Hip Fracture Surgery and Oral Nutritional Supplements (HIATUS)

November 22, 2013 updated by: Société des Produits Nestlé (SPN)

Effect of a Nutritional Intervention on Hip Fracture Surgery Recovery

Senior hip fracture patients are the most vulnerable to malnutrition and protein deficiency. Low protein intake, like vitamin D deficiency, contribute to an increased risk for hip fracture. Notably, several clinical trials with protein supplementation in senior hip fracture patients resulted in fewer deaths, shorter hospital stay, and a higher likelihood of return to independent living. The proposal is to test the effect of an oral nutritional supplement (ONS) which has been designed to meet the specific nutrient needs of senior bone and muscle health. The hypothesis is that this ONS will improve functional recovery after hip fracture (as measured by Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)), improve quality of life, improve muscle mass, and- decrease falls and hospital re-admission after hip fracture.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

24

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8091
        • University of Zurich,Dept. of Rheumatology and Institute of Physical Medicine,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

70 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age (70+);
  • Had an acute hip fracture and surgical treatment
  • Able to walk at least 3 meters without assistance of another person, with or without a walking aid other than a wheeled walker prior to hip fracture MMSE >=18 (proxy will be informed in addition if MMS-score ≤ 24)
  • Able to perform the SPPB at baseline
  • No prior hip fracture
  • Patient (and/or his/her legal representatives/relatives) understands the study procedure, alternative treatments available and risks involved with the study, and voluntarily agrees to participate by giving his/her (or his/her legal representative's/relatives) written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Baseline visit can not be performed between the second and tenth postoperative day.
  • Milk protein allergy
  • Patients with conservative treatment for hip fracture
  • Serum calcium adjusted for albumin of > 2.6 mmol/L
  • Pathologic fracture in the last year (except for fractures due to osteoporosis)
  • Chemo therapy / Radiation /antihormonal therapy due to cancer in the last year
  • Treatment which has an effect on calcium metabolism (e.g. PTH, calcitonin, chronic cortisone intake > 5mg/day in the last 12 months (except for inhalation and sporadic infiltration))
  • Oral vitamin D intake of more than 1000 IU per day during the last 3 months before the study
  • Unwilling to stop multi-vitamin, calcium supplementation, and vitamin D supplementation during the trial (maximal calcium supplement intake 250mg/d; no additional vitamin D supplementation). We will inform the treating physician that we initiated vitamin D supplementation as standard of care.
  • Severe visual or hearing impairment
  • Unwilling or unable to take study medication
  • Diseases with a risk of recurrent falling (e.g. Parkinson's disease/syndrome, Hemiplegia after stroke, symptomatic stenosis of the spinal canal, polyneuropathy, epilepsy, recurring vertigo, recurring syncope) BMI ≥ 40
  • Estimated creatinine clearance < 15 ml/min (estimated Creatinine Clearance cockcroft and Gault)
  • Malabsorption syndrome (celiac diseases, inflammatory bowel disease, hepatic and/or pancreas dysfunction)
  • Diseases that may enhance serum calcium: sarcoidosis, lymphoma, primary hyperparathyroidism
  • Kidney stone in the last 10 years
  • Patient heavily consumes alcohol containing products defined as greater than (>) 3 drinks (beer, wine, or distilled spirits) of alcoholic beverages per day.
  • Patients who are planning a stay in a "sunny" location (e.g. winter sun resort) for more than one month during the trial
  • Medication which has an effect on serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level (e.g. certain anticonvulsants (e.g. Phenobarbital, Carbamazepin, Phenytoin) M. Paget (Ostitis deformans)
  • Inflammatory arthritis (e.g. rheumatoid arthritis, reiter syndrome, psoriasis arthritis)
  • Uncontrolled metabolic conditions, or psychiatric conditions that might make tolerance or evaluation of the feeding formula difficult
  • Severe acute and/or chronic disease that makes the performance of the study assessments impossible (e.g. severe infection/sepsis, myocardial infarction, heart failure, respiratory failure or renal failure);
  • Patient is taking peripherally acting anti-adiposity drugs (e.g. Xenical®, formoline L112®, (Acomplia®))
  • Patients taking protein supplements (>15g per serving more than once a week) or are unwilling to stop any protein supplements during the trial Participation in a study in the last 6 month, except for studies without drug-application, or any influence of the study-medication can be excluded
  • Patient is unlikely to adhere to the study procedures, to keep appointments, or is planning to relocate during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
placebo product with no specific nutrients
Experimental: Specialized Oral Nutritional Supplement
Specialized nutritional supplement for seniors

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Quality of Life
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Nutritional status
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Muscle strength
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Heike Bischoff-Ferrari,, MD, DrPH, University of Zurich

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 22, 2011

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

January 9, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 25, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 22, 2013

Last Verified

November 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NES1026CLI

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hip Fracture

Clinical Trials on Oral nutritional Supplement

Subscribe