillationUnited States, Spain, Belgium, France, Netherlands, Germany, Hong Kong
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingParoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation | Persistent Atrial FibrillationHong Kong, Czechia, Croatia, Taiwan
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterRWTH Aachen UniversityUnknownAtrial Fibrillation (Paroxysmal) | Atrial Fibrillation Recurrent | Atrial Fibrillation Common Gene VariantsNetherlands
-
Vivek ReddyBoston Scientific CorporationRecruitingParoxysmal Atrial Fibrillation | Persistent Atrial FibrillationUnited States
-
Navy General Hospital, BeijingNot yet recruitingAtrial Fibrillation (AF) | Atrial Fibrillation Burden
Clinical Trials on Circumferential PVI and subcutaneous cardiac monitor implantation
-
University Hospital MuensterEuropean UnionCompleted
-
René Husted WorckBiosense Webster, Inc.Completed
-
University Hospital, CaenHospices Civils de Lyon; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint Etienne; Saint... and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingAtrial FibrillationFrance
-
University of LuebeckUnknownAtrial FibrillationGermany
-
Bezmialem Vakif UniversityCompleted
-
University of RochesterAbbottActive, not recruitingHeart Failure | Atrial FibrillationUnited States
-
Klinik für Kardiologie, Pneumologie und AngiologieRecruitingBradycardia | Syncope | Ventricular Fibrillation | Ventricular Tachycardia | Tachycardia | Sudden Cardiac DeathGermany
-
McMaster UniversityCompletedCritical Illness | Hemodynamically StableCanada
-
Massachusetts General HospitalCompletedChildren Receiving General AnesthesiaUnited States
-
Edwards LifesciencesCompletedCardiac Output, Low | Cardiac Output, HighSwitzerland, Finland