A Study to Evaluate the Performance of Two Designs of Soft Toric Lenses

October 5, 2020 updated by: Bausch & Lomb Incorporated
The objective of the study is to evaluate the product performance of the Bausch + Lomb toric investigational contact lenses compared to the currently marketed PureVision toric contact lenses.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

302

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Rochester, New York, United States, 14609
        • Bausch & Lomb

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects must have clear central corneas and be free of any anterior segment disorders.
  • Subjects must be adapted lens wearers, wear a lens in each eye and each lens must be of the same manufacture and brand.
  • Subjects must be myopic and require lens correction
  • Subjects must be habitual wearers of toric soft contact lenses.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with any systemic disease currently affecting ocular health or which in the Investigator's opinion may have an effect on ocular health during the course of the study.
  • Subjects using any systemic or topical medications that will, in the Investigator's opinion, affect ocular physiology or lens performance.
  • Subjects with an active ocular disease or who are using any ocular medication.
  • Subjects with any grade 2 or greater finding during the slit lamp examination. Subjects with corneal infiltrates, of ANY GRADE, are not eligible.
  • Subjects with any "Present" finding during the slit lamp examination that, in the Investigator's judgment, interferes with contact lens wear.
  • Subjects who are allergic to any component in the study care products.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Investigational Toric Lens
Bausch + Lomb investigational toric contact lenses
Bausch & Lomb investigational toric contact lens worn on a daily wear basis for 2 weeks.
Active Comparator: PureVision Toric Lens
Currently marketed Bausch + Lomb PureVision toric contact lenses
Currently marked Bausch & Lomb PureVision Toric Lens worn on a daily wear basis for 2 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Eyes With Absolute Lens Rotation ≤ 10 Degrees.
Time Frame: 2 weeks
2 weeks
Visual Acuity
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Visual acuity was assessed by distance high contrast logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Eyes With > Grade 2 Slit Lamp Findings
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Graded slit lamp findings for each eye, including epithelial edema, epithelial microcysts, corneal staining, limbal and bulbar injections, upper lid tarsal conjunctival abnormalities, corneal neovascularization, and corneal infiltrates were graded for severity on a scale from 0 (No Finding) to 4 (Severe Finding). The outcome measure is any finding > grade 2, across abnormalities.
2 weeks
Symptoms and Complaints
Time Frame: 2 weeks
Symptoms/complaints were assessed on a scale from 0 to 100, with 0 denoting unfavorable symptoms/complaints. Symptoms/complaints were recorded at each post-dispensing visit based on the subject's experience with the study lens worn prior to the visit. The symptoms/complaints parameters were: Burning/stinging upon insertion; Comfort upon insertion, Overall comfort, and Comfort at the end of the day; Ease of handling/insertion, and Ease of handling/removal; Dryness; Itchiness; Redness; Vision; Lens cleanliness; and Overall impression.
2 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Beverly Barna, Bausch & Lomb Incorporated

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2011

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 4, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 4, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

March 7, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 8, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 5, 2020

Last Verified

October 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 680

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myopia

Clinical Trials on Investigational Toric Lens

Subscribe