Effect of a Vitamin D Analogue vs Placebo on p-NT-proBNP in Patients With Type 1 DM and Diabetic Nephropathy

April 12, 2012 updated by: Peter Rossing

The Effect of Paricalcitol Versus Placebo on Plasma N-Terminal-proBNP in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus and Diabetic Nephropathy

The primary objective is to assess the impact of three months of treatment with an active vitamin D analogue on a risk marker for excess overall mortality and cardiovascular morbidity/mortality in Type 1 diabetic patients with diabetic kidney disease. The hypothesis is that active vitamin D analogue treatment reduces the risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with type 1 diabetic kidney disease.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

48

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Gentofte, Denmark, 2400
        • Steno Diabetes Center A/S

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18-75 years of age
  • Type 1 diabetes mellitus
  • Diabetic nephropathy (defined by persistent albuminuria, > 300 mg/24 hr or 200µg/min in 2 of 3 consecutive samples, presence of diabetic retinopathy and absence of clinical or laboratory evidence of other kidney or renal tract disease
  • Chronic kidney disease stage 3 and 4
  • S-Parathyroid hormone (s-PTH)> 35pg/ml
  • Stabile RAAS-blocking and diuretic treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other kidney disease than diabetic nephropathy
  • Myocardial infarction within the last three months prior to visit 1
  • Coronary artery revascularization within the last three months prior to visit 1
  • Transitional cerebral ischemia (TCI) or apoplexia within the last three months prior to visit 1
  • Cardiac Failure (NYHA Class III or IV)
  • Kidney Failure (GFR <15ml/min), dialysis, kidney transplantation)
  • Liver disease with serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT>3 x the normal value
  • Alcohol/drug abuse
  • Hypercalcemia (serum ionized calcium >1.35 mmol /L)
  • Medication with phosphate and/or vitamin D-containing medications, which can not be paused during the study
  • Clinical signs of vitamin D toxicity
  • Pregnant or nursing women
  • Fertile women not using chemical or mechanical (IUD) contraceptive methods
  • Current disulfiram treatment
  • Allergy to the study drug
  • Patient unable to understand the informed consent
  • Any other condition or therapy which, in the opinion of the investigator, makes the patient not suited for participation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Paricalcitol
Crossover study between paricalcitol and placebo
capsule, 1-2 micrograms daily for 90 days
Other Names:
  • Zemplar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in plasma NT-proBNP
Time Frame: 7 months
7 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change in Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR)
Time Frame: 7 months
7 months
Change in Urinary Albumin Excretion Rate
Time Frame: 7 months
7 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lise Tarnow, MD, Steno Diabetes Center A/S

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 7, 2011

First Posted (Estimate)

April 8, 2011

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

April 13, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 12, 2012

Last Verified

April 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Disease

Clinical Trials on Paricalcitol

3
Subscribe