Comparison of the Quantity of Distal Movement of the Upper Canine and Molar

July 30, 2012 updated by: LUIS ALEJANDRO SANCHEZ URIBE, Universidad de Antioquia

Comparison of the Quantity of Distal Movement of the Upper Canine and Molar Using Class II Elastics With and Without Sliding Jig in a Period of 3 Months

THE PURPOSE OF THE STUDY IS COMPARE THE QUANTITY OF DISTAL MOVEMENT OF THE UPPER CANINE AND MOLAR USING CLASS II ELASTICS WITH AND WITHOUT SLIDING JIG IN A PERIOD OF 3 MONTHS

Study Overview

Detailed Description

To achieve a Class I canine relationship at the end of the alignment and leveling phase, different intraoral devices have been used. These include intermaxillary class II elastics, which retract the upper and protract the lower arch, generating extrusive forces at the anchorage sites. Its upper distalizing action is exerted to the canine bracket and transmitted through the posterior teeth where the upper molar does not receive a direct force. The sliding jig is an auxiliary addition that exerts force to the molar by an elastic hanged in a jig between the lateral and the canine in class II; such mechanism decreases the vertical adverse effects of the elastics wearing while directing the distalizing force to the molar.

A randomized, unblinded, clinical trial comparing 30 units of analysis (hemi arches) in which were placed sliding jig or stand alone elastics were perform.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Antioquia
      • Medellin, Antioquia, Colombia, 00000
        • Faculty of Dentistry

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

9 years to 36 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Class II dental malocclusion with alignment and leveling phase ended.
  • Root completed not trauma
  • Second molar erupted
  • Third molar absent
  • Dental and periodontal health

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Root uncompleted
  • Dental Trauma
  • Dental Pathology

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Class II elastics alone
Use of class II elastics alone to correct class II dental malocclusions
Elastics Class II alone, used 24 hours per day for 3 months from the hook of the upper canine to the first lower molar hook
Other Names:
  • Elastics 3/16 heavy, 6oz. Impala (Ormco)
Experimental: Class II elastics with Sliding Jig
Class II elastics with Sliding Jig for correction of dental class II malocclusion
Class II elastics, 3/16 6 oz, used daily for 3 months 24 hours per day and sliding jig orthodontic device
Other Names:
  • Archwire SS 16X22
  • Sliding Jig made in SS 17X25
  • Elastics 3/16 Heavy (6oz) Impala (Ormco)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CT analysis for comparison of distal movement of upper canine and molar using class II elastics
Time Frame: 3 months
CT were taken to compare the quantity of distal movement of the upper canine and molar using class II elastics alone.
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
CT analysis for comparison of distal movement of upper canine and molar using class II with Sliding Jig
Time Frame: 3 months
CT were taken to compare the quantity of distal movement of the upper canine and molar using class II elastics with sliding jig
3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Luis A Sanchez, Professor, Universidad de Antioquia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 12, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

July 31, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 31, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2012

Last Verified

July 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malocclusion

Clinical Trials on Class II elastic alone

Subscribe