Sepsis in Neutropenic Patients: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as Model: a Transcriptomic Approach

August 29, 2014 updated by: Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

Sepsis in Neutropenic Patients: Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation as Model: a Transcriptomic Approach.

Treatment of cancer, and more particularly of haematological malignancies, partly relies on chemotherapy. Most therapeutic regimens display various toxicities, one of the most common being haematological toxicity, affecting the three lineages. While anaemia and thrombopenia can be overcome by haematological growth factors and transfusion, one of the most severe life-threatening toxicity is sepsis that develops during neutropenia. Neutropenia, despite the use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSF) and antibiotics, is still a major limitation in chemotherapy which is responsible for the majority of treatment-related morbidity and mortality and for prolonged hospitalisation.

In neutropenic patients, sepsis is more frequent and more severe than in non-neutropenic patients. While the occurence of neutropenia and sepsis is often unpredictable and thus difficult to study in a prospective way, stem cell transplantation represents a quite convenient model to study such a question. Autologous stem cell transplantation indications in haematology are mainly multiple myeloma and relapsed lymphoma or Hodgkin disease. Briefly, after a mobilization procedure, a graft of patient's hematopoietic stem cells is collected by cytapheresis and frozen. When the patient has reached complete remission by conventional chemotherapy, he benefits from a very high dose myeloablative chemotherapy (called "conditioning regimen"). The "conditioning regimen" targeted to have high antitumoral activity leads to a "cytokine storm" resulting in a "programmed inflammation". 36 hours after the lasting of the conditioning regimen, the CD34+ cells are thawed and infused to the patient. Thus neutropenia usually begins at D4 post transplantation and lasts for 10 days, until graft becomes "functional". Thus, the timing and duration of neutropenia are very homogeneous. During neutropenia, fever and sepsis are very frequent (>80% patients), thus, most patient will be informative regarding sepsis, and there is an easy possibility of biological sampling before" programmed inflammation" (due to conditioning regimen), after inflammation before sepsis, then during and after the sepsis. Since the patient is hospitalized, the kinetic monitoring is quite easy

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

24

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Marseille, France, 13354
        • Recruiting
        • Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • laure farnault

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • the criteria required to be candidate in an ASCH in our service(department) (age 18 - 66 years, myélome in 1 ° in reply partial line or lymphoma or complete answer after one 2 ° line, absence of preliminary visceral failure).

Informed, willing patients and having given their agreement in writing.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of the patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: blood samples

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
blood samples
Time Frame: 3 YEARS
transcriptomic profile identification
3 YEARS

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
blood samples
Time Frame: 3 YEARS
the observed profile in patients developing fever and sepsis in comparison with patients not developing such complications
3 YEARS
blood samples
Time Frame: 3 YEARS
the prediction, for each patient, a transcriptomic signature linked to a higher risk developing a sepsis.
3 YEARS

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

May 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2015

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 21, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 24, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

September 26, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 1, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2014

Last Verified

August 1, 2014

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2012-A00322-41
  • 2012-08 (AP HM)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis in Neutropenic Patients

Clinical Trials on blood draw

Subscribe