- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01644344
A Prospective Trial Comparing the Cost of Post Operative X-rays for Fractures Treated With Stable Internal Fixation (SPOR)
October 3, 2012 updated by: University of Manitoba
Pilot Study for a Randomized Control Trial Comparing the Cost of a Simplified Post-Operative Radiographic (SPOR) Protocol for Fractures With Stable Internal Fixation Treated at Health Sciences Centre
The standard post-operative radiographic protocol for the monitoring of fractures at HSC includes post-operative in hospital radiographs as well as radiographs at the two week follow up appointment.
This is in addition to good quality intra-operative radiographs.
With current operative techniques and implants, orthopaedic surgeons can achieve reliably stable internal fixation.
In fact, patients are often allowed to take weight through the fractured limb immediately post-operatively.
In these cases, redundant post-operative radiographs likely represent an avoidable cost to the system financially, and an avoidable cost to the patient in additional time spent in hospital and unnecessary radiation exposure.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
39
Phase
- Phase 3
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Manitoba
-
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3A 1R9
- Health Sciences Centre
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
17 years and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Femur fracture treated with intramedullary nailing
- Tibia fracture treated with intramedullary nailing
- Ankle fractures treated with standard compression technique
- Humeral shaft fractures treated with standard compression technique
- Forearm fractures treated with standard compression technique
- One or both bones fractured
- Simple fracture or presence of single butterfly fragment treated with lag screw
- Clavicle fracture treated with standard compression technique
- Olecranon fracture treated with standard compression technique
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 17 years, or open growth plates
- Multiple orthopaedic fractures
- History of radiographic appearance of osteoporosis or osteopenia or poor operative bone quality
- Likely difficult with follow-up in first 6 weeks
- Same day surgery case
- Surgeon feels patient should be excluded
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: X-ray
Control group: patients will receive standard radiographs post-operative day one or two in hospital, as well as radiographs in clinic at two and six weeks.
Each time radiographs are completed, the surgeon or resident will document if a change in fixation position is noted and if a change in patient management will be entertained (addition, modification or maintenance of cast or splint use, modification of or decision not to advance activity level, need for further surgery to adjust fixation or fracture reduction).
The patients' time spent in clinic will be recorded upon arrival and upon completion of the patient-physician interaction.
|
|
|
Active Comparator: No X-ray
|
Treatment group: these patients will not have routine post-operative in hospital radiographs, or radiographs in clinic at two weeks.
After examining the patient, the surgeon or resident can order radiographs if required at any time.
The decision will be made based on patient complaints of increased pain, appearance of abuse of the splint or cast suggesting lack of compliance or visible clinical deformity of the limb.
The reason leading to radiographs will be documented by the ordering physician.
If radiographs are ordered based on a wound complication, this will be specifically documented.
Radiographic findings will be documented on a form identical to that used for the control group.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
cost-effectiveness of a simplified post-operative radiographic protocol for selected fractures
Time Frame: post-operative day one or two in hospital, as well as in clinic at two and six weeks
|
Cost-effectiveness will be measured by calculating cost of x-ray, patient care and time spent by patient in clinic.
|
post-operative day one or two in hospital, as well as in clinic at two and six weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: At six weeks post-op
|
Validated Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire to be used to measure patient satisfaction with a simplified post-operative radiographic protocol.
|
At six weeks post-op
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
January 1, 2012
Primary Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2012
Study Completion (Actual)
August 1, 2012
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 12, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 18, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
July 19, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
October 4, 2012
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 3, 2012
Last Verified
March 1, 2012
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- RI1211:135
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.